Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
How did they actually take this picture? (Very Long Baseline Interferometry) thumbnail

How did they actually take this picture? (Very Long Baseline Interferometry)

Veritasium·
6 min read

Based on Veritasium's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Sagittarius A* appears only slightly larger than M87* from Earth because it is about 2,000 times closer but over 1,000 times smaller, and its environment blocks visible light.

Briefing

The Event Horizon Telescope’s black-hole images are possible only because Earth-based radio observatories act together like an Earth-sized telescope, using very long baseline interferometry to sharpen radio-wave measurements to the scale of a black hole’s “shadow.” Sagittarius A*—the supermassive black hole at the Milky Way’s center—was especially hard: it sits behind thick dust and gas that blocks visible light, it is over 1,000 times smaller than M87* (so it appears only slightly larger from Earth), and its accretion flow changes on minute timescales. Yet the collaboration still produced a ring-like silhouette by observing at radio wavelengths of 1.3 millimeters, where the surrounding plasma is detectable even though the black hole itself emits no light.

The core technical trick starts with angular resolution, the ability to distinguish tiny structure on the sky. A single radio dish can’t resolve the ring structure of a black hole because its resolution is too coarse; as a telescope scans across the target, it would blur together signals from different parts of the black hole. Shorter wavelengths could, in principle, improve resolution, but Earth’s atmosphere and the black hole’s environment block those options. Instead, resolution is boosted by effectively increasing the telescope’s diameter. The Event Horizon Telescope accomplishes this not with one giant dish, but by linking widely separated dishes across the planet—up to distances comparable to Earth’s diameter—so their combined signals reproduce the interference pattern an Earth-sized instrument would generate.

Each observatory records the incoming radio signal locally along with extremely precise timing (to the femtosecond). The data can’t be combined in real time because the signals arrive at different places, so petabytes of recordings are shipped to central processing sites. The imaging step then relies on interference fringes: pairs of telescopes separated by different distances and orientations produce different bright-and-dark patterns depending on the wavefront’s phase and the source’s position. By collecting many such patterns across a global network, the system reconstructs a high-resolution image that no single telescope could produce.

What the “black shadow” corresponds to is subtler than the event horizon itself. Space-time curvature bends light rays, so photons that skim near the black hole can either fall in or escape depending on their approach angle. The resulting dark region is set by the photon sphere: light can orbit at about 1.5 Schwarzschild radii, but that orbit is unstable. Rays that just graze the photon sphere form a shadow whose diameter is about 2.6 times the event horizon’s radius. In that sense, the center of the shadow maps to the event horizon, while the surrounding darkness reflects how many light paths are swallowed.

The bright ring and asymmetries come from the accretion disk’s hot, fast-moving plasma. Matter orbits at significant fractions of the speed of light, so relativistic (Doppler) beaming makes the side moving toward Earth brighter than the side moving away. Depending on viewing angle, gravitational lensing can also reveal the “backside” of the accretion disk and even multiple, nested images of the event horizon—light that loops around the black hole before reaching the telescopes. The final picture is therefore not a direct photograph of a black hole, but a map of how curved space-time and relativistic plasma dynamics shape the paths and brightness of incoming radio-emitting light.

Cornell Notes

The Event Horizon Telescope created black-hole images by observing Sagittarius A* at radio wavelengths of 1.3 millimeters and combining signals from a global network of dishes using very long baseline interferometry. No single telescope can resolve the ring-scale structure, so widely separated observatories provide the angular resolution an Earth-sized dish would have. Each site records the signal with femtosecond-accurate timing; later, interference fringes from many telescope pairs are combined to reconstruct the image. The dark “shadow” is not just the event horizon: gravitational lensing and unstable photon orbits produce a shadow about 2.6 times larger than the event horizon radius, while relativistic beaming from the fast accretion disk makes one side brighter.

Why can’t a single radio telescope on Earth directly resolve the ring around Sagittarius A*?

A black hole’s apparent size is tiny—comparable to imaging a donut on the Moon—so a single dish’s angular resolution is too large. As the telescope scans, it would still receive radio waves from multiple parts of the black hole simultaneously, producing a blurred blob rather than a distinct ring. Improving resolution by using shorter wavelengths isn’t feasible here because those wavelengths are blocked by Earth’s atmosphere and by intervening matter near the black hole.

How does very long baseline interferometry mimic an Earth-sized telescope?

Angular resolution improves with larger effective diameter. The Event Horizon Telescope achieves this by using many radio observatories separated by distances up to roughly Earth’s diameter. When signals from these separated telescopes are combined correctly, the constructive and destructive interference pattern matches what an Earth-sized dish would produce. The key is that each telescope records the signal locally with extremely precise timing (down to the femtosecond), enabling later reconstruction of the phase relationships.

What role do “fringes” play in turning raw telescope recordings into an image?

Two telescopes separated by a baseline receive the same wavefront with a time delay that depends on the source’s position. That produces a series of bright and dark interference fringes rather than a single location. Short baselines yield wide fringes; long baselines yield narrow fringes. To reconstruct a detailed image, the array needs many baselines at different orientations and distances so that all these different fringe patterns can be combined into a coherent picture.

What sets the size of the black hole’s shadow—event horizon or something else?

The shadow’s diameter is about 2.6 times the event horizon radius. Light paths are governed by the photon sphere: photons can orbit at roughly 1.5 Schwarzschild radii, but the orbit is unstable. Rays that come in at just the right angle graze the photon sphere and then escape, while slightly different angles send light into the black hole. Because of space-time curvature, the dark region corresponds to which light trajectories are captured, not simply to the event horizon boundary.

Why does the ring look brighter on one side?

The accretion disk’s plasma moves at significant fractions of the speed of light. When material moves toward the observer, relativistic (Doppler) beaming boosts its apparent brightness; when it moves away, it dims. That asymmetry produces a brighter region on one side of the ring.

How can an image reveal the “backside” of the event horizon or multiple rings?

Gravitational lensing bends light so rays can loop around the black hole and emerge from different directions. Light from behind the black hole can be redirected toward the telescopes, mapping the backside of the event horizon into the shadow region. With different looping paths, the horizon can appear in multiple nested annular rings as rays approach the shadow edge.

Review Questions

  1. What physical limitation prevents a single radio dish from resolving the black hole ring, and why can’t shorter wavelengths solve it?
  2. Explain how baseline length and orientation affect the interference fringes used to reconstruct an image.
  3. Why is the observed shadow diameter about 2.6 times the event horizon radius, and how does the photon sphere determine that scale?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Sagittarius A* appears only slightly larger than M87* from Earth because it is about 2,000 times closer but over 1,000 times smaller, and its environment blocks visible light.

  2. 2

    The Event Horizon Telescope images at radio wavelengths of 1.3 millimeters because that radiation can penetrate dust and gas and because shorter wavelengths are not practical from Earth.

  3. 3

    Angular resolution scales with wavelength and telescope diameter, so the array’s effective diameter must be increased to resolve the ring-scale structure.

  4. 4

    Very long baseline interferometry links widely separated telescopes so their combined interference pattern matches what an Earth-sized dish would achieve.

  5. 5

    Each observatory records signals locally with femtosecond-accurate timing; petabytes of data are later combined to reconstruct the image from many baseline-dependent fringes.

  6. 6

    The dark shadow size is set by photon trajectories near the unstable photon sphere, producing a shadow about 2.6 times larger than the event horizon radius.

  7. 7

    Relativistic beaming from the fast accretion disk and gravitational lensing determine the ring’s brightness asymmetry and the appearance of additional lensed features.

Highlights

The shadow’s diameter is about 2.6 times the event horizon radius because light bending and unstable photon orbits control which rays escape versus fall in.
The Event Horizon Telescope doesn’t need one giant dish; a global network of radio telescopes separated by Earth-sized baselines recreates Earth-level angular resolution.
Interference fringes from many telescope pairs—each with different baseline lengths and orientations—are the raw material for reconstructing the ring image.
Relativistic (Doppler) beaming makes one side of the accretion disk brighter, turning orbital motion into a visible brightness asymmetry.
Gravitational lensing can map the backside of the event horizon into the shadow and generate nested rings from multiple light paths.

Topics

Mentioned

  • Luciano Rezzolla
  • EHT