How to get out of academia safely | Step by Step
Based on Andy Stapleton's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Start planning an exit strategy early—ideally during a PhD—so leaving academia doesn’t become a last-minute, high-stress scramble.
Briefing
Leaving academia shouldn’t be treated as a last-minute crisis. The safest path out is to start planning during a PhD—building a fallback career you genuinely enjoy—so the eventual decision doesn’t feel like being trapped with no options. Academia can look like a “rockstar” dream (professorships are the prize), but the odds are slim, and preparing early turns a taboo, anxiety-heavy leap into something more deliberate.
A practical exit plan starts with three “building stages” that run alongside research work. First comes skills: while holding the security of a PhD or early-career role, people should explore different directions through volunteering, courses, and hands-on practice. The transcript’s example centers on science communication—volunteering to blog for a research institute, producing videos, and writing for outlets—using the PhD period as time to test what feels energizing rather than what looks impressive on a CV. The goal isn’t to build a job-ready package immediately; it’s to find what someone actually likes, whether that’s writing, public speaking, coding, data analysis, or even arts-based work.
Second comes networks. Once someone has spent months trying options, the next move is to connect with people in the target field. In Australia—particularly Adelaide—networking is framed as “who you know,” not just “what you know.” Tactics include reaching out directly, using meetups and Eventbrite-style events, and attending conferences for relevant communities (the example mentions Science Communicators of Australia). Networking also creates a safety net: references, guidance, and advocates who can help translate research experience into a new professional language.
Third comes evidence. Exploration and connections aren’t enough when leaving academia; hiring managers outside academia want proof. The example uses weekly blogging about science (with a comedic, sometimes edgy tone) as a portfolio of work. That output then led to writing opportunities with ScienceAlert, including a meeting with an HR manager and later an internship acceptance at Cosmos magazine. The underlying message: build a separate track record that demonstrates competence in the new domain, so the transition can be explained with concrete artifacts.
When the “jump” arrives, three conditions should be in place to reduce panic. Financial runway is first: savings and support should cover a period—often 6 to 12 months—when income may drop. Financial stress pushes people toward quick, money-driven choices rather than life-by-design decisions. Second is psychological narrative control: the transcript describes telling colleagues a confident story (“I have a plan”) even when uncertainty is real, because maintaining a coherent internal storyline helps people act. Third is external support—friends, partners, or mentors who can validate the timing and keep doubts from derailing the move.
The overall takeaway is control. Instead of waiting to be forced out by grant funding or project endings, people can take charge earlier by building skills, networks, and evidence—then making the transition when the first “green lights” appear, even if the path isn’t perfectly linear.
Cornell Notes
A safer exit from academia comes from planning early—ideally at the start of a PhD—so the eventual move doesn’t feel like a trap. The approach relies on three parallel building stages: develop transferable skills alongside research, form networks in the target field, and create evidence (a portfolio) that proves capability outside academia. Once those foundations exist, the “jump” becomes more manageable with financial runway, supportive buy-in from others, and a confidence-building narrative that keeps uncertainty from stalling action. The key is to design a career path that matches what someone actually enjoys, not just what academia rewards.
Why does the transcript insist that exit planning should start during a PhD rather than after it ends?
What are the three building stages for leaving academia, and how do they work together?
How does the transcript suggest someone find a direction if they don’t know what they want yet?
What does “build evidence” mean in practice, and why is it emphasized?
What three conditions make the final leap feel safer, according to the transcript?
How does networking get framed as useful beyond job leads?
Review Questions
- What specific examples in the transcript illustrate skills, networks, and evidence—and how would you replicate that structure in a different field?
- Which of the three “jump” conditions (financial runway, narrative confidence, external support) would be hardest for you, and what concrete step could you take to strengthen it?
- How does creating evidence outside academia change the way someone can explain their transition to employers?
Key Points
- 1
Start planning an exit strategy early—ideally during a PhD—so leaving academia doesn’t become a last-minute, high-stress scramble.
- 2
Build transferable skills alongside research by exploring multiple options through volunteering, courses, and hands-on practice.
- 3
Turn exploration into action by forming networks in the target field through direct outreach, meetups, and conferences.
- 4
Create evidence in the new domain (a portfolio of work) so the transition can be supported with concrete artifacts, not only academic credentials.
- 5
Prepare for the jump with financial runway to avoid money-driven decisions.
- 6
Maintain a confidence-building narrative and seek external support to prevent uncertainty from derailing the move.
- 7
Treat career change as non-linear: progress comes when early “green lights” appear, not when every condition is perfect.