Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
How to Write Introduction in Research Paper | Chapter 1 Guide With ChatGPT Prompt thumbnail

How to Write Introduction in Research Paper | Chapter 1 Guide With ChatGPT Prompt

MyWordAi - AI academic research assistants·
4 min read

Based on MyWordAi - AI academic research assistants's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Use the provided AI prompt workflow to generate a Chapter 1.0 “Introduction” section based on structured inputs.

Briefing

A ready-to-use AI prompt workflow is presented for drafting Chapter 1.0 “Introduction” in a research paper, with the key promise that the model can generate a complete introduction once it receives six specific inputs. The approach matters because it targets a common bottleneck in academic writing—turning a rough topic into a properly structured opening section—while keeping the scope narrow: it focuses on the basic introduction only, not background, research questions, objectives, or rationale.

The method starts with an instruction block that tells the AI to collect the necessary details first, then produce the introduction according to defined structural and citation requirements. The prompt is described as part of a larger “fully automated” research-writing system (marketed as applicable even at PhD dissertation level), but the excerpt shown is tailored specifically to Chapter 1.0 “Zero introduction.” The presenter emphasizes that this section is intentionally limited: it is “just the basic first introduction,” explicitly excluding background of studies, research questions, objectives of the study, and rationales.

Next comes the chapter-specific instruction, which is copied into an AI chat interface (named as “chipity” and “DeepSeek” in the transcript). Before writing begins, the prompt instructs the AI to request six pieces of information: (1) research topic, (2) case study (if applicable), (3) target population, (4) data, (5) data collection method, (6) type of study, and (7) referencing style. The transcript then provides an example set of answers. The example topic is “gender differences in life event stress and workers productivity in Oshim South Delta State,” with the case study tied to “Oshimilly South Delta State.” The target population is given as 205,600. For data collection, the example uses a mixed-method approach combining questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, and the study type is described as correlation.

After the user submits these details, the AI is expected to generate the Chapter 1 introduction automatically, with no additional user editing required beyond providing the inputs. The workflow also includes guidance on how to obtain the full prompt package (via download links mentioned in the comments or description) and frames the prompt engineering as “programmatic,” likening it to software development practices.

Finally, the transcript adds two additional claims: prompts are available to “bypass any kind of AI detectors” (including Turnitin), and the system can be used free of charge on platforms like DeepSeek without subscription fees. The overall takeaway is a structured, input-driven prompt that produces a constrained, Chapter 1.0 introduction section—fast—so long as the researcher supplies the specified topic, population, methods, and citation style.

Cornell Notes

The transcript lays out an input-driven AI prompt for writing Chapter 1.0 “Introduction” in a research paper. The prompt first asks for seven details—research topic, case study, target population, data, data collection method, type of study, and referencing style—then generates the introduction using predefined structure and citation rules. A key constraint is scope: it is designed for the basic introduction only, explicitly excluding background of studies, research questions, objectives, and rationale. An example is provided using a study on “gender differences in life event stress and workers productivity” in Oshim South Delta State, with a target population of 205,600 and mixed methods (questionnaires plus semi-structured interviews) using correlation. The practical value is speed and consistency in producing a properly formatted opening section once the inputs are supplied.

What section does the prompt target, and what does it intentionally exclude?

It targets Chapter 1.0 “Introduction” (described as “Zero introduction”). It is explicitly not meant to include background of studies, research questions, objectives of the study, or the rationale of the study—those elements are kept out of scope so the output stays focused on the basic opening introduction.

Which inputs does the prompt require before it can draft the introduction?

The prompt asks for six to seven specific pieces of information: research topic, case study (if applicable), target population, data, data collection method, type of study, and referencing style. These details are meant to let the AI generate an introduction that matches the study design and citation expectations.

How does the example study specify its data collection approach?

The example uses a mixed-method approach combining questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. That method is provided as part of the required “data collection method” input, so the AI can reflect the study’s design in the introduction.

What does the transcript claim happens after the user submits the required details?

After the user supplies the answers to the prompt’s requested fields, the AI is expected to write the Chapter 1 introduction automatically. The transcript frames it as requiring no further work beyond submitting the information, since the model “understands what you want” from the structured inputs.

What referencing and platform-related claims are included?

The prompt includes a “referencing style” requirement as an input, implying the output will follow a chosen citation format. The transcript also mentions using the prompt on DeepSeek without paying platform subscription fees and claims that additional prompts can be used to bypass AI detectors such as Turnitin.

Review Questions

  1. What are the exact elements the prompt is designed to exclude from Chapter 1.0 “Introduction,” and why might that matter for a paper’s structure?
  2. How would you adapt the prompt inputs if your study used an experimental design instead of correlation and relied only on interviews?
  3. Why does providing a referencing style as an input change the usefulness of an AI-generated introduction?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Use the provided AI prompt workflow to generate a Chapter 1.0 “Introduction” section based on structured inputs.

  2. 2

    Keep the scope narrow: the prompt is meant for the basic introduction only, not background, research questions, objectives, or rationale.

  3. 3

    Provide the required details—research topic, case study, target population, data, data collection method, type of study, and referencing style—before requesting output.

  4. 4

    Use the example format to supply a mixed-method design (e.g., questionnaires plus semi-structured interviews) and a study type (e.g., correlation) so the introduction matches the methodology.

  5. 5

    Submit the filled-in answers to trigger automatic drafting of the introduction without additional steps.

  6. 6

    The transcript claims additional prompts exist for bypassing AI detectors (including Turnitin) and suggests free use on DeepSeek.

Highlights

The workflow is built around a constrained deliverable: Chapter 1.0 “Introduction” only, explicitly excluding background, questions, objectives, and rationale.
The AI is prompted to request specific study metadata first—topic, population, methods, and referencing style—then generate the introduction from those inputs.
An example study uses a mixed-method approach (questionnaires + semi-structured interviews) and a correlation design, with a target population of 205,600.
The transcript pairs the writing prompt with claims about detector-evasion prompts and free platform usage on DeepSeek.

Topics

Mentioned