Aggressive Self Editing: How To Become Happy with Every Word You Write with Jerry Jenkins
Based on ProWritingAid's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Self-editing in this workshop focuses on line-level copy editing—word choice and sentence construction—rather than big-picture structural revision.
Briefing
Aggressive self-editing is framed as the fastest route to writing that agents and acquisitions editors can trust—because it tightens style and clarity without waiting for someone else to fix avoidable problems. Jerry Jenkins draws a sharp line between “substantive” revision (structure, flow, pacing, character) and the more mechanical but high-impact work of line-level copy editing: word choice and sentence construction. The goal is simple but demanding—be “happy with every word” before submission—since poorly edited manuscripts can get judged quickly and moved on from, often within a couple of pages.
Jenkins argues that editing isn’t just publishers’ territory; it’s writers’ responsibility to polish “publishable stuff.” He also pushes a style-first mindset: his self-editing checklist targets clarity and voice rather than treating grammar as the whole game. That emphasis shows up repeatedly in the workshop’s examples—passive voice that weakens sentences, redundancies that add bulk without meaning, clichés that signal low originality, and dialogue tags or adverbs that can intrude on the reader’s experience. Francine Prose’s idea is used as a north star: the satisfaction of cutting and reshaping sentences until they snap into a clearer, more economical form.
Chris Banks, creator of ProWritingAid, demonstrates how the software supports this “ferocious self editing” workflow. The editor can run a summary report that scores grammar, spelling, and style, then breaks results down by paragraph and surfaces actionable issues. Beyond quick checks, the tool provides targeted reports—like passive voice detection, readability measures, redundancy and cliché highlighting, dialogue tag and attribution checks, and “telling vs. showing” flags. Banks stresses that the software doesn’t replace human editors, but it delivers “quick wins” so later editorial time can focus on higher-level craft.
A major segment focuses on passive voice. The workshop teaches a practical detection method: look for “state of being” verbs (am, is, are, was, were, be, being, been, has, have, had, do, does, etc.) and especially constructions that include “by” (e.g., “was planned by Jill”). A memory trick—if “by zombies” can be inserted after the verb, the sentence is passive—helps writers revise into more direct active forms.
Readability is treated as another lever for keeping readers immersed. ProWritingAid uses Flesch Reading Ease to estimate comprehension effort, with guidance that fiction often lands around a 60–70 target (roughly seventh-grade comprehension). The software also highlights “readability enhancements” such as nominalizations (e.g., “make a decision” → “decide”) and suggests removing overly complex words.
The workshop then stacks additional style fixes: subtle redundancies (“nodded her head in agreement”), overused adverbs and hedging (“smiled slightly,” “almost”), needless words (“located in the back part of the book”), and “glue words” that make sentences harder to follow. For fiction, extra reports flag repeats (words/phrases used too often), sentence-length variety problems, and provide exploratory tools like Word Explorer to spark fresh wording.
In Q&A, Jenkins and Banks reinforce practical boundaries: editing should not become endless—at some point, further changes only make sentences “different,” not better. They also address workflow and access questions: ProWritingAid works with Microsoft Word via plugins (Windows) and via a desktop app for Mac; it can open Scrivener projects without manual exporting; it’s currently English-focused (Spanish in development); and it’s positioned as secure, with encrypted transmission and storage only when users choose to save to the service.
Cornell Notes
The workshop argues that “ferocious self editing” at the line level—word choice and sentence construction—can materially improve a manuscript’s chances with agents and acquisitions editors. Jenkins emphasizes that editing isn’t only a publisher’s job: poorly edited work can be rejected quickly, and writers should polish for clarity, economy, and voice before submission. ProWritingAid is presented as a tool that finds style problems (passive voice, redundancies, clichés, dialogue tag issues, telling vs. showing, adverb overuse, needless words, glue words) and reports them with actionable guidance. Banks frames the software as a way to get “quick wins” so human editors can spend time on deeper craft. The session also warns against endless revision: once changes stop improving quality, it’s time to stop.
How does the workshop distinguish “substantive” revision from the kind of self-editing that matters most here?
What practical method is taught for spotting passive voice?
Why does the session treat readability scores as more than a vanity metric?
What kinds of “style clutter” does ProWritingAid help detect, and what’s the rationale behind each?
How do Jenkins and Banks address the fear that aggressive cutting will ruin a novel?
Where does the session draw the line between revision and endless tinkering?
Review Questions
- Which specific sentence-level issues (passive voice, redundancies, clichés, glue words, etc.) are most likely to hurt an agent’s early impression, and why?
- Apply the “by zombies” test to a sample passive sentence you’ve written. What active rewrite would you produce?
- How would you decide whether a readability score is “too high” or “too low” for your target audience and genre?
Key Points
- 1
Self-editing in this workshop focuses on line-level copy editing—word choice and sentence construction—rather than big-picture structural revision.
- 2
Agents and acquisitions editors can reject poorly edited manuscripts quickly, so writers should polish for clarity and economy before submission.
- 3
ProWritingAid is positioned as a style-first tool that finds issues like passive voice, redundancies, clichés, dialogue tag problems, telling vs. showing, adverb overuse, needless words, and glue words.
- 4
Passive voice detection is taught through “state of being” verbs and “by” constructions, with a memory trick (“by zombies”) to confirm passive structure.
- 5
Readability is treated as immersion support, using Flesch Reading Ease and paragraph-level breakdowns to target sections that are hardest to understand.
- 6
Cutting is framed as power-building: removing needless words and clutter can create room for stronger, leaner scenes rather than shrinking the story’s value.
- 7
Revision should stop when changes no longer improve quality—endless yo-yo editing can make writing different without making it better.