Measure Theory 13 | Lebesgue-Stieltjes Measures [dark version]
Based on The Bright Side of Mathematics's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Lebesgue–Stieltjes measures convert any non-decreasing function F on ℝ into a measure μ_F by weighting interval lengths according to increases in F.
Briefing
Lebesgue–Stieltjes measures turn any non-decreasing function on the real line into an ordinary measure, letting “interval length” be weighted by how that function accumulates. The construction starts with a monotone function F and defines the measure of half-open intervals (a, b] by looking at how much F increases across the interval—carefully accounting for jumps using left and right limits. This matters because it generalizes standard length: when F(x)=x, the resulting measure is exactly Lebesgue measure, while other choices of F produce measures concentrated on points or spread according to a prescribed “accumulation profile.”
The key technical step is handling discontinuities. For a monotone F, jumps can occur, so the measure of (a, b] is not simply F(b)−F(a) when F has a jump at a or b. Since b is excluded, the right endpoint contributes using the left limit at b, written F(b−). Since a is included, the left endpoint contributes using the right limit at a, written F(a+). With this convention, the measure of (a, b] becomes
μ_F((a, b]) = F(b−) − F(a+).
Equivalently, the construction can be phrased using the appropriate one-sided limits: the size of any jump depends only on the left and right limits, not on the value of F at the jump point itself. That observation is crucial: changing F at a single point does not change the resulting measure.
Once μ_F is defined on these half-open intervals, a measure-extension theorem (the Carathéodory extension theorem, referenced via the “semi-ring” property of such intervals) extends the definition uniquely to the full Borel σ-algebra on ℝ. In other words, specifying μ_F on intervals of the form (a, b] pins down exactly one measure on all Borel sets, denoted μ_F. This uniqueness is what makes the approach powerful: define it on a simple generating class, and the rest follows.
Several examples clarify the mechanism. Taking F(x)=x yields μ_F((a, b])=b−a, recovering ordinary Lebesgue measure. Choosing a constant function F(x)=1 produces μ_F((a, b])=0 for all intervals, giving the zero measure. A step function illustrates how jumps create point-mass behavior: if F(x)=0 for x<0 and F(x)=1 for x≥0, then any interval containing 0 in the right way—like (−ε, ε]—has measure 1, matching the Dirac measure at 0. The construction ignores the exact value of F at x=0, since only the one-sided limits determine the jump.
Finally, when F is continuously differentiable and non-decreasing (so F′ is continuous and non-negative), there are no jumps. The measure of (a, b] simplifies to F(b)−F(a), and by the fundamental theorem of calculus this equals ∫_a^b F′(x) dx. In that setting, μ_F can be defined for Borel sets via integration against the “density” F′, showing how Lebesgue–Stieltjes measures connect to weighted Lebesgue measures and density functions.
Cornell Notes
Lebesgue–Stieltjes measures build a measure μ_F from any non-decreasing function F on ℝ. For half-open intervals (a, b], the measure is determined by how F accumulates across the interval using one-sided limits: μ_F((a, b]) = F(b−) − F(a+). Jumps are handled automatically, and the measure does not depend on the value of F at a discontinuity—only the left and right limits matter. Defining μ_F on these intervals is enough: Carathéodory’s extension theorem gives a unique measure on the Borel σ-algebra. When F is C¹ with F′≥0, μ_F((a, b]) becomes ∫_a^b F′(x) dx, so F′ acts like a density.
Why can’t μ_F((a, b]) always be computed as F(b)−F(a) for a monotone F?
What does it mean that the measure “doesn’t care” about the value of F at a jump point?
How does the construction recover ordinary Lebesgue measure?
How does a step function produce a Dirac measure?
When F is smooth, how does μ_F relate to an integral of a density?
Review Questions
- Given a monotone function F with a jump at x0, which one-sided limits determine μ_F((a,b]) when a=x0 or b=x0?
- Compute μ_F((a,b]) for F(x)=x and for F(x)=1, using the interval formula with one-sided limits.
- For F(x)=0 for x<0 and F(x)=1 for x≥0, what is μ_F((−ε,ε]) and why does the exact value at x=0 not matter?
Key Points
- 1
Lebesgue–Stieltjes measures convert any non-decreasing function F on ℝ into a measure μ_F by weighting interval lengths according to increases in F.
- 2
For half-open intervals (a, b], the correct formula is μ_F((a, b]) = F(b−) − F(a+), which uses left and right limits to handle jumps.
- 3
The measure depends only on the one-sided limits of F at discontinuities; changing F at a single point does not change μ_F.
- 4
Defining μ_F on the semi-ring of half-open intervals (a, b] uniquely determines μ_F on all Borel sets via Carathéodory’s extension theorem.
- 5
When F(x)=x, μ_F equals Lebesgue measure because μ_F((a,b])=b−a.
- 6
A step function for F produces point-mass behavior; for example, F(x)=0 (x<0) and 1 (x≥0) yields the Dirac measure at 0.
- 7
If F is C¹ and non-decreasing, then μ_F((a,b])=∫_a^b F′(x) dx, so F′ acts as a density.