Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Scopus New Update 2024 for Journals || SJR 2023 || Scopus Quartile || Important Scopus Update thumbnail

Scopus New Update 2024 for Journals || SJR 2023 || Scopus Quartile || Important Scopus Update

eSupport for Research·
5 min read

Based on eSupport for Research's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Verify a journal’s SJR/quartile on Scimago for the correct SJR year (e.g., SJR 2023), but don’t treat that as proof of Scopus indexing for your target publication year.

Briefing

Scopus’s latest SJR 2023 update matters for journal decisions because it changes how quickly and reliably a journal’s performance can be verified—and whether a journal is truly indexed for the year you plan to submit. The core workflow presented is to cross-check a journal’s SJR quartile and performance using Scimago (for SJR/Q ranking) and Scopus Search/Sources (for indexing status and coverage), rather than assuming that a journal appearing in SJR automatically means it is indexed in Scopus for your target year.

The transcript emphasizes that Scimago’s SJR data is year-wise and is built from Scopus-indexed information. Scimago publishes SJR results on its platform (with the update moving from earlier years like 2022 to the newly available SJR 2023). For authors, the practical takeaway is to use the SJR year and quartile (e.g., Q3) as a starting signal, then verify the journal’s Scopus coverage for the same period. A worked example shows an international journal with an H-index value and a quartile designation (Q3 for 2023) and an SJR score (noted as 27), with the message that a stable quartile can be a positive sign—especially when it aligns with Scopus coverage.

A major warning is timing risk: indexing and publication status can lag. Submitting based on last year’s SJR can backfire if the journal’s Scopus indexing changes before the paper is actually published. The transcript advises checking whether Scopus coverage and document output are consistent across the relevant year. It points to patterns that may signal trouble—such as sudden spikes in total publications or total documents in a particular year, which could indicate volume growth driven by revenue rather than research quality.

The transcript also stresses using multiple performance indicators, not just SJR. It mentions tracking H-index, total citations, total documents, and external site behavior like self-citation levels. It further highlights that SJR trends should be interpreted alongside Scopus coverage: if a journal’s SJR is available for 2023 but Scopus coverage for 2024 is unclear, the decision becomes riskier.

To resolve uncertainty, the transcript recommends a direct verification path. First, search the journal on Scopus Search (and Sources) using the journal’s ISSN, ideally without needing to log in. If the Scopus page lacks expected coverage details or document lists for the target year, the transcript advises contacting Scopus support via the “Contact Us” email form and providing the ISSN so Scopus can confirm whether the journal is currently indexed or under evaluation.

Finally, the transcript contrasts “long-term stable” journals—those that maintain quartile placement and remain indexed across multiple years (even if they fluctuate between Q3 and Q4)—with journals that show instability. The decision framework ends up being: verify Scopus indexing for the target year, confirm SJR/quartile alignment, check stability of H-index/SJR and document/citation trends, and use Scopus support when the indexing status is ambiguous.

Cornell Notes

The transcript lays out a practical checklist for authors trying to decide whether a journal is safe to submit to under Scopus indexing and SJR quartile guidance. It links Scimago’s SJR 2023 update to Scopus-indexed data, but warns that SJR visibility alone doesn’t guarantee the journal is indexed for the year when a paper will be published. The recommended method is to cross-check the journal on Scimago for SJR/quartile and on Scopus Search/Sources for coverage using the journal’s ISSN. If Scopus coverage details for the target year are missing or unclear, the transcript advises contacting Scopus support to confirm whether the journal is currently indexed or under evaluation. Stability in H-index/SJR and consistent document/citation patterns are treated as stronger signals than sudden publication spikes.

Why can’t authors rely only on SJR/quartile information when planning a submission?

Because SJR/quartile data (including the newly available SJR 2023) reflects Scopus-indexed performance, but indexing and publication timing can lag. The transcript warns that a journal might appear in SJR for 2023 while its Scopus status for the next year (e.g., 2024) may still be uncertain. Since publication can take months to a year, the journal could lose or change indexing status before the paper is published. That’s why Scopus coverage for the target year must be verified separately.

What is the recommended cross-check workflow for a journal?

Use Scimago to check SJR and quartile for the relevant year (e.g., Q3 for 2023) and note performance metrics like H-index and SJR score. Then go to Scopus Search/Sources and search by the journal’s ISSN (often pulled from the journal website). Confirm that Scopus coverage includes the year you care about and that document/citation information is present for that period.

What “red flags” does the transcript suggest when evaluating journal behavior?

It points to sudden increases in total publications or total documents in a specific year, especially if the volume rises sharply compared with surrounding years. The concern is that aggressive volume growth can be driven by revenue rather than research quality. It also treats decreasing trends in citation-related signals (like total citations or SJR stability) as a potential risk when paired with coverage uncertainty.

How should authors interpret stability versus fluctuation in quartile and metrics?

The transcript treats long-term stability as a positive sign. Journals that remain indexed across many years and maintain their quartile placement (even if they shift between Q3 and Q4) are considered lower risk. In contrast, journals that show inconsistent indexing coverage or large metric swings year-to-year—especially when Scopus coverage for the target year is unclear—are treated as more dangerous for submission planning.

What should authors do if Scopus coverage for the target year looks unclear?

If Scopus Search/Sources doesn’t show expected coverage or document lists for the target year, the transcript recommends contacting Scopus support through the “Contact Us” email form. Provide the journal’s ISSN and ask whether the journal is currently indexed in Scopus or under evaluation. A response is expected within one to two weeks.

Which metrics beyond SJR does the transcript encourage checking?

It highlights H-index, total documents, total citations (or citation-related performance), and self-citation behavior (described as “self sites” increasing being a less favorable sign). The transcript also emphasizes that external site behavior and stability of these metrics across the relevant years should be considered alongside SJR/quartile.

Review Questions

  1. When planning submission, what two separate verifications must be done—one for SJR/quartile and one for indexing—and why?
  2. What patterns in total documents/publications might indicate a potential quality or business-risk issue?
  3. If Scopus Search/Sources doesn’t show clear coverage for the target year, what is the recommended next step?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Verify a journal’s SJR/quartile on Scimago for the correct SJR year (e.g., SJR 2023), but don’t treat that as proof of Scopus indexing for your target publication year.

  2. 2

    Cross-check Scopus indexing and coverage using Scopus Search/Sources with the journal’s ISSN, ideally confirming that the target year appears in coverage.

  3. 3

    Account for publication lag: a paper may take months to a year, so indexing status can change between submission and publication.

  4. 4

    Watch for red flags such as sudden spikes in total publications/documents in a single year, which may suggest revenue-driven growth.

  5. 5

    Use multiple performance signals together—H-index, SJR stability, total citations/documents, and self-citation behavior—rather than relying on quartile alone.

  6. 6

    If Scopus coverage details are missing or unclear for the target year, contact Scopus support via the Contact Us form with the ISSN to confirm whether the journal is indexed or under evaluation.

  7. 7

    Prefer journals with long-term indexing stability (even if quartiles fluctuate slightly) over journals showing instability or unclear coverage for the year you need.

Highlights

Scimago’s SJR 2023 update is useful, but authors still must confirm Scopus coverage for the year their paper will effectively land in.
Sudden jumps in total publications or documents in a specific year are treated as a potential warning sign.
If Scopus Search/Sources doesn’t provide clear coverage for the target year, contacting Scopus support with the journal’s ISSN is the recommended escalation.
Long-term indexed journals that maintain relative quartile placement (even with Q3/Q4 movement) are presented as lower-risk choices.

Topics

Mentioned

  • SJR
  • SCI
  • H-index
  • ISSN
  • Q3
  • Q4