How to read more books? *even if you don’t like reading*
Based on Destina's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Replace numeric targets with a focus on deep engagement, because quantity-first goals often lead to shallow reading and burnout.
Briefing
Reading goals fail for a simple reason: chasing numbers turns books into a performance, not a practice. The transcript argues that setting targets like “a book a week” or “52 books a year” often leads people to abandon their plans by March because the pace is unrealistic and the method quietly shifts from deep engagement to quick consumption. In one personal example, a college student hit 54 books in a year by reading every day—but later concluded the focus on quantity crowded out the real purpose of reading: becoming wiser through reflection. When numbers become the priority, readers start selecting shorter, easier books, avoid anything challenging, and end up treating reading like a race. The result is forgettable reading—books finished without lasting insight.
The alternative is to build a system around quality, reflection, and personal fit. Instead of treating books like content to “consume,” the transcript emphasizes taking time to engage: reading slowly, checking reviews or the author’s background, and then writing a brief post-read review or mini-essay to capture the lessons worth remembering. A practical rule of thumb is offered: if someone can’t summarize a book’s key ideas in a couple of minutes after finishing it, they likely didn’t engage deeply enough. The goal isn’t to impress others or boost ego with a tally; it’s to let books shape thinking.
Another major driver of disappointment is following the crowd. The transcript cites a Haruki Murakami quote—“If you only read the books that everyone else is reading, you can only think what everyone else is thinking”—as a warning against trend-chasing on platforms like TikTok and YouTube. A personal phase of BookTok recommendations is described as largely unsuccessful, with many books receiving low ratings because they didn’t match individual taste. The fix is to diversify discovery: ask friends and family, explore forums, use AI for suggestions, browse randomly in bookstores or libraries, and even allow unconventional cues like cover appeal. Importantly, readers aren’t obligated to finish every book; abandoning a poor fit is framed as part of keeping reading enjoyable.
Finally, the transcript reframes reading as something that should feel fun and sustainable, not a chore. If reading feels like work, it may signal the routine needs adjustment: switch from Kindle to physical books, break out of repetitive genres, try graphic novels or comics, or use audiobooks when focus is low. Novelty is presented as the key ingredient for consistency—experiment with new genres, pick random library finds, and stay flexible. Reading becomes a slower, quieter form of satisfaction and a dialogue with the author, making it easier to stick with over time.
Cornell Notes
The transcript argues that reading goals collapse when they’re built around numbers instead of meaning. A high-volume target can push readers toward easier, shorter books and shallow engagement, leaving them unable to recall what they read. The recommended approach centers on quality: read slowly, reflect, and write a short review or mini-essay after finishing so the lessons stick. It also warns against trend-driven book selection from platforms like TikTok and BookTok, since recommendations aimed at mass audiences often miss individual taste. Sustainability comes from making reading enjoyable—adding novelty, changing formats (physical books or audiobooks), and abandoning books that don’t fit.
Why do numeric reading goals tend to fail, even for motivated readers?
What does “quality reading” look like in practice?
How can readers avoid the trap of trend-chasing book recommendations?
What should a reader do when reading feels like a chore?
Why does “novelty” matter for consistent reading?
Review Questions
- What specific behaviors change when someone prioritizes reading numbers over reading purpose?
- How does writing a short review after finishing a book function as a tool for deeper engagement?
- What discovery strategies can help a reader find books that match personal taste rather than platform trends?
Key Points
- 1
Replace numeric targets with a focus on deep engagement, because quantity-first goals often lead to shallow reading and burnout.
- 2
Read slowly and reflect; use reviews, articles, and author background to enrich understanding rather than rushing through pages.
- 3
After finishing a book, write a short review or mini-essay to capture key lessons—if it’s hard to summarize, engagement likely wasn’t deep enough.
- 4
Avoid relying solely on mass-popularity recommendations from platforms like TikTok and BookTok; seek suggestions that fit personal taste.
- 5
Treat reading as flexible: abandon books that don’t work and keep searching for better matches.
- 6
If reading feels like a chore, adjust the routine—switch formats (physical books or audiobooks), change genres, or try graphic novels and comics.
- 7
Add novelty by experimenting with genres and random picks; variety helps reading stay enjoyable and sustainable.