Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
How High Can We Build? thumbnail

How High Can We Build?

Vsauce·
5 min read

Based on Vsauce's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

A “building” is defined here as a structure where at least 50% of its height comes from habitable floor plates; otherwise it’s treated as a tower.

Briefing

Humanity’s tallest-built record has repeatedly shifted—not because people suddenly mastered higher buildings, but because the definition of “tallest” kept changing. For nearly 4,000 years, the Great Pyramid of Giza held the height crown at 147 meters, until England’s Lincoln Cathedral finally surpassed it in the 1300s. After that, a run of landmark structures followed: the Eiffel Tower became the tallest for about four decades, then the Chrysler Building took over, and the Empire State Building pushed the record further. The Empire State Building also introduced a striking physics milestone: if someone jumped from its top, they’d reach terminal velocity before hitting the ground, meaning the fall would stop accelerating and instead proceed at the fastest speed their body can sustain.

By the mid-1950s, the height race took a turn. Radio and TV towers could be far taller than habitable buildings because they didn’t need to be designed for people to live and work inside. That shift explains why modern icons—like the Petronas Towers, Taipei 101, the World Trade Center, and the Willis Tower—have never held the overall “tallest thing” title for long. Somewhere nearby, a radio or TV mast was always taller. The record then moved to extreme, non-building structures, culminating in the Warsaw radio mast in Poland, which stood as the tallest until a 1991 failure: workers mishandled guy-wires, the mast bent, and it snapped in the middle.

After the Warsaw mast fell, the KVLY-TV mast in North Dakota became the tallest standing human-made structure. But the conversation about height eventually returned to buildings, with the Burj Khalifa in Dubai becoming the current benchmark. Its scale isn’t just visual; it changes daily experience. Because the top is far enough above the base, the sunset timing differs so much that Dubai’s Islamic Affairs department issued Ramadan rules: people above floor 80 must wait 2–3 minutes after those at ground level to start eating, since the sun hasn’t set for them yet. The episode then uses the Burj Khalifa as a springboard to a broader idea: you can “double” sunrise or sunset by standing higher, even at the beach, and the timing difference can be used to estimate Earth’s radius.

The ultimate ceiling, however, isn’t a skyscraper—it’s space. As structures grow taller, they must support their own weight, but beyond a certain altitude the physics changes: at geostationary-orbit height, a new outward centrifugal effect appears alongside gravity. In principle, a structure that tall could be stable under tension and reach more than 35,000 km, forming a “Space Elevator.” The obstacle is materials: no known substance is strong enough for a feasible Earth-to-space tether, though carbon nanotubes or boron-nitrate nanotubes are discussed as potential candidates. The episode closes with why such a system matters: launching a pound into orbit costs roughly $11,000 today, but a space elevator could reduce that to about $100—an advantage so large that Philip Ragan argues the first country to deploy one could gain a 95% cost edge and potentially dominate space-related activity.

Cornell Notes

Tallness records shift depending on what counts as a “building.” Habitable structures dominated early history, with the Great Pyramid of Giza (147 m) holding the record for nearly 4,000 years. Once radio and TV towers arrived in the mid-1950s, non-habitable masts could surpass buildings, keeping the “tallest thing” title moving—until failures like the 1991 Warsaw radio mast collapse. The Burj Khalifa brought the focus back to buildings, even affecting Ramadan timing because sunset occurs minutes later at higher floors. Looking beyond skyscrapers, a space elevator could, in theory, be stable at geostationary altitude via tension, but it depends on materials strong enough to build a tether over 35,000 km.

Why did the “tallest” record stop belonging to habitable buildings after the mid-1950s?

Radio and TV towers could be much taller without needing habitable floor space. That meant the height race increasingly rewarded structures that didn’t have to support people and workplaces, so buildings like the Petronas Towers, Taipei 101, the World Trade Center, and the Willis Tower were often outpaced by nearby masts.

What physical milestone is tied to the Empire State Building’s height?

At the Empire State Building’s height, a person jumping from the top would reach terminal velocity before hitting the ground. Instead of continuing to accelerate, the fall would level off at the maximum speed their body can sustain.

What happened to the Warsaw radio mast in 1991, and why does it matter for the height story?

In 1991, workers exchanging guy-wires made a mistake. The mast began to bend and then snapped in the middle. The collapse illustrates how extreme height can turn into structural fragility, especially when tension systems like guy-wires fail.

How does the Burj Khalifa create a real-world timing difference for sunset?

The top of the Burj Khalifa is high enough that sunset occurs minutes later there than at the base. Dubai’s Islamic Affairs department issued Ramadan rules: people above floor 80 must wait 2–3 minutes after those at ground level to start eating because the sun hasn’t set for them yet.

How can a person at a beach “double” a sunset, and what does that enable mathematically?

By lying down and watching the sun set, then quickly standing as soon as the last sliver disappears below the horizon, the sun can appear to set again from the higher viewpoint. Measuring the time gap and the observer’s eye height difference can be used to calculate Earth’s radius. The idea is extended in the “Double Sunset Date” concept by using a cherry picker to raise the observer by about 6 feet.

Why is a space elevator theoretically stable, and what blocks it in practice?

At geostationary-orbit altitude, the structure would experience not only downward gravity but also an outward centrifugal effect, allowing stability through tension. The practical blocker is materials: no currently known material is strong enough for a feasible tether over 35,000 km, though carbon nanotubes or boron-nitrate nanotubes are mentioned as possible candidates.

Review Questions

  1. How does changing the definition of “tallest” (habitable building vs. non-habitable mast) alter which structures hold records over time?
  2. What role do tension and terminal velocity play in the story of extreme height, and where does each concept apply?
  3. Why does a space elevator require both a specific altitude regime and unusually strong materials?

Key Points

  1. 1

    A “building” is defined here as a structure where at least 50% of its height comes from habitable floor plates; otherwise it’s treated as a tower.

  2. 2

    The mid-1950s height race shifted toward radio and TV towers because they didn’t need to be habitable, letting them outgrow traditional buildings.

  3. 3

    The Empire State Building’s height is high enough that a fall from the top would reach terminal velocity before impact.

  4. 4

    The Warsaw radio mast collapse in 1991 highlights how failures in tension systems like guy-wires can bring down extremely tall structures.

  5. 5

    The Burj Khalifa’s height is sufficient to change sunset timing by minutes, leading to Ramadan rules for when people on higher floors can start eating.

  6. 6

    A space elevator is theoretically stable at geostationary altitude due to a balance between gravity and centrifugal effects, but it depends on materials strong enough to span more than 35,000 km.

  7. 7

    A space elevator is framed as a major cost reducer for launching mass into orbit, potentially dropping per-pound costs from about $11,000 to about $100.

Highlights

The Empire State Building is tall enough that a jump from the top would reach terminal velocity before the person hits the ground.
Dubai’s Ramadan rules for the Burj Khalifa account for a measurable sunset delay between the base and floors above 80.
The Warsaw radio mast fell in 1991 after a mistake during guy-wire replacement—an example of how height amplifies risk.
A space elevator would rely on tension stability at geostationary altitude, but no known material is strong enough for a feasible tether.
At the Burj Khalifa, sunset timing differs enough that religious scheduling had to be adjusted by a few minutes.

Topics

  • Tallest Structures
  • Skyscraper Records
  • Radio Masts
  • Burj Khalifa
  • Space Elevator

Mentioned