Fiction Project Management
Based on Obsidian Community Talks's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Collect nonfiction-driven inspiration, then distill it into claims and questions that can be repurposed into story concepts, characters, and world details.
Briefing
Project management in Obsidian for fiction writers hinges on one practical idea: treat inspiration and drafts as reusable assets, then use folders plus Dataview-style summaries to decide what’s ready to ship when deadlines hit. The workflow starts with a steady pipeline—collect nonfiction-driven inspiration, distill it into claims and questions, and keep adding snippets as life and research continue—so writing never begins from a blank page. When a submission window opens, the writer searches the existing notes for what best matches the call, updates metadata, and “ships” the piece, moving it into a completed state.
A key theme is that inspiration isn’t just aesthetic; it’s structural. The notes system is built around how fiction becomes deeper and more realistic through lived experience and research. Nonfiction reading gets converted into usable material: distilled claims and questions that can be mapped onto story concepts, characters, or world details. Prompts also play a role—short daily prompts and customizable plugins help generate fresh angles, and the speaker compares the effect to “prompt bingos,” where a 5x5 grid forces variety and prevents the brain from recycling the same ideas.
Organization is where the system becomes project-management, not just note-taking. Folders are positioned as the backbone for complex workflows: they separate inputs (imports from Readwise and Zotero, journaling, idea dumps) from more developed work (character profiles, worldbuilding notes), and they also track lifecycle states like deleted scenes and completed drafts. The writer separates Markdown notes from publication-ready formats that flow through Pandoc, arguing that folders make it easier to interact with external tooling and to click “complete” when something is ready rather than relying on slow searches.
Instead of building a full “world bible” wiki, the approach favors minimal, need-based notes. The system avoids spending hours maintaining encyclopedic documentation that may not pay off. Notes get written when forgetting is likely or when consolidation becomes necessary—especially when multiple story threads share a universe and interlink in complicated ways.
Dataview is presented as the differentiator for fiction tracking. Tags can indicate attributes, but Dataview can surface meaningful summaries and richer metadata in tables—turning notes into a navigable index of chapters and stories. That matters for shared-world short fiction, where keeping track of protagonists, timelines, locations, and interconnections would be difficult without queryable summaries. Sorting by file size also supports “incremental writing”: rough ideas can be dumped early, then later prioritized by what’s closest to being shippable.
Finally, the system extends beyond drafts into submission operations and marketing. Links to email chains keep pitches organized without wrestling with email folders, and templates track what’s suitable for which markets. Marketing advice is less about growth hacks and more about record-keeping and audience fit: track where content was shared to avoid duplication, find communities like Reddit subreddits where interest is specific, and use newsletters as a way to reach readers without algorithm volatility. The overall message is pragmatic—build a system that helps decide what to write next, what to polish, and what to send, using Obsidian’s structure to reduce wasted time under real deadlines.
Cornell Notes
The core workflow turns fiction writing into a repeatable project system inside Obsidian. Inspiration is collected (often from nonfiction), distilled into claims and questions, and continuously expanded with snippets so drafts can be built quickly when submission windows open. Folders manage lifecycle and tooling needs—inputs, in-progress work, deleted scenes, completed drafts, and publication formats that go through Pandoc—so “ready to ship” is a click, not a search. Dataview then provides the project-management layer: tables can show story summaries and structured metadata (characters, locations, timelines), enabling incremental writing and easier navigation across a shared universe. Marketing and submissions are also tracked via templates and linked email chains to reduce wasted effort and prevent duplicate sharing.
How does the system make writing faster when a submission window opens?
Why are folders treated as essential for fiction project management in Obsidian?
What’s the tradeoff between building a full world wiki and keeping notes lightweight?
How does Dataview improve tracking compared with tags alone?
What does “incremental writing” look like in practice?
How does the system handle submissions and marketing without duplicating effort?
Review Questions
- What specific role do folders play in the workflow beyond simple categorization?
- How does Dataview enable shared-world tracking that tags alone cannot?
- What mechanisms prevent wasted time during submission deadlines and marketing duplication?
Key Points
- 1
Collect nonfiction-driven inspiration, then distill it into claims and questions that can be repurposed into story concepts, characters, and world details.
- 2
Use folders to manage both lifecycle states (deleted scenes, completed drafts) and tooling needs (Markdown vs Pandoc-ready formats).
- 3
Avoid building an exhaustive world wiki; write only the notes needed to prevent forgetting or to consolidate when overwhelmed.
- 4
Use Dataview tables to surface story summaries and structured metadata, enabling navigation across a shared universe.
- 5
Support incremental writing by dumping ideas early and later sorting/prioritizing drafts by development signals like file size.
- 6
Track submission operations by linking to email chains in Obsidian, reducing reliance on complex email organization.
- 7
For marketing, keep a record of where content was shared to avoid duplication, and focus on communities where interest is specific (e.g., Reddit subreddits).