Black Holes Could Explain Dark Energy
Based on Sabine Hossenfelder's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Cosmologically coupled black holes propose that black holes expand with the universe, leading to mass growth that can mimic dark energy’s non-diluting behavior.
Briefing
Dark energy may be explainable by black holes—specifically a scenario where black holes “feel” the universe’s expansion, causing their masses to grow and thereby mimicking the behavior of dark energy. In this picture, black holes expand along with the cosmos; as their mass increases, the effective energy density associated with them does not dilute as space expands. That mechanism naturally predicts dark energy should weaken over time, because black hole formation is tied to the history of star collapse: the early universe produces black holes in bursts, then the rate slows as fewer stars form and collapse.
The new push for this idea comes from an analysis using DESI (Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument), a galaxy survey telescope at Kitt Peak, Arizona. DESI targets baryon acoustic oscillations—galaxy clustering patterns imprinted by sound waves in the early universe’s hot plasma. Dark energy changes how those patterns evolve with time, so measuring the oscillation signatures across different galaxy ages lets researchers track whether dark energy is constant or changing.
DESI previously found evidence that dark energy is weakening, and the latest analysis checks how well “cosmologically coupled black holes” reproduce that trend. The results are mixed but intriguing: the standard cosmological model, often summarized as lambdaCDM, fits the weakening signal poorly, while the black-hole-based alternative fits somewhat better. Yet when the full statistics are worked through, the improvement is not decisive—both models end up about equally acceptable or unacceptable once the trade-offs are accounted for.
Where the black-hole scenario gains traction is elsewhere. It also helps with a separate observational issue: the “tension” in the Hubble rate, meaning different measurements of the universe’s expansion rate disagree more than expected. The analysis reports that the cosmologically coupled black hole model uses about the same number of parameters as lambdaCDM and matches the DESI data as well as, or slightly better than, the standard approach.
Despite the data-level promise, the theoretical case is shaky. Galaxies themselves are not directly coupled to cosmological expansion, so it’s unclear why black holes inside them would be. There’s also a major consistency problem: if black hole masses really grow as the model requires, it would raise the black hole merger rate. A prior study found that the resulting merger rate would conflict with what gravitational-wave interferometers observe—an outcome summarized as the theory being “eaten by the data.” The overall assessment is that the idea is far from settled: it fits the cosmological measurements competitively, but it faces serious physical objections that could undermine it unless the underlying theory is repaired or the interpretation changes.
In short, cosmologically coupled black holes offer a plausible alternative explanation for weakening dark energy and may ease the Hubble tension, but the mechanism’s compatibility with astrophysical and gravitational-wave observations remains the central hurdle.
Cornell Notes
Cosmologically coupled black holes propose that black holes expand with the universe, so their mass grows as space expands. Because black hole mass growth would not dilute like ordinary energy, the effect can mimic dark energy—and it predicts dark energy should weaken over time since black hole formation tracks the star-formation history (high early, slower later). DESI measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations provide a test: the weakening signal fits somewhat better with the black-hole model than with lambdaCDM, though the statistical advantage largely washes out. The same model also helps with the Hubble-rate tension. The main concern is theoretical and astrophysical consistency: galaxies aren’t expected to couple to expansion, and mass growth would imply a higher black hole merger rate than gravitational-wave observations allow.
How can black holes mimic dark energy in the cosmologically coupled scenario?
Why does the black-hole idea predict dark energy should weaken over time?
What does DESI measure to infer changes in dark energy?
What did the DESI-based comparison find between lambdaCDM and the black-hole model?
Why is the cosmologically coupled black-hole theory considered problematic despite the fit?
Review Questions
- What specific mechanism in cosmologically coupled black holes prevents the associated energy from diluting as the universe expands?
- How do baryon acoustic oscillations let DESI constrain whether dark energy weakens over time?
- What observational constraint from gravitational-wave detections challenges the black-hole mass-growth idea?
Key Points
- 1
Cosmologically coupled black holes propose that black holes expand with the universe, leading to mass growth that can mimic dark energy’s non-diluting behavior.
- 2
Because black hole formation follows the star-collapse history, the model predicts dark energy should weaken as the black hole formation rate declines over cosmic time.
- 3
DESI uses baryon acoustic oscillations—early-universe sound-wave imprints in galaxy clustering—to track how dark energy changes with time.
- 4
DESI’s latest comparison finds the black-hole model fits the weakening trend somewhat better than lambdaCDM, but the statistical advantage largely cancels out after accounting for trade-offs.
- 5
The black-hole scenario also offers relief for the Hubble-rate tension while using a similar parameter count to lambdaCDM.
- 6
Major theoretical and astrophysical objections remain: unclear coupling of black holes to cosmological expansion and a predicted merger-rate increase that conflicts with gravitational-wave observations.