Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
How to read more books? *even if you don’t like reading* thumbnail

How to read more books? *even if you don’t like reading*

Destina·
5 min read

Based on Destina's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Replace numeric targets with a focus on deep engagement, because quantity-first goals often lead to shallow reading and burnout.

Briefing

Reading goals fail for a simple reason: chasing numbers turns books into a performance, not a practice. The transcript argues that setting targets like “a book a week” or “52 books a year” often leads people to abandon their plans by March because the pace is unrealistic and the method quietly shifts from deep engagement to quick consumption. In one personal example, a college student hit 54 books in a year by reading every day—but later concluded the focus on quantity crowded out the real purpose of reading: becoming wiser through reflection. When numbers become the priority, readers start selecting shorter, easier books, avoid anything challenging, and end up treating reading like a race. The result is forgettable reading—books finished without lasting insight.

The alternative is to build a system around quality, reflection, and personal fit. Instead of treating books like content to “consume,” the transcript emphasizes taking time to engage: reading slowly, checking reviews or the author’s background, and then writing a brief post-read review or mini-essay to capture the lessons worth remembering. A practical rule of thumb is offered: if someone can’t summarize a book’s key ideas in a couple of minutes after finishing it, they likely didn’t engage deeply enough. The goal isn’t to impress others or boost ego with a tally; it’s to let books shape thinking.

Another major driver of disappointment is following the crowd. The transcript cites a Haruki Murakami quote—“If you only read the books that everyone else is reading, you can only think what everyone else is thinking”—as a warning against trend-chasing on platforms like TikTok and YouTube. A personal phase of BookTok recommendations is described as largely unsuccessful, with many books receiving low ratings because they didn’t match individual taste. The fix is to diversify discovery: ask friends and family, explore forums, use AI for suggestions, browse randomly in bookstores or libraries, and even allow unconventional cues like cover appeal. Importantly, readers aren’t obligated to finish every book; abandoning a poor fit is framed as part of keeping reading enjoyable.

Finally, the transcript reframes reading as something that should feel fun and sustainable, not a chore. If reading feels like work, it may signal the routine needs adjustment: switch from Kindle to physical books, break out of repetitive genres, try graphic novels or comics, or use audiobooks when focus is low. Novelty is presented as the key ingredient for consistency—experiment with new genres, pick random library finds, and stay flexible. Reading becomes a slower, quieter form of satisfaction and a dialogue with the author, making it easier to stick with over time.

Cornell Notes

The transcript argues that reading goals collapse when they’re built around numbers instead of meaning. A high-volume target can push readers toward easier, shorter books and shallow engagement, leaving them unable to recall what they read. The recommended approach centers on quality: read slowly, reflect, and write a short review or mini-essay after finishing so the lessons stick. It also warns against trend-driven book selection from platforms like TikTok and BookTok, since recommendations aimed at mass audiences often miss individual taste. Sustainability comes from making reading enjoyable—adding novelty, changing formats (physical books or audiobooks), and abandoning books that don’t fit.

Why do numeric reading goals tend to fail, even for motivated readers?

The transcript describes how focusing on targets like “a book a week” encourages quantity over purpose. That shift can lead readers to pick shorter or simpler books just to stay on track, avoid challenging material, and treat reading like a race. Even when the goal is temporarily met (e.g., reading 54 books in a year), the pace may be unsustainable and the deeper takeaway can be lost—readers may finish books without being able to articulate key lessons afterward.

What does “quality reading” look like in practice?

Quality means engaging deeply rather than consuming quickly. The transcript recommends taking time to reflect, using external context when helpful (reviews, articles, author background), and then producing a short post-read review that captures the most important details and lessons. A diagnostic test is proposed: if someone can’t write a mini-essay or summarize the book’s ideas within a couple of minutes, they likely didn’t engage enough.

How can readers avoid the trap of trend-chasing book recommendations?

The transcript warns that popular platforms recommend to huge, diverse audiences, so the “best” picks for others may not match personal preferences. It cites a Haruki Murakami quote about thinking what everyone else thinks when reading only what everyone else reads. Instead, it suggests diversifying discovery: ask friends and family, explore forums, try AI suggestions, wander through bookstores or libraries, and even consider cover appeal. It also normalizes not finishing books that don’t land.

What should a reader do when reading feels like a chore?

When reading feels like work, the routine likely needs adjustment. The transcript suggests switching formats (Kindle to physical books), breaking out of comfort-zone genres or authors, and trying adjacent formats like graphic novels or comics. If fatigue makes focus difficult, audiobooks are offered as a practical alternative because they allow listening while doing other tasks.

Why does “novelty” matter for consistent reading?

Novelty keeps reading exciting and helps maintain motivation in an overstimulated world. The transcript contrasts books’ slower, quieter satisfaction with the fast dopamine cycles of social media and binge-watching. By experimenting—trying new genres, picking random library books, or choosing unexpected reads—readers reduce boredom and make the habit more sustainable.

Review Questions

  1. What specific behaviors change when someone prioritizes reading numbers over reading purpose?
  2. How does writing a short review after finishing a book function as a tool for deeper engagement?
  3. What discovery strategies can help a reader find books that match personal taste rather than platform trends?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Replace numeric targets with a focus on deep engagement, because quantity-first goals often lead to shallow reading and burnout.

  2. 2

    Read slowly and reflect; use reviews, articles, and author background to enrich understanding rather than rushing through pages.

  3. 3

    After finishing a book, write a short review or mini-essay to capture key lessons—if it’s hard to summarize, engagement likely wasn’t deep enough.

  4. 4

    Avoid relying solely on mass-popularity recommendations from platforms like TikTok and BookTok; seek suggestions that fit personal taste.

  5. 5

    Treat reading as flexible: abandon books that don’t work and keep searching for better matches.

  6. 6

    If reading feels like a chore, adjust the routine—switch formats (physical books or audiobooks), change genres, or try graphic novels and comics.

  7. 7

    Add novelty by experimenting with genres and random picks; variety helps reading stay enjoyable and sustainable.

Highlights

Chasing reading numbers can quietly change what gets picked: shorter, easier books replace longer, more challenging ones, turning reading into a race.
A practical engagement test is offered: if a reader can’t summarize a book’s key ideas soon after finishing, they likely didn’t reflect enough.
Trend-driven book discovery can backfire because recommendations aimed at huge audiences often don’t match individual preferences.
Reading stays sustainable when it feels like an adventure—through novelty, flexibility, and format changes like audiobooks or physical books.

Topics