Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
How I study the Bible thumbnail

How I study the Bible

6 min read

Based on Bible Notetaking with Katie 's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Use wide margins, tabs, sticky notes, and inserted pages so key themes can be marked without needing perfect handwriting or full understanding immediately.

Briefing

A structured, color-coded note system—paired with cross-translation reading and symbol tracking—turns Bible study from a vague exercise into a searchable map of themes, promises, and repeated imagery. The core idea is simple: when a reader doesn’t fully understand a passage, they don’t have to stall. Instead, they mark it as a “placeholder” (tabs, sticky notes, or symbols) so the meaning can be revisited later as other parts of Scripture start to connect.

The method starts with a margin-friendly Bible and a willingness to keep notes messy at first. Using a KJV Journal award Bible large Prince Thomas Nelson, the reader relies on wide margins to insert custom pages and visuals—like a page created for Daniel 7’s “Beast” material, supported by pictures and targeted notes. The approach is practical: information can live on inserted pages, while the Bible text stays readable. When a phrase sparks confusion—such as “adore the Temple of the Lord between the porch and the Altar” in Ezekiel—the reader adds the related cross-reference (including Joel 2:17) directly where it matters, even if the deeper meaning isn’t fully understood yet.

A second layer focuses on “linking” key doctrines across the Bible. When a verse feels important, the reader uses prominent sticky notes to create quick retrieval points. A major example is Isaiah 42:21 (“the Lord is well pleased… he will magnify the law and make it honorable”), which becomes a tool for responding to claims that Jesus “did away with the Sabbath.” The study logic is that Jesus’ Sabbath actions are framed as honoring and magnifying God’s law rather than abolishing it—so the verse is kept ready for later discussion.

To build understanding without getting overwhelmed, the reader uses two reading plans. One is an audio-style overview running in the background (for familiarity and pattern recognition). The other is a deep-dive routine: listening to the New King James Version while reading the King James Version, then writing differences on top. If meaning still isn’t clear, the reader consults additional translations via BibleHub.com and then drills down further using Strong’s numbers to define specific words (for instance, “adamant” in Ezekiel 3:9, traced to a term associated with hardness and “a thorn… from its keenness for scratching a gem”). That word study then feeds into a larger theme: the “Seal of God” and the “mark of the beast,” with the reader interpreting “forehead” and “hands” as connected to thoughts and actions.

Color-coding and symbols make the system scalable. The reader circles and colors verses by category (e.g., Seal of God, Antichrist, Satan, mark of the beast) and plans a more organized rainbow layout for future note-taking. Symbols like “S” for Satan and “A” for Antichrist help locate verses quickly, while tabs and lettered notes track which passages belong to which theme.

Finally, the study method emphasizes repeated biblical symbolism—especially connections between Old Testament sanctuary imagery and New Testament fulfillment. A detailed example is Revelation’s use of sanctuary elements: “seven golden candlesticks,” “table of showbread,” and “altar of incense” are treated as structured, time-spanning imagery rooted in Exodus and Leviticus. The takeaway is that Scripture’s patterns aren’t random; they’re meant to be noticed, linked, and revisited—so even difficult books like Job or symbol-heavy sections like Revelation become manageable through targeted study aids and cross-references.

Cornell Notes

The study approach centers on building a Bible “map” using tabs, sticky notes, inserted pages, and especially color-coding. When a passage is unclear, it’s marked as a placeholder rather than left behind, so later reading can supply context. The reader deepens understanding by comparing the King James Version with the New King James Version, then checking other translations and using BibleHub.com and Strong’s numbers for word-level clarity (e.g., Ezekiel 3:9 “adamant”). Themes and symbols—like the “Seal of God” and sanctuary imagery—are tracked across books so repeated motifs (Old Testament to New Testament, and into Revelation) become easier to find and explain.

How does the reader handle passages that are confusing or not fully understood yet?

Confusion doesn’t stop the process. The reader uses tabs on the side of the Bible for items needing clarification and adds sticky notes when a verse feels important but can’t be fully worked out immediately. For example, Ezekiel’s “adore the Temple of the Lord between the porch and the Altar” triggers a cross-reference to Joel 2:17, and pictures are inserted in relevant spots even though the deeper meaning is still developing. The goal is to create a retrieval trail so later study can connect the dots.

What role do cross-translation comparisons play in the study routine?

Deep study combines listening and reading: the reader listens to the New King James Version while reading the King James Version, then writes differences directly on top of the KJV text when wording diverges. If the meaning still isn’t clear, the reader consults other translations on BibleHub.com (including the Berean translation) and then uses Strong’s numbers to define specific words. This word-level work is used to support broader theme conclusions, such as interpreting Ezekiel 3:9’s “adamant” through its Strong’s definition.

How does the “Seal of God” theme get tracked and connected to specific Bible details?

The reader treats the “Seal of God” as a tracked subject with dedicated visual markers. Verses related to hardness imagery—like Ezekiel 3:9 (“forehead… harder than flint”)—are circled and color-filled under a category (blue in the older system). The reader also plans a more organized rainbow system where each doctrine category has its own color and spacing, and uses symbols (like “S” and “A”) plus lettered notes to quickly locate verses. The underlying interpretive link is that the “mark” and “seal” involve both forehead and hands, tying outward actions to inward thoughts.

Why does the reader emphasize repeated biblical symbols rather than treating each passage as isolated?

Repeated symbols are treated as evidence of intentional connections across Scripture. A central example is the “cup” motif: Jesus’ “cup” language in the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) is connected to John’s “cup” moment at the betrayal (John 18:11), where Jesus accepts the cup the Father gives. The reader then extends the symbolism to Jeremiah 25’s wine-cup imagery and to Revelation 14:10’s “wine of the wrath of God” poured into a cup. The method claims that noticing these recurring symbols deepens meaning beyond a surface reading.

How does sanctuary imagery function as a framework for understanding Revelation?

Sanctuary elements are used as a structural key. Revelation’s references to “seven golden candlesticks,” “table of showbread,” and “altar of incense” are mapped to the sanctuary layout described in Exodus and Leviticus. The reader points to Revelation 1–3 for the candlesticks, Revelation 4–7 for the table of showbread, and Revelation 8–11 for the altar of incense, arguing these are simultaneous ministries tied to the same periods of time. The result is a less overwhelming Revelation because the imagery is treated as organized, not random.

What practical steps reduce overwhelm when starting this kind of study system?

The reader advises patience and not rushing. Understanding grows as familiarity increases and symbols become recognizable. Practically, the reader separates study into two plans: an audio overview for background familiarity (like listening while doing dishes) and a deep-dive routine for close comparison and note-taking. The system also starts simple—tabs and sticky notes—then evolves into more organized color categories as the reader refines the setup.

Review Questions

  1. What specific tools does the reader use when a verse is important but not yet understood, and how do those tools help later retrieval?
  2. How does comparing KJV and NKJV (plus other translations and Strong’s numbers) change the way the reader interprets difficult wording?
  3. Give one example of a repeated symbol (such as the cup or sanctuary imagery) and explain how the reader connects it across multiple Bible books.

Key Points

  1. 1

    Use wide margins, tabs, sticky notes, and inserted pages so key themes can be marked without needing perfect handwriting or full understanding immediately.

  2. 2

    Treat unclear passages as placeholders; mark them for later so new reading can supply context rather than forcing instant comprehension.

  3. 3

    Run two reading tracks: an audio overview for familiarity and a close-dive routine that compares KJV and NKJV line-by-line.

  4. 4

    When wording is unclear, consult additional translations and use BibleHub.com with Strong’s numbers to define key terms at the word level.

  5. 5

    Build doctrine and theme retrieval systems with color-coding, circles, and category symbols (e.g., separate colors for Seal of God, mark of the beast, Antichrist, Satan).

  6. 6

    Track repeated biblical symbols across testaments—like the “cup” motif or sanctuary elements—to see structured connections rather than isolated stories.

  7. 7

    For symbol-heavy books like Revelation, use sanctuary-based frameworks (candlesticks, showbread, incense) anchored in Exodus and Leviticus to reduce overwhelm.

Highlights

The study system treats confusion as part of the process: tabs and sticky notes preserve questions until later reading connects them.
Deep understanding comes from comparing KJV and NKJV, then using BibleHub.com and Strong’s numbers to define key words like “adamant” in Ezekiel 3:9.
Color-coding and symbols turn doctrine into a searchable index—so verses about the Seal of God or the mark of the beast can be found quickly.
The “cup” symbolism is traced from Jesus’ words in the Gospels to John’s acceptance moment, then back to Jeremiah and forward to Revelation 14:10.
Revelation becomes more manageable when sanctuary imagery is treated as an organized framework rooted in Exodus and Leviticus.

Topics

  • Bible Note-Taking
  • Color Coding
  • Cross-References
  • Word Studies
  • Sanctuary Symbolism

Mentioned

  • Katie
  • KJV
  • NKJV
  • KJV Journal award Bible