Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
How to build lasting routines with ADHD thumbnail

How to build lasting routines with ADHD

5 min read

Based on Ali Alqaraghuli, PhD's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Start with clarity by defining the routine’s real incentive—social, health, or practical reasons that make daily repetition worthwhile.

Briefing

Lasting routines for ADHD don’t come from willpower or rigid “discipline.” They come from building the right routine for the right incentive—and then engineering an environment and system that makes the routine easy to start, hard to derail, and fast to recover when it slips.

The foundation starts with clarity: people often skip the most basic question—why the routine matters. Wanting a routine because it looks impressive on social media (like waking up to do 100 push-ups) usually fails because there’s no internal reason to sustain it. The teeth-brushing example is used to show what real incentives look like: better breath, healthier teeth, and smoother social interaction. If the “why” isn’t strong, the routine never gets the mental fuel to survive normal distractions.

Next comes intention, framed as a concrete commitment to start at a specific time, in a specific place, and in a specific setting. Vague goals (“I should do this”) don’t reliably trigger action, especially for people who struggle with starting. Implementation intention—telling oneself exactly when and where to begin—reduces friction at the moment the routine needs to start.

The third step is subtraction, the move most people miss. Even when clarity and intention are present, routines collapse if something more dopamine-rich is within reach. A personal example centers on evening planning: the plan was to sit down at 10 p.m., but the phone pulled attention away until midnight. The fix wasn’t changing the routine—it was removing the competing stimulus by deleting social media apps, reorganizing the phone, and blocking distractions so the routine had the attention bandwidth it needed.

After subtraction, the routine must be turned into a system with four parts. First, optimize the environment so the next action is obvious—like toothbrush and toothpaste placed where they can’t be missed. This matters more for ADHD because clutter and weak cues increase distractibility. The retainer example shows “habit stacking”: placing the retainer next to the toothbrush so the nightly action automatically cues the next step.

Second, remove dependencies so the routine doesn’t break when circumstances change. A routine that requires a specific toothbrush or a habit tracker pinned to a bedroom wall becomes fragile. Moving tracking to a phone and keeping cues portable makes the routine resilient across locations.

Third, build a rebound plan. Most people respond to a missed day with negative self-talk (“I can’t stick to routines”), which creates a loop of self-doubt and emotional avoidance. Instead, the approach is diagnostic and curious: ask why the routine cracked—was the environment wrong, was a dependency missing, was something distracting, and is the routine still worth doing? This shifts the mindset from criticism to problem-solving and supports iteration.

Finally, tracking is emphasized as essential for improvement, though it’s treated as a topic for a later video. The overall message is iterative engineering: routines will have cracks, but a well-designed system helps them hold up—and bounce back quickly—so they become robust over time.

Cornell Notes

The core claim is that lasting routines for ADHD are built through engineering, not willpower: strong incentives plus a system that makes the routine easy to start, hard to derail, and fast to repair after setbacks. The process begins with clarity (why the routine matters) and intention (when and where to start). Subtraction removes competing distractions—like reorganizing and blocking phone apps that steal attention during evening planning. The system then relies on environment cues, removing dependencies so routines work across locations, and a rebound plan that replaces self-criticism with a diagnostic, curious mindset. Tracking supports iteration, though it’s deferred for deeper coverage later.

Why does “clarity” come before motivation or discipline in building routines?

Clarity means getting specific about the routine’s purpose—why it’s worth doing every day. The transcript contrasts routines inspired by social media (e.g., a morning routine of 100 push-ups) with routines that have real incentives. Teeth brushing is used as the model: people brush because it supports healthy teeth, fresh breath, and social comfort. Without an internal “why,” the routine lacks the incentive needed to survive distractions and low-energy days.

What does “intention” mean here, and how does it help with starting?

Intention is treated as a concrete commitment to begin at a defined time and in a defined place and setting. Instead of “I should do this,” the goal is “I will start doing this at this time in this place.” The transcript links this to implementation intention: specifying the start conditions reduces the mental load of deciding when to begin, which is especially helpful when starting is a common struggle.

What is “subtraction,” and why is it described as the step most people miss?

Subtraction removes the stronger competing behavior that steals attention. The example is evening planning: the person intended to plan at 10 p.m., but kept getting pulled in by phone apps until late at night. The fix was to delete social media apps, reorganize the phone, and block distractions so the routine could actually happen when 10 p.m. arrived. The key idea: clarity and intention don’t work if a higher-dopamine alternative is still available.

How do environment optimization and “habit stacking” make routines more reliable?

Environment optimization makes the next step visually and physically obvious. Teeth brushing works because the toothbrush and toothpaste are already in view in the bathroom—no extra steps required. For ADHD, clutter or weak cues reduce follow-through. Habit stacking is used with a retainer: after the routine-building steps, the retainer and retainer cleaner are placed next to the toothbrush and toothpaste so brushing automatically cues retainer use.

What does it mean to remove dependencies, and why does it prevent routines from becoming fragile?

Dependencies are conditions that must be present for the routine to happen. The transcript warns against routines that require specific items or specific locations—like needing one exact toothbrush or relying on a habit tracker pinned to a wall in a particular room. When the person moved tracking to a phone (portable everywhere), the routine became less location-dependent and more durable.

How should someone respond when a routine breaks—what’s the rebound plan?

Instead of negative self-talk (“I can’t stick to routines”), the rebound plan uses a curious, diagnostic mindset. The person asks why the routine failed: Was the cue not obvious enough? Was a dependency missing? Was something distracting? Is the routine still worth doing? This reframes setbacks as solvable problems and supports iteration, which matters for perfectionist tendencies.

Review Questions

  1. Which part of the routine-building process is meant to strengthen the incentive, and what example is used to illustrate it?
  2. How does subtraction differ from simply “trying harder” to follow a routine?
  3. What are two ways the system reduces fragility when routines are attempted in different environments?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Start with clarity by defining the routine’s real incentive—social, health, or practical reasons that make daily repetition worthwhile.

  2. 2

    Use intention by specifying the exact time and place to begin, turning vague goals into concrete start conditions.

  3. 3

    Apply subtraction by removing or blocking competing distractions that deliver more immediate dopamine than the routine.

  4. 4

    Optimize the environment so the routine cue is obvious and in front of you, especially in clutter-prone settings.

  5. 5

    Remove dependencies so the routine works across locations and doesn’t rely on one specific object or one fixed place.

  6. 6

    Build a rebound plan that replaces self-criticism with a diagnostic checklist to identify what broke and how to fix it.

  7. 7

    Track progress to support iteration and routine robustness over time, with tracking treated as a separate deeper topic.

Highlights

Routines stick when they’re engineered: clarity and intention aren’t enough if a more rewarding distraction is still available.
Subtraction is the turning point—blocking phone apps and removing competing stimuli can make a routine suddenly doable.
Environment cues matter: placing the retainer next to the toothbrush uses habit stacking to turn brushing into an automatic trigger.
Fragility comes from dependencies—portable systems (like phone-based tracking) keep routines alive when circumstances change.
Setbacks should trigger diagnosis, not shame: ask what failed (cues, dependencies, distractions) and adjust the system.

Topics

  • ADHD Routines
  • Implementation Intention
  • Subtraction
  • Habit Stacking
  • Routine Systems
  • Rebound Plans
  • Tracking

Mentioned