Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Fiction  Project Management thumbnail

Fiction Project Management

5 min read

Based on Obsidian Community Talks's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Collect nonfiction-driven inspiration, then distill it into claims and questions that can be repurposed into story concepts, characters, and world details.

Briefing

Project management in Obsidian for fiction writers hinges on one practical idea: treat inspiration and drafts as reusable assets, then use folders plus Dataview-style summaries to decide what’s ready to ship when deadlines hit. The workflow starts with a steady pipeline—collect nonfiction-driven inspiration, distill it into claims and questions, and keep adding snippets as life and research continue—so writing never begins from a blank page. When a submission window opens, the writer searches the existing notes for what best matches the call, updates metadata, and “ships” the piece, moving it into a completed state.

A key theme is that inspiration isn’t just aesthetic; it’s structural. The notes system is built around how fiction becomes deeper and more realistic through lived experience and research. Nonfiction reading gets converted into usable material: distilled claims and questions that can be mapped onto story concepts, characters, or world details. Prompts also play a role—short daily prompts and customizable plugins help generate fresh angles, and the speaker compares the effect to “prompt bingos,” where a 5x5 grid forces variety and prevents the brain from recycling the same ideas.

Organization is where the system becomes project-management, not just note-taking. Folders are positioned as the backbone for complex workflows: they separate inputs (imports from Readwise and Zotero, journaling, idea dumps) from more developed work (character profiles, worldbuilding notes), and they also track lifecycle states like deleted scenes and completed drafts. The writer separates Markdown notes from publication-ready formats that flow through Pandoc, arguing that folders make it easier to interact with external tooling and to click “complete” when something is ready rather than relying on slow searches.

Instead of building a full “world bible” wiki, the approach favors minimal, need-based notes. The system avoids spending hours maintaining encyclopedic documentation that may not pay off. Notes get written when forgetting is likely or when consolidation becomes necessary—especially when multiple story threads share a universe and interlink in complicated ways.

Dataview is presented as the differentiator for fiction tracking. Tags can indicate attributes, but Dataview can surface meaningful summaries and richer metadata in tables—turning notes into a navigable index of chapters and stories. That matters for shared-world short fiction, where keeping track of protagonists, timelines, locations, and interconnections would be difficult without queryable summaries. Sorting by file size also supports “incremental writing”: rough ideas can be dumped early, then later prioritized by what’s closest to being shippable.

Finally, the system extends beyond drafts into submission operations and marketing. Links to email chains keep pitches organized without wrestling with email folders, and templates track what’s suitable for which markets. Marketing advice is less about growth hacks and more about record-keeping and audience fit: track where content was shared to avoid duplication, find communities like Reddit subreddits where interest is specific, and use newsletters as a way to reach readers without algorithm volatility. The overall message is pragmatic—build a system that helps decide what to write next, what to polish, and what to send, using Obsidian’s structure to reduce wasted time under real deadlines.

Cornell Notes

The core workflow turns fiction writing into a repeatable project system inside Obsidian. Inspiration is collected (often from nonfiction), distilled into claims and questions, and continuously expanded with snippets so drafts can be built quickly when submission windows open. Folders manage lifecycle and tooling needs—inputs, in-progress work, deleted scenes, completed drafts, and publication formats that go through Pandoc—so “ready to ship” is a click, not a search. Dataview then provides the project-management layer: tables can show story summaries and structured metadata (characters, locations, timelines), enabling incremental writing and easier navigation across a shared universe. Marketing and submissions are also tracked via templates and linked email chains to reduce wasted effort and prevent duplicate sharing.

How does the system make writing faster when a submission window opens?

It relies on pre-existing assets. Nonfiction inspiration gets distilled into claims and questions, then mapped to story concepts, characters, and world details. As life continues, new snippets and connections get added to the same notes. When a call for submissions arrives, the writer searches the existing notes for what best matches the prompt, updates metadata (status and fit), and then ships the draft—rather than starting from scratch under time pressure.

Why are folders treated as essential for fiction project management in Obsidian?

Folders separate both purpose and lifecycle. Inputs (imports from Readwise and Zotero, journaling, idea dumps) live higher up; more developed material like character profiles and worldbuilding sits in the middle; and lifecycle states like deleted scenes and completed work are separated into their own folders. This also supports external tooling: publication drafts are kept in formats that work with Pandoc, and “click complete” becomes faster than searching for readiness.

What’s the tradeoff between building a full world wiki and keeping notes lightweight?

A full “world bible” wiki is seen as costly in time and requires constant decisions about whether the documentation effort is worthwhile. Instead, the system keeps notes genuinely minimal—written when forgetting is likely or when consolidation is needed. The goal is to spend time on producing the story, not maintaining an encyclopedic reference that may never be used.

How does Dataview improve tracking compared with tags alone?

Tags can label attributes, but Dataview can display summaries and richer metadata in tables. That means a table can show a sentence-level description of what a story or chapter is about (not just “character X” or “location Y”). For shared-world short fiction, Dataview helps surface which stories take place in a location, which protagonists appear, and how chapters interrelate—making complex universe management feasible.

What does “incremental writing” look like in practice?

Ideas are dumped into notes as they appear, then later prioritized when deadlines approach. Dataview queries can sort by file size so more developed drafts rise to the top. The writer can then pick the easiest thing to ship, polish it, and send it—turning early rough notes into a queue of near-finished work.

How does the system handle submissions and marketing without duplicating effort?

Email organization is handled by linking to relevant email chains inside Obsidian, supporting an “inbox zero” approach rather than maintaining complex email folders. For marketing, the writer tracks where each piece was shared (at the top of files) to avoid reposting the same content to the same communities. Audience discovery is also community-driven: Reddit subreddits are highlighted as interest-specific places to find readers, and newsletters are used to reach people without relying on algorithm-driven feeds.

Review Questions

  1. What specific role do folders play in the workflow beyond simple categorization?
  2. How does Dataview enable shared-world tracking that tags alone cannot?
  3. What mechanisms prevent wasted time during submission deadlines and marketing duplication?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Collect nonfiction-driven inspiration, then distill it into claims and questions that can be repurposed into story concepts, characters, and world details.

  2. 2

    Use folders to manage both lifecycle states (deleted scenes, completed drafts) and tooling needs (Markdown vs Pandoc-ready formats).

  3. 3

    Avoid building an exhaustive world wiki; write only the notes needed to prevent forgetting or to consolidate when overwhelmed.

  4. 4

    Use Dataview tables to surface story summaries and structured metadata, enabling navigation across a shared universe.

  5. 5

    Support incremental writing by dumping ideas early and later sorting/prioritizing drafts by development signals like file size.

  6. 6

    Track submission operations by linking to email chains in Obsidian, reducing reliance on complex email organization.

  7. 7

    For marketing, keep a record of where content was shared to avoid duplication, and focus on communities where interest is specific (e.g., Reddit subreddits).

Highlights

Folders are positioned as the backbone for complex fiction workflows—especially when “ready to ship” needs to be determined quickly.
Dataview turns notes into a queryable index: summaries and metadata in tables make shared-world management practical.
The approach rejects a full world-bible wiki in favor of need-based notes to protect time for writing.
Incremental writing is supported by sorting drafts (e.g., by file size) so deadlines can be met by picking the most shippable work.
Marketing is treated as record-keeping plus audience fit: track sharing locations and lean into interest-specific communities like Reddit.

Topics

  • Fiction Project Management
  • Obsidian Folders
  • Dataview Queries
  • Incremental Writing
  • Fiction Submissions
  • Newsletter Marketing

Mentioned

  • API
  • URI
  • URL
  • Dataview
  • PDF
  • TLS