I Hated Academic Writing Until I Discovered These Simple Hacks
Based on Andy Stapleton's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Cut filler words and tighten sentences so each sentence carries meaning with fewer terms.
Briefing
Academic writing gets easier fast when drafts are tightened, rewritten in active voice, kept formal, and scrubbed of repetition—then polished with targeted AI help. The core move is ruthless concision: cut unnecessary words and remove filler phrases that bloat sentences without adding meaning. Examples include replacing “The report provided an explanation for these unusual results” with “The report explained these unusual results,” and trimming longer, clunkier constructions like “There are many different types of bacteria that were found in the sample and each of these types exhibits a unique characteristics” down to “The sample contain various types of bacteria each with unique characteristics.” The payoff is readability: academic prose often feels dense because it packs too many words into each sentence, forcing readers to work harder than necessary.
The second major improvement is switching from passive to active voice. Passive phrasing hides the actor (“was conducted,” “was collected”), while active voice makes the subject do the action (“the archaeologist did a study,” “the researchers collected data”). When writers aren’t sure whether a sentence is passive or active, a practical workaround is to use a large language model to check and correct it. The goal isn’t just grammar—it’s clarity and force, so the reader knows who performed the study and what was done.
Third comes formal language. Instead of informal, conversational wording, academic writing should avoid contradictions, idioms, and colloquial expressions, and should sound precise and professional. The transcript contrasts casual phrasing with more academic alternatives—for instance, swapping “the experiment was a piece of cake” for “the experiment was straightforward and efficient,” and steering away from vague or slangy evaluations like “awesome” or “this sucks.” Neutral or evaluative statements can be reframed using academic verbs such as “generalizes,” “justifies,” “chooses,” “distinguishes,” “assesses,” “classifies,” or “restate,” depending on what the sentence needs to do.
Finally, repetition should be actively managed. Overusing transition words like “also,” “in addition,” “furthermore,” and “moreover” can make writing feel mechanical. The transcript recommends varying transitions and using a “verb cheat sheet” or “useful words” list to swap in comparison and similarity phrasing (e.g., “similarly,” “in a similar way,” “comparing,” “another,” “besides”). A workflow is suggested: start with a brain dump to get ideas on the page, then revise repeatedly to make the language academic—because peer-reviewed papers and theses typically undergo multiple rounds of editing.
AI fits into this process as a targeted editor rather than a replacement for authorship. One suggested prompt takes a paragraph and instructs the model to apply the four core fixes—make it more concise, switch to active voice, avoid repetition, and make it more academic—followed by manual cleanup so the final work reflects the writer’s intent, not just the model’s output.
Cornell Notes
Academic writing improves quickly when drafts are rewritten for concision, active voice, formal tone, and reduced repetition. Tightening sentences removes filler and makes claims easier to read, such as replacing “provided an explanation for” with “explained.” Active voice clarifies who did what, turning passive constructions like “was conducted” into direct statements like “the researchers conducted.” Formal language replaces idioms and casual phrasing with precise academic alternatives, and repetition is controlled by rotating transitions and using word/verb cheat sheets. Large language models can help by checking voice and rewriting paragraphs using these rules, but final edits should ensure the work still reflects the author’s meaning.
What does “be concise” mean in practice for academic writing, and how can a writer spot bloat?
How does switching from passive to active voice improve clarity in research writing?
What counts as “formal language” in academic writing, and what should be avoided?
Why does repetition hurt academic prose, and what are concrete ways to reduce it?
How can a writer use AI without losing authorship or meaning?
What workflow helps someone move from rough ideas to academic language?
Review Questions
- When you find a sentence that uses passive constructions (e.g., “was conducted”), what exact rewrite pattern would you use to convert it to active voice?
- Pick one of the transcript’s examples of concision (like “provided an explanation for” → “explained”). Rewrite a sentence from your own work using the same tightening approach.
- If you repeatedly use “furthermore” or “moreover,” what specific alternative transitions or word choices could you swap in to keep the writing varied?
Key Points
- 1
Cut filler words and tighten sentences so each sentence carries meaning with fewer terms.
- 2
Replace passive voice with active voice by naming the actor (e.g., “the researchers collected data”).
- 3
Use formal academic language by avoiding idioms and casual phrasing, and choosing precise academic verbs.
- 4
Reduce repetition by varying transitions and connectors instead of repeatedly using the same words.
- 5
Use large language models as a rule-based editor (concise, active voice, no repetition, more academic) rather than a final authority.
- 6
Start with a brain dump, then revise through multiple passes to make the writing truly academic.
- 7
Keep the final meaning aligned with the author’s intent through manual review after AI rewrites.