Anti-Gravity Wheel?
Based on Veritasium's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
A 19-kilogram flywheel mounted on a shaft is extremely difficult to hold horizontally or lift overhead when stationary.
Briefing
A 19-kilogram flywheel can feel dramatically “lighter” when it spins—so much so that a person can lift it one-handed over their head while the shaft stays nearly level. The setup uses a heavy flywheel mounted on a meter-long shaft. Held horizontally by one end, the apparatus is essentially impossible to support steadily by hand when stationary, but once spun up to a few thousand RPM, the shaft remains horizontal and the wheel’s behavior looks almost weightless.
The effect comes from rotational dynamics rather than any anti-gravity force. Instead of the wheel simply pulling downward under gravity, its spinning mass generates torque that drives gyroscopic precession: the system responds to applied forces by redirecting motion in a way that resists the change in the wheel’s orientation. In practice, that means the shaft tends to maintain its horizontal attitude when the spinning wheel is released from one hand, creating the visual impression that the wheel is not “falling” in the usual way.
The experiment then escalates from holding the shaft out horizontally to lifting the spinning flywheel overhead with one hand. First, the team checks the baseline: lifting the 19-kilogram wheel above the head without spinning is extremely difficult, requiring awkward effort and only barely achievable. After that, the flywheel is spun as fast as possible to maximize the stabilizing effect. With the wheel rotating, the lift becomes noticeably easier and feels “incredibly light,” with the lifter reporting that the apparatus seems to want to rise rather than requiring the expected force to support a 40-pound mass.
To separate perception from physics, the experiment introduces a scale measurement. The lifter’s body weight is about 72 kilograms on the scale. When the flywheel is lifted overhead without spinning, the reading rises to roughly 91 kilograms—consistent with adding the flywheel’s mass (about 19 kilograms). The next step is to spin the flywheel and test whether the scale reading changes while the apparatus is held overhead. The key question is whether rotation reduces the effective weight on the scale (a “lighter” reading) or whether the scale still registers essentially the same total load, despite the ease of lifting.
The central takeaway is that spinning can strongly alter how forces are transmitted through a rotating system—making it feel easier to hold—without implying true weightlessness. The planned scale test is designed to determine whether the “lightness” is purely mechanical/kinematic (how the hand and shaft experience forces) or whether it actually changes the force measured as weight.
Cornell Notes
A 19-kilogram flywheel on a meter-long shaft is hard to hold horizontally or lift overhead when stationary. Once spun to a few thousand RPM, the shaft stays level and the flywheel feels dramatically easier to lift one-handed, suggesting an “anti-gravity” illusion. The mechanism is gyroscopic precession: the spinning wheel generates torque that resists changes to its orientation, redirecting applied forces. To check whether this changes true weight, the experiment uses a scale: body weight is about 72 kg, and adding the flywheel brings the reading to about 91 kg. The next measurement after spinning tests whether the scale reading drops, which would indicate a real change in effective load rather than just altered force feel.
Why does the spinning flywheel keep the shaft nearly horizontal when released from one hand?
How is the experiment set up to test “anti-gravity” claims?
What baseline comparison is made before attempting the overhead lift?
Why does the overhead lift feel easier when the flywheel is spinning?
How does the scale measurement distinguish between perception and actual weight?
Review Questions
- If the flywheel is spinning, what physical effect (by name) helps resist changes in the shaft’s orientation?
- What scale readings would you expect if the flywheel’s “lightness” is only a force-transmission effect versus a true reduction in effective weight?
- Why does the experiment include a non-spinning overhead lift attempt before spinning the flywheel?
Key Points
- 1
A 19-kilogram flywheel mounted on a shaft is extremely difficult to hold horizontally or lift overhead when stationary.
- 2
Spinning the flywheel to a few thousand RPM makes the shaft stay level, creating an apparent “weightless” look.
- 3
The stabilizing behavior is explained by gyroscopic precession: spinning torque redirects the response to applied forces.
- 4
The overhead lift becomes noticeably easier when spinning, indicating that the forces experienced by the hand can differ from the forces implied by static weight.
- 5
A scale test is used to check whether rotation changes the measured load: body weight is ~72 kg and body plus flywheel is ~91 kg.
- 6
The crucial unresolved question is whether spinning reduces the scale reading (effective weight) or leaves it essentially unchanged despite the easier lift.