3 MEGA USEFUL ChatGPT TOOLS you'll *actually use* for research!
Based on Andy Stapleton's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Use a prompt splitter to divide long documents into sequential parts that fit within ChatGPT’s input limits.
Briefing
Researchers who want to use ChatGPT’s stronger GPT-4-style capabilities often run into practical barriers: character limits, message caps, and the time sink of repeatedly crafting prompts. A set of purpose-built tools aims to remove those friction points by splitting large documents into manageable chunks, generating research-ready prompt templates, and turning frequently used instructions into one-line slash commands.
The first two tools tackle the same bottleneck—ChatGPT’s input limits—by breaking long text into parts that can be fed into the system sequentially. “Chat GPT prompt splitter” takes a thesis or other large document, then splits it into a specified number of parts (the example uses 15). Each part is copied into ChatGPT as “chunk” segments, with the workflow repeating until the full text is entered. A second tool, “Chat GPT splitter,” performs a similar job but uses a chunk-size approach (the example sets a 15,000 chunk size) and automatically divides the entire uploaded document into many chunks (29 in the demonstration). The payoff is straightforward: researchers can work with documents far larger than typical ChatGPT limits. The main tradeoff is operational—pasting lots of chunks can push users into ChatGPT’s “25 messages per three hours” ceiling.
Once the text-management problem is handled, the next bottleneck becomes prompt quality and speed. Instead of relying on prompt engineering from scratch, the transcript points to FlowGPT as a library of ready-to-use research prompts, including options like research paper summary and research field explained. Users can copy a prompt that matches their task, then adapt it as a scaffold for their own needs. For those willing to pay, prompt marketplaces are presented as an additional route, with research-focused listings such as research proposal and scientific research writing. The guidance is pragmatic: if budgets allow, try a few science-oriented prompts; if not, FlowGPT is positioned as the most populated free option for research.
Finally, “prompster” is introduced as a browser extension that streamlines repeated prompting by adding slash commands inside ChatGPT. After installing and configuring it, users type “/” and select a command like “act as an academic” or “article sum,” which preloads a complete instruction set (sourced from FlowGPT templates in the example). The extension also supports workflow tweaks such as adding “read this and say red when done,” making it easier to run the same research tasks repeatedly without copy-pasting.
Taken together, the tools form a workflow: split oversized documents into chunks, use proven prompt templates to generate research outputs, and automate recurring instructions with slash commands. The result is less manual typing, fewer limit-related interruptions, and a faster path from raw material to summaries, proposals, and structured research writing.
Cornell Notes
ChatGPT research workflows often stall due to input character limits, message caps, and the time required to craft strong prompts repeatedly. Two “splitter” tools solve the first issue by dividing long documents into sequential chunks that can be pasted into ChatGPT, enabling work with theses and other large texts (with the caveat that heavy chunking can hit the 25-messages-per-three-hours limit). FlowGPT provides research-focused prompt templates—such as research paper summaries and research field explanations—that users can copy and adapt as scaffolds. For repeat use, the prompster browser extension adds slash commands to ChatGPT, letting users trigger prebuilt prompts like “act as an academic” or “article sum” with minimal typing. Together, they reduce grunt work and keep research moving.
How do the two “splitter” tools help when ChatGPT rejects large inputs?
What’s the difference in workflow between “prompt splitter” and “splitter” (chunk count vs chunk size)?
Why use FlowGPT prompt templates instead of writing prompts from scratch?
What kinds of paid prompt marketplace options are mentioned for research?
How does prompster reduce repetitive work inside ChatGPT?
Review Questions
- When working with a thesis that exceeds ChatGPT’s input limits, what are the two chunking approaches described, and what limitation might still be hit?
- How can FlowGPT templates be used as scaffolds rather than fixed prompts?
- What does prompster change about the way prompts are triggered in ChatGPT, and why does that matter for repeated research tasks?
Key Points
- 1
Use a prompt splitter to divide long documents into sequential parts that fit within ChatGPT’s input limits.
- 2
Choose between splitting by a fixed number of parts (e.g., 15) or by chunk size (e.g., 15,000) depending on how you manage document length.
- 3
Expect that pasting many chunks can trigger ChatGPT’s 25 messages per three hours limit.
- 4
Start with FlowGPT research prompt templates (like research paper summary) and adapt them to the specific field and output format.
- 5
Consider paid prompt marketplaces for additional research-focused prompts, especially if you need specialized writing tasks.
- 6
Install prompster to convert frequently used prompts into slash commands, cutting down on repeated typing and copy-pasting.