Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Analyzing OpenAlex Data with VOSviewer || OpenAlex MetaData with VOSviewer || Bibliometric Analysis thumbnail

Analyzing OpenAlex Data with VOSviewer || OpenAlex MetaData with VOSviewer || Bibliometric Analysis

eSupport for Research·
4 min read

Based on eSupport for Research's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

VOSviewer can generate bibliometric maps using OpenAlex metadata retrieved via an API, avoiding manual dataset handling.

Briefing

OpenAlex can serve as a free, open research metadata source for bibliometric work—especially when paired with VOSviewer to map how scientific papers connect through authors, citations, and bibliographic coupling. The workflow described centers on pulling OpenAlex records via an API, converting the retrieved metadata into a format VOSviewer can analyze, and then generating network visualizations such as author collaboration maps and bibliographic coupling overlays. The practical payoff is clear: researchers can run literature reviews, keyword- or field-based analyses, and comparative checks against other databases without paying for access to proprietary datasets.

The process begins in VOSviewer by choosing a “create” option for a map based on bibliographic data. Instead of manually downloading datasets, the workflow uses “download data through API,” selecting OpenAlex as the API source. Users can tailor the query with fields such as title, abstract, and full text (the transcript keeps full text enabled), apply a search term (example shown: “ECG signal”), and refine results by handling typos and narrowing classification. After the API call, the system retrieves a set of documents (the example run returns 770 documents) along with metadata including author information, venue details (source, volume, issue, page), and references.

Once the dataset is loaded, the analysis step focuses on building networks. For an author network, the workflow sets parameters like the minimum number of documents per author (the transcript shows a threshold in the hundreds) and then runs the “co-authorship” analysis to produce a map where nodes represent authors and links represent relationships. For bibliographic coupling, the workflow switches to a coupling mode (the transcript mentions bibliographic coupling and also references “cited”/“site” style coupling options), using the loaded documents to compute which papers share reference lists. The resulting visualization includes connection density and an overlay view, letting users interpret clusters—such as how research themes cluster around machine learning, data mining, and computer science when the query targets a specific domain.

The transcript also emphasizes usability features that make the outputs easier to reuse: VOSviewer supports exporting or saving visualizations, taking screenshots, and sharing results. The author network and coupling maps can be used to guide literature review structure—identifying key contributors, research communities, and how topics interlink.

A key motivation is validation and comparison. For teams already using Scopus or Web of Science, OpenAlex offers a free alternative to cross-check findings, counterbalance database coverage differences, and run comparative bibliometric analyses. The transcript frames OpenAlex as especially helpful when Web of Science or Scopus access requires subscriptions, while OpenAlex and related components (like Dimension) are presented as free options. Overall, the described pipeline turns OpenAlex metadata into actionable bibliometric maps through VOSviewer, enabling faster, lower-cost literature review analytics and database comparison.

Cornell Notes

The workflow pairs OpenAlex with VOSviewer to perform bibliometric analysis using metadata pulled through an API. Users create a VOSviewer map from bibliographic data, select “download data through API,” choose OpenAlex, and craft a search query (including options like title/abstract/full text). After retrieval (example: 770 documents for “ECG signal”), VOSviewer converts the metadata and generates network visualizations. The transcript demonstrates author co-authorship mapping and bibliographic coupling to reveal how researchers and papers cluster around topics. This matters because OpenAlex is free, enabling literature review mapping and comparative validation against paid databases like Web of Science or Scopus.

How does the workflow get data from OpenAlex into VOSviewer without manual downloads?

In VOSviewer, the user chooses a “create” option for a map based on bibliographic data, then selects “download data through API.” OpenAlex is kept as the API source, and the query is configured with fields such as title, abstract, and full text. The system runs the API retrieval, converts the returned metadata, and loads the resulting document set into VOSviewer for analysis.

What kinds of bibliometric networks can be generated after the OpenAlex records load?

The transcript shows two main network types. First, an author co-authorship network (“author network”): authors become nodes and co-authorship relationships become links, with a configurable minimum document threshold per author. Second, bibliographic coupling: papers are linked based on shared references, producing clusters that help interpret topic overlap and research communities.

What query controls help narrow results in the OpenAlex API step?

The workflow includes controls for the search query and text fields (title/abstract/full text). It also mentions narrowing classification and checking for typos to avoid misspellings. These settings determine which documents are retrieved before VOSviewer runs the bibliometric computations.

Why is bibliographic coupling useful for literature review work?

Bibliographic coupling highlights papers that cite similar reference lists, which often indicates related subject matter even when authors or keywords differ. The transcript frames this as useful for identifying how documents connect—supporting comparative analysis and helping structure a literature review around clusters.

How does OpenAlex help when comparing results from paid databases?

The transcript positions OpenAlex as a free source for metadata and bibliometric mapping, which can be used to validate or counterbalance findings from databases that may require subscriptions (like Web of Science or Scopus). By running similar bibliometric analyses on OpenAlex data, researchers can perform comparative analysis and check for coverage differences.

Review Questions

  1. What steps in VOSviewer are required to retrieve OpenAlex data through an API and convert it into an analyzable bibliographic dataset?
  2. How do author co-authorship networks differ from bibliographic coupling networks in what they reveal about research structure?
  3. Which query settings (e.g., full text vs. abstract) would you adjust if you wanted to change the thematic focus of the retrieved documents?

Key Points

  1. 1

    VOSviewer can generate bibliometric maps using OpenAlex metadata retrieved via an API, avoiding manual dataset handling.

  2. 2

    The API workflow supports query configuration across fields like title, abstract, and full text, plus classification narrowing and typo handling.

  3. 3

    After retrieval, VOSviewer converts the OpenAlex metadata into a format suitable for network analysis and visualization.

  4. 4

    Author co-authorship mapping uses configurable thresholds (minimum documents per author) to build an author network.

  5. 5

    Bibliographic coupling links documents based on shared references, helping reveal topic clusters and document interconnections.

  6. 6

    Outputs can be saved, screenshotted, and shared, making it easier to incorporate maps into literature review workflows.

  7. 7

    OpenAlex’s free access supports comparative validation against paid databases such as Web of Science or Scopus.

Highlights

The pipeline uses VOSviewer’s “download data through API” to pull OpenAlex records directly, then runs bibliometric analysis on the retrieved set.
An example query (“ECG signal”) produced 770 documents, which were then used to build an author network and coupling-based visualizations.
Bibliographic coupling is presented as a practical way to compare and validate research themes by examining shared reference structures.

Topics

Mentioned

  • API