Build your own local o1 - here’s how
Based on David Ondrej's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Use Ollama to run Neotron 70B Instruct locally, with Llama 3.2 as a smaller fallback for weaker hardware.
Briefing
A practical recipe for building a “local o1-style” reasoning assistant is laid out end-to-end: run an open reasoning-capable model locally, prompt it to think step-by-step, then boost reliability by splitting work across multiple specialized agents. The payoff is a private, subscription-free alternative to hosted reasoning models—using a laptop or desktop—while still getting structured, multi-step outputs that resemble o1’s longer deliberation.
The walkthrough starts by reframing what “o1” is: a reasoning model that spends roughly 10–60 seconds thinking before answering, using advanced prompting techniques such as Chain of Thought. It then tackles why a local version is hard: the model footprint is large (compute and cost), hosted options can impose message caps (30 messages/week is cited), and cloud systems expose user data. The proposed solution is to use an open model that can run locally—specifically Nvidia’s Neotron 70B Instruct (built on the Llama 3.1 architecture and described as open source). For weaker hardware, the fallback is Llama 3.2 (the transcript mentions smaller sizes like 3B).
Chain of Thought prompting is presented as the key mechanism for turning instant answers into stepwise reasoning. The method is illustrated with a “solve step by step” style prompt and an analogy: writing intermediate steps on paper reduces mistakes compared with answering immediately. But prompting alone isn’t treated as sufficient. The build adds a second ingredient: an “agent team” approach. Instead of one model handling the entire problem, the system creates multiple agents, each responsible for one step of the reasoning pipeline. The transcript compares this to an assembly line—specialization increases the chance of arriving at a correct, coherent result while using the same underlying LLM.
Implementation details follow. The user installs an app called Ollama (the transcript repeatedly clarifies it’s Ollama, not OpenAI), then downloads Neotron 70B via Ollama’s model interface. A terminal-based workflow is used to pull the model (the transcript cites a ~43GB download for first-time setup) and to verify it responds correctly. Next comes Python integration: install the Ollama package with pip, then call the model from code (the transcript uses Cursor as the coding environment).
The core “local o1” assistant is built in stages. First, a single-file local completion test confirms the model runs. Then the assistant is upgraded with Chain of Thought-style prompting and a system prompt that instructs the model to behave like a reasoning assistant and to be concise enough to avoid excessive runtime. Finally, the multi-agent system is introduced: a “CEO agent” generates an initial plan, specialized agents implement designated steps, and a “COO” agent summarizes the combined outputs into a final strategy. The transcript also includes performance tuning: using Neotron for the plan (more capable) and Llama 3.2 for faster step execution, with an option to switch everything to the smaller model for speed.
The result is a working local “o1-like” assistant that can generate structured plans (examples include a 7-day workout plan and a 14-day guitar learning plan), save the final output to a text file, and run without sending prompts to a hosted service. All prompts and code are promised for later reuse in a “Society” templates area.
Cornell Notes
The transcript shows how to build a local, o1-like reasoning assistant by combining three elements: (1) run an open reasoning-capable model locally (Neotron 70B Instruct via Ollama, with Llama 3.2 as a smaller fallback), (2) prompt for step-by-step Chain of Thought reasoning, and (3) improve reliability by splitting the task across multiple specialized agents. A “CEO agent” produces an initial plan, step-specific agents implement each part, and a “COO agent” merges everything into a final concise strategy. The approach matters because it aims to deliver private, subscription-free reasoning on a personal machine while avoiding cloud message caps and data exposure. Performance tuning is emphasized by using the faster model for sub-tasks and reserving the larger model for planning and synthesis.
What makes the build “o1-like,” and what parts are actually implemented locally?
Why does Chain of Thought prompting matter for accuracy, according to the transcript’s examples?
How does the multi-agent “team” improve results compared with one model handling everything?
What are the hardware and model choices, and how do they affect speed?
What does the setup process look like before any Python coding?
How is the final output produced and saved?
Review Questions
- If you only had time to run one model locally, which stage(s) would you prioritize for the larger model to maximize plan quality, and why?
- How would you modify the agent prompts to reduce overly generic plans when the user provides limited preferences?
- What failure mode might occur if you remove the “only focus on your assigned step” instruction for each specialized agent?
Key Points
- 1
Use Ollama to run Neotron 70B Instruct locally, with Llama 3.2 as a smaller fallback for weaker hardware.
- 2
Prompt for Chain of Thought-style step-by-step reasoning to get structured outputs rather than instant answers.
- 3
Improve reliability by splitting work across specialized agents (CEO for planning, step agents for execution, COO for synthesis).
- 4
Tune performance by assigning the larger model to planning/synthesis and smaller models to faster step execution.
- 5
Integrate the local model in Python via the Ollama package (pip install) and call the model with the correct model name.
- 6
Save the final consolidated plan to a text file so the assistant behaves like a usable local tool, not just a chat demo.