Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Submitting a manuscript to a Springer journal || Paper Submission via Editorial Manager || Hindi thumbnail

Submitting a manuscript to a Springer journal || Paper Submission via Editorial Manager || Hindi

eSupport for Research·
5 min read

Based on eSupport for Research's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Prepare the manuscript package in advance: manuscript file, cover letter, and any required declarations or supplementary documents.

Briefing

Springer journals submissions via Editorial Manager follow a repeatable workflow: prepare the manuscript package (manuscript file, cover letter, and any required declarations), create or link an Editorial Manager account, upload files through the journal’s submission portal, complete mandatory metadata (abstract, keywords, author details, declarations), then generate a PDF proof for final checking before approving submission.

The process starts before any website clicks. The submission package should be ready in advance: the manuscript itself, a cover letter addressed to the editor (including the article title, journal name, a brief statement of contribution, conflict-of-interest confirmation, confirmation that the work hasn’t been submitted elsewhere, and acknowledgements of any preprint version if applicable). The transcript also stresses that many journals require specific declarations—especially around conflicts of interest and whether the manuscript is under consideration elsewhere.

Account creation is the first operational hurdle for first-time authors. Editorial Manager uses Springer’s platform integration, and the workflow can be initiated through an ORCID-based registration option. Using ORCID is positioned as beneficial because publication metadata can flow into ORCID automatically after online publication, and reviewer credit can also be integrated. For first-time users, the account setup includes entering mandatory fields such as name, email, password, mobile number, and work address, plus selecting whether the user is available to review. The interface also supports adding multiple contact emails (separated by semicolons), and it provides recovery options like “forgot login credentials.”

Once logged in, the author selects “New Submission” and chooses the appropriate article type (the transcript uses “Regular Contribution” as the example). The system offers an optional step to link the ORCID record, then prompts for uploading files. The upload step distinguishes between the main manuscript file and additional items such as cover letter and supplementary or declaration files. The transcript highlights a key blind-review nuance: if the journal uses single-blind review, author identity must be handled correctly—typically by removing author names from the manuscript file and using a separate title page when required.

After file upload, the submission form requests structured information. Authors select the submission reason/region, confirm whether the manuscript has been previously submitted to the journal (and whether changes are being made), and complete research integrity and transparency items. The transcript specifically calls out selections related to data availability and data sharing statements (e.g., whether data will be available on reasonable request, and whether standard repositories apply). It also includes an “additional comments” field for the editorial team.

The final steps focus on correctness. Authors review the generated submission PDF (“Build PDF for Approval”), then use “View Submission” to verify that all metadata and files are correct. Only after cross-checking should “Approve Submission” be clicked, which completes the submission. The overall takeaway is that successful Springer submissions depend less on one-time uploading and more on careful completion of mandatory declarations, metadata accuracy, and proof-based verification before approval.

Cornell Notes

Springer journal submissions through Editorial Manager are built around a checklist: prepare the manuscript and required documents (including a cover letter and declarations), create an Editorial Manager account (optionally via ORCID), then start “New Submission.” During submission, authors upload the correct files (manuscript, cover letter, supplementary/declaration documents) and complete mandatory metadata such as title, abstract, keywords, author details, and required declarations. The workflow includes a “Build PDF for Approval” step so authors can proofread the final compiled submission before approving. This matters because many journals enforce strict requirements for conflicts of interest, prior submissions, and data availability statements, and mistakes can delay review or require resubmission.

What should be prepared before starting an Editorial Manager submission to a Springer journal?

The transcript emphasizes having the manuscript file ready, plus a cover letter and any required declaration/supplementary documents. The cover letter should include the editor’s address, the article title, the journal name, a concise statement of contribution (typically 1–2 points), conflict-of-interest confirmation, confirmation that the work hasn’t been submitted elsewhere, and acknowledgements. If an early version exists as a preprint, it should be mentioned in the cover letter, with the note that preprints are not treated as formal publication by many journals (as described in the transcript).

How does a first-time author create an account in Editorial Manager, and why is ORCID mentioned?

For first-time submissions, an account must be registered on Editorial Manager for that specific journal. The transcript describes two paths: registering directly or using ORCID integration (“Register Now” with an ORCID option). ORCID is presented as helpful because publication information can integrate into ORCID after online publication, and reviewer-related credit can also flow to ORCID. The account setup includes mandatory fields like name, email, password, mobile number, and work address, plus options such as reviewer availability.

What happens after logging in and selecting “New Submission”?

After login, the author activates the “New Submission” tab, selects the article type (example given: “Regular Contribution”), and can optionally link the ORCID record. The system then prompts for uploading files. The transcript notes that the main manuscript file is uploaded, and depending on how the manuscript is prepared, tables/figures may be included in the manuscript file or uploaded separately. Cover letter and supplementary/declaration files can also be uploaded in the same submission package.

How does the transcript handle blind review and author identity?

A key point is that author identity must be managed according to the journal’s review model. The transcript contrasts double-blind versus single-blind and states that author names should not appear in the manuscript file when identity must be hidden. It also mentions that a separate title page may be required for the blind review process, while the manuscript sent for review should omit author-identifying information.

Which metadata and declarations are highlighted as mandatory during the submission form?

The transcript calls out several mandatory or commonly required items: abstract and keywords, author details (including affiliations and author sequence), funding information (if any), and research integrity declarations. It specifically highlights data availability and data sharing statements (e.g., whether data are available in a standard repository or will be available on reasonable request). It also references ethical/institutional approval requirements when human subjects are involved, and confirmation items such as whether the manuscript was previously submitted to the journal and whether changes are being made.

What is the purpose of “Build PDF for Approval,” and when should “Approve Submission” be clicked?

“Build PDF for Approval” compiles the submission into a final proof document. The transcript advises waiting until the PDF is built, then using “View Submission” to verify that all entered information and uploaded files are correct. Only after cross-checking should the author click “Approve Submission,” because that action completes the submission.

Review Questions

  1. What specific elements should be included in the cover letter according to the transcript, and why is preprint disclosure treated as important?
  2. Which steps in the workflow ensure that author identity is handled correctly for blind review?
  3. Why does the transcript require building and reviewing a PDF proof before approving submission?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Prepare the manuscript package in advance: manuscript file, cover letter, and any required declarations or supplementary documents.

  2. 2

    Create an Editorial Manager account for the specific journal; ORCID integration can streamline identity and later credit/publishing metadata.

  3. 3

    Start submission via “New Submission,” select the correct article type, and upload the correct file set (manuscript, cover letter, supplementary/declaration files as applicable).

  4. 4

    Handle blind review requirements carefully by removing author-identifying details from the manuscript file when required and using a separate title page if the journal requests it.

  5. 5

    Complete mandatory submission metadata: title, abstract, keywords, author affiliations and order, funding information, and required declarations.

  6. 6

    Pay close attention to data availability and data sharing statements, including whether data are in standard repositories or available on reasonable request.

  7. 7

    Use “Build PDF for Approval” and “View Submission” to proofread the compiled submission before clicking “Approve Submission.”

Highlights

ORCID integration is presented as a practical shortcut: it can pull profile information into Editorial Manager and later integrate publication and reviewer credit into ORCID.
The submission upload step is not just file transfer—file selection must match the journal’s review format, including identity handling for blind review.
Data availability and data sharing statements are treated as core mandatory declarations, not optional add-ons.
The workflow’s safety net is the PDF proof: authors should verify everything after “Build PDF for Approval” and only then approve submission.

Topics

  • Springer Journal Submission
  • Editorial Manager Account
  • ORCID Integration
  • Blind Review Uploads
  • Data Availability Statements

Mentioned

  • ORCID