Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Build a Second Brain? | Game-Changing Way to Organize Your Notes | Notion Template Tour thumbnail

Build a Second Brain? | Game-Changing Way to Organize Your Notes | Notion Template Tour

5 min read

Based on The Organized Notebook's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Use the Notes Inbox as a temporary holding area for anything not yet tagged to Projects, Areas, or Resources.

Briefing

A “second brain” in Notion is built around one practical idea: keep notes from turning into a pile by routing every item into Projects, Areas, Resources, or an Archive—then run scheduled reviews to keep the system alive. The template tour centers on Tiago Forte’s concept of separating knowledge into meaningful buckets so new notes land in the right place, unfinished items stay visible, and completed or irrelevant material can be stashed away.

The interface is organized with a left navigation menu that jumps to Mobile View, Inbox, Projects, Areas, Resources, Archive, and review pages for Weekly and Monthly check-ins. A key structural element is the Notes Inbox, which acts as a holding area for anything not yet tagged to a folder. From there, users can either tag notes into the correct database or leave them in the inbox until they’re sorted. The template also includes prebuilt databases that shouldn’t be deleted because they power the folder logic and review workflows.

Folders are the backbone of the system, and the tour walks through four main categories. Projects are goal-driven efforts like “write a book,” complete with start and end dates, tags, and fields such as a project description, important questions, an action checklist, and an archive review. Areas represent ongoing parts of life to improve—such as “family”—with fields like current reflection, important questions, and an archive review, but without a required timeline. Resources store general topics to study, like “languages,” again with reflection prompts and important questions to guide note-taking. Finally, Archive/Done provides a place to remove clutter once a project, area, or set of notes is no longer active; items can be moved back to active if needed.

Note capture is designed to be flexible. New notes can be added through the Notes Inbox, where users fill in properties like web bookmarks, embeds, URLs, source type (e.g., web article), key points, tags, and files/media. If a note is tagged to a folder, it automatically appears inside that folder’s database. If the right category isn’t clear yet, the note stays in the inbox until tagging is done. Notes can also be created directly inside a folder, ensuring they land in the correct place from the start.

The template adds a quality-control loop through “needs review” and archiving. Notes marked with a review checkbox surface in a dedicated needs review section; once reviewed, checking it off removes it from that queue. Archiving notes hides them from the main views and reduces the active note count, helping users weed out material that no longer matters.

Weekly and monthly reviews turn the system into a routine rather than a one-time setup. The weekly checklist instructs users to process the inbox (tag notes into folders or archive them), confirm active folders still match current life priorities, decide whether to archive/complete outdated folders, and scan for inspiration by randomly reviewing notes. The review also includes reflection prompts about what went well, what could improve, and what new connections emerged. Monthly reviews repeat the same structure on a larger cadence.

For on-the-go capture, a simplified Mobile View keeps the workflow intact: quick notes can be added immediately, then later categorized on desktop so they enter the correct Projects, Areas, or Resources. The result is a second brain that balances fast capture with deliberate organization and periodic cleanup.

Cornell Notes

The template implements a “second brain” in Notion by routing every note into one of four buckets: Projects (goal-based), Areas (ongoing life improvements), Resources (topic learning), or Archive/Done (inactive material). Notes start in an Inbox when they aren’t tagged yet, then get moved during Weekly and Monthly reviews. A “needs review” checkbox creates a queue for items that must be revisited, while archiving removes clutter from main views. The system matters because it prevents knowledge from accumulating without structure, and it keeps folders aligned with changing priorities through recurring checklists and reflection prompts.

How does the template prevent new notes from becoming disorganized?

All uncategorized items land in the Notes Inbox until they’re tagged to a folder. During Weekly review, the checklist explicitly directs users to check the inbox and either move notes into the correct Projects/Areas/Resources or archive them. This creates a clear workflow: capture quickly, then categorize later when context is available.

What’s the difference between Projects, Areas, and Resources in this system?

Projects are specific goals with start/end dates and fields like a project description, important questions, an action checklist, and an archive review (example given: writing a book). Areas are ongoing aspects of life to improve, such as family, with current reflection and important questions, but no required timeline. Resources are general topics for study—like languages—tracked with reflection prompts and important questions, plus notes tied to that topic.

What role do “needs review” and archiving play?

Notes marked with a “needs review” checkbox appear in a dedicated needs review section. After reviewing, checking it off removes it from that queue, making revisit tasks visible and manageable. Archiving hides notes from main views and reduces active note counts, letting users remove items that are no longer relevant while still keeping them accessible in Archive/Done.

Why are Weekly and Monthly reviews central to the template’s design?

Reviews turn organization into a recurring habit. The weekly checklist includes processing the inbox, verifying active folders still match current life priorities, archiving/completing outdated folders, scanning notes for inspiration, and reflecting on what went well and what could improve. Monthly review repeats the same checklist structure over a longer time window and adds monthly reflection.

How does the template support capturing notes on a phone without breaking the system?

Mobile View provides a simplified interface focused on quick capture via an “add new note” button. Notes created on mobile appear later in the main desktop view’s inbox, where users can tag them into the correct folder databases (Projects, Areas, or Resources) when they’re back at their computer.

Review Questions

  1. If a note is created but the correct folder isn’t clear yet, where does it go and what happens later?
  2. During a Weekly review, which steps ensure folders stay relevant and inbox items don’t linger?
  3. How do Projects, Areas, and Resources differ in required fields and intended purpose?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Use the Notes Inbox as a temporary holding area for anything not yet tagged to Projects, Areas, or Resources.

  2. 2

    Build your system around four folder types: Projects (goals with dates), Areas (ongoing life improvements), Resources (topic learning), and Archive/Done (inactive items).

  3. 3

    Tag notes to folders to route them automatically; leave them untagged only when categorization can’t be decided immediately.

  4. 4

    Mark items with “needs review” to create a revisit queue, and check them off after review to keep the queue current.

  5. 5

    Archive notes and folders to reduce clutter, with the option to move items back to active if priorities change.

  6. 6

    Run Weekly and Monthly reviews to process the inbox, validate folder relevance, and reflect on progress and new connections.

  7. 7

    Capture on mobile with quick notes, then categorize on desktop so the second brain stays structured over time.

Highlights

The template’s core workflow is capture-to-inbox, then categorize during Weekly review—so notes don’t accumulate without context.
Projects, Areas, and Resources separate goal work, life improvement, and learning topics, each with tailored fields like dates for Projects and reflection prompts for Areas/Resources.
A “needs review” checkbox creates an explicit queue for revisit tasks, while archiving removes inactive material from main views.
Weekly review includes both operational cleanup (inbox sorting, folder relevance checks) and creative scanning for inspiration.
Mobile View keeps capture fast, but desktop tagging ensures notes still land in the correct databases later.