How I Take Literature/Book Notes using Obsidian MD (Beginner Workflow/Guide)
Based on John Mavrick Ch.'s video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Organize literature notes using the book’s own sections and chapters as headers to speed up retrieval.
Briefing
A practical Obsidian workflow turns reading into repeatable action by separating “reference” notes (what to remember) from “application” notes (what to do). The core idea is simple: capture key passages and structure them for quick retrieval, then convert those takeaways into a short, personalized plan while the concepts are still fresh—so inspiration doesn’t evaporate after a few days.
The process starts with note design that matches how the reader thinks. For literature notes, headers mirror the book’s sections and chapters, making it easier to navigate and revisit specific ideas later. Each note can include metadata such as the author, tags, and a link back to the source, but the real emphasis is on building a structure that fits the book’s organization. For example, notes for The Plateau Effect by Bob Sullivan and Herbert Thompson use the book’s chapter layout as the skeleton, with key quotes and supporting material slotted under the relevant headers.
Next comes an “application note” template built for reflection and action. The template centers on three sentences that summarize the book’s most important takeaways. Those sentences aren’t just restatements; they’re prompts for the reader’s mindset and next steps—such as considering the author’s purpose, extracting lessons from the author’s experiences, and identifying what new notes or concepts should be created or expanded inside the Obsidian vault. The workflow also encourages recording personal connections and turning them into future plans, explicitly addressing the common failure mode: spending time reading without converting insights into day-to-day practices.
During and after reading, the workflow stays lightweight and permissive. The reader writes down refreshing ideas immediately, copies quotes and images that resonate, and doesn’t overthink whether something “counts” as a note—if it seems relevant, it gets added to the right place. The application note remains open during reading so the three-sentence summary and action-oriented reflections can be updated as new insights appear. After the reading session, the reader quickly scans what was just captured, then fills the application note categories while the memory is still vivid.
When it’s time to convert ideas into a “second brain,” the workflow uses existing notes as scaffolding rather than starting from scratch. New connections are built by linking takeaways into broader areas like wellness, productivity, or a specific stagnancy/plateau-effect note. Reference notes serve as the retrieval layer for concepts before permanent notes are created.
To make this repeatable, the workflow recommends templates and hotkeys inside Obsidian: a template note can include the title, date/time, and tags, plus one-word headers such as principles, benefits, downfalls, and cultivation. Permanent notes then feed into daily routines. A daily note acts like a mirror with “sticky notes,” pulling in reminders to read and apply personal laws or topic-based practices. Even for lighter sources like blogs or Reddit posts, the workflow suggests routing ideas directly into the appropriate notes—or, when motivation is low, pasting them into the daily note for end-of-day sorting. Overall, switching from Google Docs to Obsidian is framed as enabling deeper personalization through structure, linking, and templates, turning reading into a system for ongoing action.
Cornell Notes
The workflow separates literature capture from life application inside Obsidian. Book notes are organized to match the book’s structure (sections and chapters as headers) and include metadata like author, tags, and source links. An application note template then forces conversion into action using a three-sentence summary plus personal connections, reflections, and future plans. During reading, quotes, images, and new ideas are added immediately, with the application note kept open so takeaways can be written while they’re fresh. Finally, ideas are linked into existing “permanent” notes using reference notes as a retrieval layer, supported by templates and hotkeys to keep the system fast and consistent.
How does the workflow make book notes easy to revisit later?
What is the purpose of the “application note,” and what does it contain?
What does “write first, decide later” look like in practice?
How does the workflow reduce the burden of creating new notes from scratch?
Why are templates and hotkeys emphasized?
How does the system connect reading notes to daily behavior?
Review Questions
- What specific structural choices (headers, metadata, linking) make the literature notes easier to navigate later?
- How does the three-sentence application note template help convert reading into concrete actions?
- Describe the workflow’s method for turning new insights into permanent notes without starting from scratch.
Key Points
- 1
Organize literature notes using the book’s own sections and chapters as headers to speed up retrieval.
- 2
Use an application note template with a three-sentence summary to force reflection and action, not just recall.
- 3
Keep the application note open during reading so takeaways can be captured while they’re fresh.
- 4
Build new permanent notes by linking insights into existing reference and topic notes (e.g., wellness, productivity, plateau/stagnancy) rather than starting from blank pages.
- 5
Standardize note creation with Obsidian templates and hotkeys, including title/date/time and tags.
- 6
Use daily notes as a reminder system that pulls in personal practices so reading leads to behavior change.
- 7
Route lighter sources (blogs/Reddit) into existing notes immediately, or paste into the daily note for end-of-day sorting when energy is low.