How to find journals for publication
Based on Research and Analysis's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Use subject-filtered journal databases to build a shortlist before making any submission decisions.
Briefing
Choosing the right journal is often the biggest hurdle after finishing a research article or extracting a paper from a PhD or Master’s thesis. The practical way forward is to start with journal databases that let researchers filter by subject area, then narrow options based on fit and publishing logistics—especially publication fees and processing time.
A first, database-driven route uses Emerald Insight. By going to emerald.com and browsing “books and journals,” researchers can view thousands of listed titles (over 4,000). The key step is filtering by subject area and then selecting a relevant subcategory. For example, a paper tied to “HR and organizational behavior” can be narrowed further to a subtopic like “global HRM,” which yields a manageable list of journals and books (34 in the example). Researchers can then display all results on one page and identify specific journal titles that match the topic.
The same filtering approach works with Elsevier’s journal catalog. Using the Elsevier site, researchers select “Publish with Elsevier,” then open the “Journal catalog.” From there, keyword search plus subject filters (such as “Social Sciences and Humanities,” then narrower areas like “Business, Management and Accounting,” and further categories like “Administration and marketing”) produces a short list of journals. That list can include practical decision metrics such as ISSN numbers, impact factors, and acceptance rates, helping researchers compare journals beyond just topical relevance.
SAGE’s journal directory offers another structured path. At journals.sage.com, users browse by discipline—starting with “Social Sciences and Humanities”—and then select a specific subject such as “Management and organizational studies.” This can reduce a large discipline set (806 journals) down to a focused subset (122 journals) aligned with the research theme.
For researchers with more experience, Google Scholar becomes a powerful complementary strategy. Instead of starting from a journal list, researchers search for topic-specific keywords (for example, “employee volunteering”), then filter results by recency (such as since 2020). The goal is not to pick the articles themselves, but to identify which journals have published on that keyword recently. If an article on the topic appears in a known journal—such as “Human Resource Management Review” in the example—then that journal becomes a strong candidate for submission.
Regardless of the search method, journal targeting still depends on submission realities. Researchers should account for article quality expectations, publication fees, and processing time, since some journals may be unsuitable if they take too long—particularly when timelines matter. The overall workflow is clear: use databases to shortlist by subject fit, use Google Scholar to validate topical relevance through recent publications, then apply practical constraints to finalize the submission targets.
Cornell Notes
Selecting a journal after completing a thesis-derived paper becomes manageable when researchers use subject-filtered journal databases to build a shortlist. Emerald Insight, Elsevier’s Journal catalog, and SAGE’s journal directory all support narrowing by discipline, subject area, and subcategory, producing lists that match topics like HR and organizational behavior or global HRM. Google Scholar can then validate fit by showing which journals have recently published on the same keywords, using filters such as “since 2020.” Final choices should also factor in submission requirements and practical constraints like publication fees and processing time, since these vary widely across journals.
How can a researcher use Emerald Insight to find journals that match a specific topic?
What workflow helps researchers shortlist journals using Elsevier’s Journal catalog?
How does SAGE’s directory reduce a large journal set to a topic-relevant subset?
Why use Google Scholar for journal targeting, and how should results be filtered?
What additional factors should be considered after finding topic-matching journals?
Review Questions
- When using a database like Emerald Insight, what two levels of filtering (beyond just searching) help narrow to the most relevant journals?
- How does Google Scholar’s keyword-and-recency approach differ from database filtering, and what does it help confirm?
- Which practical constraints—besides subject fit—should influence the final journal selection?
Key Points
- 1
Use subject-filtered journal databases to build a shortlist before making any submission decisions.
- 2
Emerald Insight supports narrowing from broad subject areas to specific subcategories (e.g., HR → global HRM) to surface relevant journals.
- 3
Elsevier’s Journal catalog combines keyword search with filters and can display decision metrics like ISSN, impact factor, and acceptance rate.
- 4
SAGE’s directory lets researchers narrow from a discipline (e.g., Social Sciences and Humanities) to a specific subject area (e.g., Management and organizational studies).
- 5
Google Scholar can validate journal fit by identifying which journals have published on the same keywords recently (e.g., since 2020).
- 6
Final journal choices should account for publication fees and processing time, not just topical alignment.
- 7
Journal targeting works best as a two-step process: shortlist by fit, then apply practical constraints to select the best submission targets.