How I Study 4 subjects at ONCE? (logseq, remnote, obsidian workflow)
Based on Priscilla Xu's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Build notes around reusable concepts so knowledge stays “in context” and can transfer to new problems.
Briefing
Studying multiple subjects at once becomes workable when notes are built around reusable “concepts” rather than isolated facts. The core problem is familiar: after long lectures, notes pile up but feel out of context—so recall turns into “information holding” instead of knowledge that can be applied to new problems. The solution centers on a structured cognitive workflow that keeps basic science concepts accessible and connected, so they can be reused across courses like anatomy, microbiology, and pharmacology.
The method starts with a learning rhythm: brief theory followed by frequent application. A “1 to 5” cadence—about one minute of theory and five minutes of practice—aims to prevent passive note-taking from becoming procrastination or self-doubt. From there, the workflow shifts how students think while taking notes, using three modes of concept thinking. First is linear thinking (“if A then B”), matching how many lectures are organized in step-by-step hierarchies. Second is second-order thinking, which asks indirect effects and cause-and-effect chains (“if A happens, what else changes?”). Third is network thinking, where one concept is treated as a node that links to many related ideas—like viewing a car as a whole system rather than separate parts.
To manage this mental process, the notes are designed around metacognition: planning, executing, and evaluating. If execution feels wrong, the student can stop early rather than cram through confusion. The approach also alternates between “trees and forest”—zooming into details for texture, then zooming out to see how the pieces connect. The practical payoff is a note-taking system that supports retrieval and transfer: after learning, the student asks targeted questions such as when to use classical versus operant conditioning and how to stay mindful rather than overspend on irrelevant materials.
The transcript then lays out four principles for turning concepts into a study system. The first is a mindset that knowledge is not isolated; connections should form “subconsciously.” The second is selective note capture using an “M/E” filter: omit minor or easily understood details to reduce cognitive load and embrace “desirable difficulty,” since effortful learning improves retention. The third principle is to break subject dividers by building networks that let the same concept operate in different contexts. The example centers on “attitudes” in social psychology—defined through thoughts, behaviors, and emotions—and then shows how that concept maps into business management and advertising. Classical conditioning and operant conditioning become the directional links that explain how environments shape behavior and how brands can influence viewer emotions and purchasing attitudes.
Finally, review is treated as a structured mapping task. The student uses a mind map to leverage pattern recognition and metacognition, and in RemNote relies on features like tags, portals, bi-directional links, and universal descriptors. An acronym—GREEN—guides mapping: Group concepts, Reflection, Intentional and interlinked notes, and Directional relationships (cause-and-effect, correlation, similarity). The result is a workflow meant to let one concept travel across four subjects at once, turning “boring” material into something personally relevant and easier to apply.
Cornell Notes
The workflow aims to study four subjects at once by building notes around reusable concepts instead of disconnected facts. It pairs a learning cadence (about 1 minute of theory with 5 minutes of application) with three concept-thinking modes: linear (if A then B), second-order (indirect cause-and-effect), and network thinking (link one idea to many). Metacognition—planning, executing, and evaluating—keeps the process from turning into cramming by allowing early correction. Notes are organized with four principles: connect knowledge across domains, filter out minor/easy details (M/E) to reduce cognitive load, break subject “silos” by mapping concepts, and review through mind maps and RemNote graph-style connections using tags and bi-directional links. The example uses “attitudes” and conditioning (classical and operant) to connect social psychology, management, and advertising.
Why does the transcript treat “concepts” as more important than raw lecture notes?
How do the three thinking modes change what gets written down?
What is the role of metacognition in preventing cramming?
How does the M/E filter reduce cognitive load while improving learning?
How does the example of “attitudes” demonstrate breaking subject dividers?
What does the GREEN acronym do during review and mapping?
Review Questions
- When would linear thinking be insufficient, and what specific question should second-order thinking add to the workflow?
- How does the M/E filter change what you write during lectures, and what learning benefit is claimed for that selectivity?
- Using the transcript’s example, how would you map “classical conditioning” versus “operant conditioning” into a new subject area beyond social psychology?
Key Points
- 1
Build notes around reusable concepts so knowledge stays “in context” and can transfer to new problems.
- 2
Use a short theory-to-practice cadence (about 1 minute theory, 5 minutes application) to keep learning active.
- 3
Apply three concept-thinking modes: linear (if A then B), second-order (indirect cause-and-effect), and network thinking (link one idea to many).
- 4
Practice metacognition—plan, execute, evaluate—to catch confusion early instead of cramming through it.
- 5
Reduce cognitive load by filtering lecture details with M/E (omit minor or easily understood items) and embrace desirable difficulty.
- 6
Break subject silos by mapping concepts across courses using directional relationships (cause-and-effect, correlation, similarity).
- 7
Review with structured mind maps and connection tools (tags, portals, bi-directional links, graph view) to strengthen retrieval and understanding.