Abstract Linear Algebra 7 | Change of Basis [dark version]
Based on The Bright Side of Mathematics's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Change of basis converts coordinate vectors when switching from one basis B to another basis C in the same finite-dimensional vector space V.
Briefing
Change of basis is the mechanism for translating the same abstract vector’s coordinates when the underlying basis in a finite-dimensional vector space changes. The practical payoff is immediate: different problems often call for different bases—ones that create lots of zeros in computations or ones that respect a problem’s symmetry—so the key question becomes how to convert coordinates from an “old” basis B to a “new” basis C without redoing everything in the abstract space.
The setup starts with a finite-dimensional vector space V of dimension n. Choosing a basis B = {B1, …, Bn} lets one use the basis isomorphism to identify V with the concrete space F^n (where F is R or C). Under this identification, each basis vector Bj corresponds to a canonical unit vector Ej in F^n. A second basis C = {C1, …, Cn} produces a different basis isomorphism, again mapping V to F^n, but now Cj corresponds to Ej instead. Since both bases represent the same abstract vectors in V, the same vector v has two coordinate descriptions: one as a column vector of coefficients (β1, …, βn) relative to B, and another as (γ1, …, γn) relative to C.
A concrete example uses the polynomial space P2(R), the set of real polynomials of degree at most 2. The standard “monomial” basis is m0(x)=1, m1(x)=x, and m2(x)=x^2. For the polynomial p(x)=3x^2+8x−2, the coordinates relative to {m0,m1,m2} are found by matching coefficients: p = (−2)m0 + 8m1 + 3m2, giving the coordinate vector (−2, 8, 3). Applying the inverse basis isomorphism recovers the abstract polynomial from that coordinate vector.
Next, a different basis C is introduced with three elements: C1=m0, C2=m1, and C3(x)=3x^2+8x. Even though C3 is itself a polynomial combination of m0,m1,m2, it still forms a valid basis once linear independence and spanning are checked. With respect to this new basis, the same polynomial p can be represented more simply: since C3 equals 3x^2+8x, the polynomial p differs from C3 only by the constant term −2, so p = 1·C3 + (−2)·C1 (and the coefficient of C2 is 0). That yields a new coordinate vector (−2, 0, 1) relative to C. The same abstract object now corresponds to different coordinate columns, and the conversion between these columns is exactly what “change of bases” means.
In general terms, the change of basis is constructed as a linear map f: F^n → F^n that converts coordinates in the B-representation directly into coordinates in the C-representation. Conceptually, it is built by composing the inverse of the B-identification with the C-identification: take an old coordinate vector, map it back to V using the inverse of the B basis isomorphism, then map the result into F^n using the C basis isomorphism. Because this is a linear map on F^n, it can be represented by a matrix—an idea reserved for the next step.
Cornell Notes
For a finite-dimensional vector space V, choosing a basis turns abstract vectors into coordinate vectors in F^n. If basis B and basis C are both used to represent the same vector v, then v has two different coordinate columns: β relative to B and γ relative to C. Change of basis is the linear map f: F^n → F^n that converts β into γ directly, without repeatedly working in the abstract space V. It is defined by composing the inverse of the B basis isomorphism with the C basis isomorphism. Since f is linear on F^n, it can be expressed as a matrix, which enables systematic coordinate conversion.
Why does changing the basis matter even when the underlying vector space V stays the same?
How does the polynomial example show two different coordinate vectors for the same polynomial?
What is the conceptual definition of the change-of-basis map f: F^n → F^n?
Why is it valid to treat change of basis as a linear map on F^n?
How does the “direct conversion” idea avoid unnecessary abstract computations?
Review Questions
- Given two bases B and C of an n-dimensional vector space V, what does it mean that the coordinate vectors relative to B and C are unique once the bases are fixed?
- For p(x)=3x^2+8x−2 in P2(R), compute its coordinate vectors relative to the monomial basis {1, x, x^2} and relative to the basis {m0, m1, 3x^2+8x}.
- Describe the change-of-basis map f in terms of composing which two maps, and explain why f must be linear.
Key Points
- 1
Change of basis converts coordinate vectors when switching from one basis B to another basis C in the same finite-dimensional vector space V.
- 2
A basis isomorphism identifies V with F^n by mapping each basis vector Bj or Cj to the corresponding canonical unit vector Ej.
- 3
The same abstract vector v has different coordinate columns (β vs. γ) depending on the chosen basis, even though v itself is unchanged.
- 4
In P2(R), p(x)=3x^2+8x−2 has coordinates (−2, 8, 3) in the monomial basis {1, x, x^2}.
- 5
Using the basis {m0, m1, 3x^2+8x}, the same polynomial becomes (−2, 0, 1), illustrating how coordinates can simplify.
- 6
The change-of-basis map f: F^n → F^n is defined as the composition of the inverse B-identification followed by the C-identification.
- 7
Because f is linear and bijective on F^n, it can be represented by a matrix for systematic coordinate conversion.