Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
How I Take SMART Notes in Obsidian MD thumbnail

How I Take SMART Notes in Obsidian MD

John Mavrick Ch.·
5 min read

Based on John Mavrick Ch.'s video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Capture ideas fast as fleeting notes using Quick Switcher and a consistent shortcut workflow, then route them by informational vs personal vs actionable intent.

Briefing

A practical Obsidian workflow centers on capturing ideas fast, tagging them by maturity, and turning them into a web of connected “permanent” knowledge—so retrieval becomes effortless and writing gets easier. The system starts with four note types—fleeting, literature, permanent, and project notes—and then routes each new thought into the right place using templates, quick capture, and a lightweight status model.

Fleeting notes act as temporary placeholders for both informational and actionable ideas. For quick capture, the workflow uses Obsidian’s quick switcher and a Shift+Enter shortcut to create a note on the spot. Personal fleeting ideas get an “=” prefix in the title to trigger a template with prompts designed to spark reflection and elaboration, while more objective ideas keep a normal title and pull in a default template. To track how far an idea has developed, the notes use the “evergreen” status scheme popularized by Andy Matuschak: seedling (bare bones), herb (expandable), sun (developed but not well connected), and evergreen (finished). In practice, the creator admits the system isn’t always maintained strictly—many notes end up with no status—yet the framework still guides how ideas are treated.

Informational fleeting notes are built from a simple template, then extended as needed. Automation relies on Templater and a “meta template” referenced from Brian Jenks’s workflow, though the approach can be replicated manually using plugins like Templater or Quick Add. The workflow emphasizes choosing tags for general topics and links for hierarchical relationships, treating tags like broad topical labels and links like a navigable structure.

Actionable notes lean on lists and task tracking. For reminders, a Reminders plugin is used: tasks are created with reminder text and a date using a specific syntax, then surfaced in a sidebar pane with notifications on Obsidian startup. For day-to-day execution, to-do lists handle ongoing tasks. Literature notes track progress on inputs like books, articles, and podcasts, with different templates so prompts and fields match the consumption style. Common fields include start and finish dates plus copied links; title prefixes also help search and automate template insertion.

Project notes hold planning and resources, organizing tasks around specific projects. The workflow keeps most notes as permanent by default—deleting mainly when task notes clutter the system or when a seedling idea isn’t worth expanding. Instead of discarding completed literature or projects, the approach favors archiving them for reference.

Structure ties everything together through inboxes and dashboards. Separate inboxes capture seedling notes, inputs to consume, and tasks. A “workbench” note uses Dataview queries to surface seedling/herb/sun items needing development, and can link the current note as a reminder. Inputs are saved via Pocket (with plans to switch to Raindrop.io for folder organization). Literature tracking uses Dataview Kanban boards with stages like not finished reading, implementing, and finished book notes, while Kindle highlights can be imported via a Kindle Highlights plugin. For tasks and habits, Habitica is mentioned, with an alternative path via Obsidian task plugins.

The payoff is retrieval and connection: Quick Switcher plus consistent naming makes information easy to recall, and the system’s flexibility allows both folder-like organization and cross-linking across higher-level ideas. The result is a vault designed to support writing, research, and ongoing productivity without heavy mental retrieval work from memory.

Cornell Notes

The workflow organizes Obsidian into four note types—fleeting, literature, permanent, and project notes—so new ideas can be captured quickly, matured over time, and later retrieved with minimal effort. Fleeting notes use an evergreen-style status model (seedling, herb, sun, evergreen) to indicate how developed an idea is, while templates and automation (Templater, Quick Add) standardize capture. Literature notes use different templates for different input types (books vs articles/podcasts) and track start/finish dates plus links. Project notes centralize planning and resources, and most content is kept as permanent notes, with deletion reserved for clutter or ideas that won’t be expanded. Dashboards like a workbench inbox and Dataview Kanban views help surface what needs attention next.

How does the system decide what to do with a new idea the moment it’s captured?

New thoughts become “fleeting notes,” created quickly via Quick Switcher and a Shift+Enter shortcut. The workflow splits fleeting notes into informational vs actionable: informational ideas get a normal title that pulls a default template, while personal ideas use an “=” title prefix to trigger a template with reflection prompts. Actionable items lean toward task-style tracking using lists and reminders rather than purely descriptive notes.

What does “evergreen” status mean in this vault, and how is it used?

The notes use Andy Matuschak’s evergreen note maturity model with a Status field: seedling for bare-bones ideas, herb for ideas that still need expansion, sun for ideas that are developed but lack connections, and evergreen for finished ideas. In practice, status isn’t always maintained—many notes end up with no status—but the categories still guide how ideas are treated and later surfaced for development.

How are informational notes and literature notes kept distinct?

Informational fleeting notes are built from a simple template and then extended depending on the situation. Literature notes are more structured and vary by input type—books are handled differently than short articles or podcasts—so prompts and fields match how each input should be processed. Literature notes typically include when reading started and finished, plus relevant links (often copied from the source), and title prefixes that support search and template automation.

What tools and plugins support the “inbox → review → action” loop?

Separate inboxes capture seedling notes, inputs to consume, and tasks. A workbench note uses Dataview queries to find seedling/herb/sun notes needing future development, and can link the current note as a reminder. For reminders, a Reminders plugin lets users create tasks with reminder text and a date using a syntax, then view them in a sidebar pane with notifications when Obsidian opens. For inputs, Pocket is used now, with a planned switch to Raindrop.io for folder organization.

How does the vault make retrieval easier than relying on memory?

The system leans on Quick Switcher and consistent naming so ideas are reachable by search rather than mental recall. It also encourages connecting notes through links (hierarchical relations) and using tags for general topics, creating a network where writing topics can be assembled from existing connections. Flexibility is key: notes can live in folder-like structures while still being linked to multiple higher-level ideas.

Review Questions

  1. What criteria determine whether a captured idea becomes an informational fleeting note, a personal reflection note, or an actionable task/reminder?
  2. How does the seedling/herb/sun/evergreen status model influence what shows up in the workbench and what gets developed next?
  3. Why does the workflow prefer archiving completed literature and project notes as permanent notes instead of deleting them?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Capture ideas fast as fleeting notes using Quick Switcher and a consistent shortcut workflow, then route them by informational vs personal vs actionable intent.

  2. 2

    Use an evergreen-style maturity status (seedling, herb, sun, evergreen) to signal how developed an idea is and to drive future review.

  3. 3

    Standardize note creation with templates and automation (Templater/Quick Add), but keep the system usable even without heavy programming.

  4. 4

    Separate literature notes by input type (books vs articles/podcasts) so prompts and fields match how the material is consumed.

  5. 5

    Track actionable work with reminders and task lists, using a Reminders plugin for sidebar visibility and startup notifications.

  6. 6

    Keep most knowledge as permanent notes and archive completed items for reference, deleting mainly to reduce clutter or when an idea won’t be expanded.

  7. 7

    Build “inbox” and dashboard views (workbench + Dataview Kanban) so the vault surfaces what needs attention next.

Highlights

Fleeting notes are created in seconds, with an “=” title prefix triggering reflection prompts for personal ideas while objective ideas use a default template.
The evergreen maturity model (seedling → herb → sun → evergreen) is stored in a Status field and used to surface ideas needing development.
Dataview Kanban boards track reading and implementation stages for literature notes, turning progress into a navigable workflow.
A Reminders plugin turns tasks into sidebar-visible, startup-notifying reminders using a date syntax.
The system’s main advantage is retrieval: Quick Switcher plus consistent naming and linking reduces the need to remember where ideas live.

Topics