Playful LEGO Factory - Crafting Snap-Together Notes
Based on Zsolt's Visual Personal Knowledge Management's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Treat notes as modular LEGO blocks so ideas can be remixed later rather than forced into one rigid sequence.
Briefing
The core idea is to treat knowledge notes like LEGO blocks—modular, playful building pieces—rather than heavy, pre-ordered “zettels” that must snap into a single logical chain. Instead of laying tracks for one perfect train of thought, the approach builds a flexible “LEGO factory” where every note, icon, and illustration can be reused in new combinations as understanding evolves. Reading a book or listening to a podcast becomes a two-step process: first, assemble a scene from the author’s message (build what’s on the box), then take it apart and add pieces to a personal collection for later remixing.
That metaphor matters because it reframes note-taking from a compliance task—producing structured, logically connected outputs—into an exploratory craft. When notes are designed for reuse, creativity isn’t stifled by rigid sequencing. The system also encourages a more active relationship with ideas: sketching and writing aren’t just documentation, they’re tools for filtering, clarifying, and connecting.
To make the LEGO approach concrete, four creative constraints guide the workflow. First, when an idea resonates, it’s not only written down; it’s turned into a simple illustration. Creating a sketch acts as a filter because it’s easy to copy and paste a compelling sentence, but harder to translate it into a drawing. It also becomes a tool for understanding because the act of converting an abstract message into a simple visual forces deeper engagement.
Second, all illustrations use standard size fonts and icons. The goal is consistency—like LEGO studs that always connect—so cards tile neatly in storyboards, presentations, and page layouts. Titles use larger fonts than the body text, and callouts share the same small font size to keep the system visually coherent.
Third, illustrations are captured on standardized cards. The constraint of a post-it note or index card focuses attention on what’s essential, and multiple card sizes are supported so different “blocks” can fit together. A stencil library and a size guide help maintain the tiling logic.
Fourth, color palettes are limited. Using three colors—one main, one accent, and one secondary for details and lines—reduces decision fatigue and helps cards harmonize when assembled into larger visual narratives.
Once the front of the card is sketched, the back is used for notes and links, supporting atomic-note style connections in a Zettelkasten-like system. The workflow is implemented in Obsidian: the tab can be opened as markdown, and the back-side text helps articulate the idea and connect it to other notes. The method also emphasizes “ambidextrous thinking”: sketching and writing engage different cognitive modes, improving efficiency when both are used.
The practical payoff is a reusable library of visual blocks—cards that invite play—so ideas can be recombined over time rather than locked into a single, overly structured narrative path.
Cornell Notes
The LEGO approach to note-taking treats ideas as modular blocks instead of rigid, pre-ordered Zettels. Reading or listening starts with building a “scene” from the source, then disassembling it into reusable pieces for later remixing. Four constraints make the system practical: sketch resonant ideas (as both filter and understanding tool), use standard font/icon sizes so cards tile cleanly, capture visuals on standardized card sizes, and limit colors to a small palette for consistency. After sketching, the back of each card holds notes and links to support atomic connections in a Zettelkasten-like workflow. The result is a reusable visual library that encourages playful creativity and deeper engagement with meaning.
Why replace “logical trains of thought” with a LEGO metaphor in knowledge management?
How does sketching function as both a filter and a tool for understanding?
What does “standard studs” mean in practice for visual notes?
Why standardize card sizes and use a stencil library?
How does limiting color palettes improve the workflow?
How are the visual cards turned into connected knowledge in Obsidian?
Review Questions
- What tradeoff does the LEGO approach make compared with strict Zettelkasten sequencing, and how does that affect creativity?
- Which of the four constraints most directly improves reuse later, and why?
- How do sketching and writing together support “ambidextrous thinking” in this workflow?
Key Points
- 1
Treat notes as modular LEGO blocks so ideas can be remixed later rather than forced into one rigid sequence.
- 2
Use sketching when an idea resonates; drawing acts as both a filter (harder than copying text) and a deeper understanding exercise.
- 3
Standardize font and icon sizes so cards tile cleanly in layouts like storyboards and book-on-a-page spreads.
- 4
Capture visuals on standardized card sizes (with a size guide/stencil library) to keep the system compatible across different assemblies.
- 5
Limit colors to a small palette (e.g., three colors) to reduce decision fatigue and keep cards visually harmonious.
- 6
Store the meaning on the back of each card with notes and links, enabling atomic connections in a Zettelkasten-like workflow.
- 7
Use both drawing and writing to engage different thinking modes, aiming for efficiency when building a knowledge system.