Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
On the Wonders and Joy of the Thesaurus (in Obsidian) thumbnail

On the Wonders and Joy of the Thesaurus (in Obsidian)

5 min read

Based on Linking Your Thinking with Nick Milo's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Vocabulary expansion is framed as a defense against mental narrowing, using Orwell’s Newspeak as the cautionary model.

Briefing

Language control can shrink thought, but a richer vocabulary can widen it—and a digital thesaurus built for linked notes turns that idea into a practical workflow. The core claim is that expanding word choice doesn’t just make writing prettier; it improves how people think, analyze, and connect, while also reducing vulnerability to manipulation that relies on emotional, simplified language.

The transcript opens with George Orwell’s “1984” and Newspeak as a warning: removing “bad” and “great” words until only flattened opposites remain (“ungood” and “double plus good”) traps people in a narrower mental range. That framing sets up the video’s counterpoint: instead of treating big words as a threat to identity, people can use them as tools. The thesaurus becomes a way to resist “Big Brother” dynamics—whether literal or political—by making it harder for populists and other bad actors to steer attention using fear, anger, and outrage.

A major portion then focuses on a specific digital resource: a publicly hosted Obsidian Publish version of Peter Mark Roget’s thesaurus (1852), using the “third edition of the 21st century edition” and the concept index by Barbara Ann Kipfer. The creator describes receiving a “gift” from Dennis: a digital copy with a concept index, plus striking scale metrics—about 14,000 distinct notes with definitions, roughly 44,000 words total, and around 420,000 links connecting entries. In Obsidian, hovering over words reveals definitions instantly, and clicking through creates a “rabbit hole” effect where related terms and concepts branch outward.

The transcript demonstrates two navigation modes. First is lateral synonym browsing: starting from a word like “astonish,” the interface surfaces synonyms such as “amaze,” “astound,” “bewilder,” “overwhelm,” and “stupefy.” Second is concept-based browsing using the concept index: “astonish” is linked to “surprise,” which sits under a higher-order meta note (“actions of a cognitive nature”). From there, the user can move up a level to see broader categories and down to adjacent terms—turning word lookup into a structured exploration of meaning.

Beyond synonyms and concepts, the transcript emphasizes categories as a map for serendipity. The categories list includes domains like actions (cognitive, general, motion, physical), causes, fields of human activity (communications, education, entertainment, government, legal, military), professions, recreation, religion, social interactions, the arts, life forms, objects, matter, qualities, senses, and geography. Examples include landscape subcategories like “savannah,” “tundra,” “quagmire,” and “ravine,” framed as ways to describe not just places but felt experiences.

The closing takeaway is both practical and motivational: use the thesaurus for “word excursions” by scrolling the word list or opening the concept index categories note. The promised benefits are improved thinking, richer expression, more nuanced analysis of similarities and differences, greater joy in interactions, and a stronger defense against emotionally manipulative persuasion. The resource is positioned as freely available online via Obsidian Publish, encouraging immediate exploration.

Cornell Notes

The transcript argues that vocabulary expansion is a cognitive upgrade, not a vanity project. It uses Orwell’s Newspeak as a cautionary tale about how shrinking word choice can imprison thought, then counters with a digital thesaurus in Obsidian that links words to definitions and to higher-level concepts. By hovering for definitions and clicking through dense networks of links, users can browse synonyms laterally or move up and down a concept hierarchy (e.g., “astonish” → “surprise” → “actions of a cognitive nature”). The resource’s categories—ranging from human activities to senses and geography—turn lookup into “word excursions,” which the transcript claims can improve thinking, expression, and resilience against manipulative language.

How does the transcript connect vocabulary to freedom of thought?

It starts with Orwell’s “1984,” where Newspeak removes words to limit what people can express. The transcript treats reduced vocabulary as a mental constraint that makes it easier for authoritarian systems (“Big Brother”) to control people. The countermeasure is deliberate word expansion: using a thesaurus to access more precise terms so people can articulate complex emotions and ideas rather than defaulting to simplified, easily weaponized language.

What makes the digital thesaurus in Obsidian different from a traditional book thesaurus?

The digital version is built around linked notes and fast lookup. Hovering over a word reveals its definition immediately, and clicking creates rapid navigation through a dense web of related entries. The transcript highlights scale—about 14,000 notes, 44,000 words, and roughly 420,000 links—so exploration feels like moving through a network rather than flipping pages.

How does “concept index” navigation change the way synonyms are used?

Instead of only collecting synonyms, the concept index ties words to shared meaning categories. For example, “astonish” is a verb meaning “surprise,” and it appears under a meta note called “actions of a cognitive nature.” Clicking “surprise” shows conceptually similar terms (e.g., “backfire,” “bedazzle,” “bewilder,” “confound”), letting users explore meaning relationships beyond a simple synonym list.

What are the two main exploration strategies demonstrated?

One strategy is lateral browsing: start with a word from the word list (like “astonish”), then follow synonyms and related entries. The other is vertical browsing: move up to broader categories via the concept hierarchy (e.g., from “surprise” to higher-order cognitive actions, or from “flashback” to related memory/narrative concepts). The transcript frames this as wandering that can start as a “bunny trail” but deepen into a “rabbit hole.”

Why does the transcript emphasize categories like “matter,” “senses,” or “geography”?

Categories are presented as a structured way to trigger serendipity. Instead of searching for a specific word, users can click into a domain and discover vocabulary that matches a situation’s texture—like landscape terms (“savannah,” “tundra,” “quagmire”) that can describe how a meeting or walk felt. The categories also support analytical thinking by offering alternative ways to classify and compare experiences.

What practical benefits are claimed for using a thesaurus regularly?

The transcript claims vocabulary expansion improves thinking (analytical, creative, and connective), helps people parse details and discern subtle differences, and supports better expression of feelings. It also argues that richer language can reduce susceptibility to emotional manipulation by populists and other bad actors who rely on fear-based, simplified messaging. Finally, it frames word exploration as a source of joy in both self-talk and conversations with others.

Review Questions

  1. When does the transcript recommend using synonyms versus moving through the concept index hierarchy?
  2. What role do categories play in turning thesaurus use into “serendipitous encounters”?
  3. How does the Orwell/Newspeak example function as a motivation for vocabulary expansion in the transcript?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Vocabulary expansion is framed as a defense against mental narrowing, using Orwell’s Newspeak as the cautionary model.

  2. 2

    A digital thesaurus in Obsidian enables fast definition lookup via hover and rapid navigation through linked notes.

  3. 3

    Exploration can be lateral (synonyms) or vertical (concept hierarchy), letting users move from a word to broader meaning categories.

  4. 4

    The concept index links words to higher-order meta notes such as “actions of a cognitive nature,” changing how related terms are discovered.

  5. 5

    Category browsing turns word lookup into structured “word excursions,” spanning domains from human activities to senses and geography.

  6. 6

    The transcript links stronger word choice to improved analytical, creative, and connective thinking, plus better communication of complex emotions.

  7. 7

    Richer vocabulary is presented as a practical tool for resisting emotionally manipulative persuasion that relies on simplified language.

Highlights

Newspeak is used as the warning: removing words collapses the range of thought and expression.
The digital thesaurus is described with concrete scale—about 14,000 notes, 44,000 words, and roughly 420,000 links—making exploration feel like navigating a meaning network.
“Astonish” is used as an example of concept navigation: it connects to “surprise,” which sits under “actions of a cognitive nature,” enabling both synonym and category-level discovery.
Categories like “matter,” “senses,” and “geography” are positioned as a way to generate vocabulary that matches lived experience, not just writing style.

Topics

Mentioned