Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Supersymmetric Particle Found? thumbnail

Supersymmetric Particle Found?

PBS Space Time·
6 min read

Based on PBS Space Time's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Supersymmetry was proposed to address the hierarchy problem by linking fermions and bosons through a new symmetry, potentially stabilizing mass scales.

Briefing

Supersymmetry remains unconfirmed, but two puzzling ultra-high-energy radio bursts detected by ANITA have revived interest in a specific SUSY candidate: the stau. The events appeared to originate from directly below Antarctica—meaning the responsible particles would have had to traverse thousands of kilometers through Earth’s rock, magma, and iron—an outcome that clashes with expectations for standard-model neutrinos at those energies. With conventional explanations struggling to account for the timing and geometry, a proposed supersymmetric mechanism offers a way to make the signals fit.

The core problem starts with the hierarchy problem: the Standard Model cannot naturally explain why gravity is so vastly weaker than the other fundamental forces. Supersymmetry (SUSY) was designed to address this by introducing a symmetry between fermions (matter) and bosons (force carriers). In SUSY, every Standard Model particle gains a partner of the opposite type, and—crucially for collider searches—those partners are expected to be much heavier than their known counterparts. Many versions of SUSY would place the relevant masses near the electroweak energy scale, where the electromagnetic and weak forces unify. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has thoroughly tested the Standard Model and found the Higgs boson in 2013, yet it has not produced the expected supersymmetric particles. That absence doesn’t rule SUSY out; it may simply mean the new particles are heavier than anticipated, demanding higher-energy probes than the LHC can deliver.

Instead of building a larger accelerator, the search can use the universe as a particle accelerator. Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays interact with the cosmic microwave background (CMB), producing extremely energetic neutrinos. Neutrinos are hard to detect because they rarely interact, but they can pass through Earth if they’re not too energetic. ANITA (the Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna) is designed to catch the highest-energy neutrinos by scanning about 15 million square kilometers of Antarctic ice from a balloon platform roughly 37 kilometers above. When such a neutrino interacts in the ice, it can trigger a radio-frequency Cherenkov signal. ANITA’s key advantage is directional: it can distinguish neutrino-induced signals from other cosmic-ray radio flashes by focusing on neutrinos arriving from below.

ANITA reported two extremely high-energy radio bursts consistent with particles that traveled through the planet. Under standard-model expectations, the probability of seeing two tau-neutrino events of this type during ANITA’s observation window is estimated at about 1 in 3 trillion. To bridge that gap, astrophysicists Derek Fox, Steinn Sigurdsson, and collaborators point to a SUSY scenario involving the stau, the supersymmetric partner of the tau lepton. In their picture, an ultra-high-energy neutrino produces a stau on the far side of Earth; the stau then traverses Earth before decaying into a tau lepton near the detector, generating the characteristic double-burst radio signature.

Still, SUSY isn’t the only candidate. Other explanations include sterile neutrinos, unusually large bursts of ordinary neutrinos from astrophysical sources like supernovae or gamma-ray bursts, or simply gaps in understanding of neutrino propagation through Earth. One of the two ANITA events may line up with a distant supernova, but the chance association is only about 3%, and the supernova’s brightness seems insufficient to plausibly generate the required ultra-high-energy neutrinos. IceCube, the other major neutrino observatory, has limited sensitivity to these exact geometries, though a retrospective look found ambiguous possible tau-like events. The bottom line: the stau hypothesis is a tantalizing fit, not a discovery—confirmation will depend on more data and cross-checks across observatories.

Cornell Notes

ANITA’s detection of two ultra-high-energy radio bursts coming from directly below Antarctica has reignited interest in supersymmetry, specifically the stau. Standard-model neutrinos at these energies should lose too much energy while crossing Earth, making such “through-the-planet” tau-neutrino-like events extraordinarily unlikely (about 1 in 3 trillion for two events). A proposed SUSY mechanism suggests an ultra-high-energy neutrino could produce a stau on the far side of Earth; the stau would then travel through Earth and decay into a tau lepton near the detector, producing the observed radio Cherenkov signals. Other explanations—sterile neutrinos, rare astrophysical neutrino bursts, or improved modeling of neutrino propagation—remain on the table. More observations and careful scrutiny by IceCube and future ANITA flights are needed before claiming evidence for SUSY.

Why does supersymmetry matter for physics beyond the Standard Model, even though the LHC hasn’t found SUSY particles?

Supersymmetry was proposed to address the hierarchy problem: the Standard Model can’t naturally explain gravity’s extreme weakness compared with the other forces. SUSY introduces a symmetry linking fermions (matter) and bosons (forces), which can stabilize the relevant mass scales. Many SUSY versions predict partner particles near the electroweak energy scale, so the LHC should have produced them if that mass range were correct. The LHC’s null results don’t eliminate SUSY; they can instead imply the SUSY partners are heavier than expected, requiring higher-energy probes than the LHC can reach.

How can the universe act like a particle accelerator for this search?

Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays collide with photons of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Those interactions sap energy from cosmic rays and can produce extremely energetic neutrinos. Because neutrinos interact so weakly, they can travel through the CMB and even pass through Earth (for many energies) without being absorbed. Detecting the rare neutrino interactions that do occur lets scientists infer properties of the original cosmic rays at energies far beyond what the LHC can directly achieve.

What makes ANITA different from detectors like IceCube?

IceCube is a one-kilometer-cubed volume of Antarctic ice instrumented with photon detectors to catch neutrino interactions that produce visible Cherenkov light from charged particles (electrons, muons, tau particles). ANITA instead uses a radio antenna array on a balloon to detect radio-frequency Cherenkov signals from the highest-energy neutrinos. It scans roughly 15 million square kilometers from about 37 kilometers above Antarctica, looking for neutrino-induced radio bursts originating in the ice within hundreds of kilometers of the balloon.

Why did ANITA’s “from below” events create a problem for standard-model expectations?

ANITA expects the most energetic neutrinos to arrive at shallow angles that skim Earth’s arc, because the most energetic neutrinos lose energy while traversing Earth and may not make it through to the other side. The two observed bursts appeared to require particles that crossed the entire planet—thousands of kilometers through rock and iron. For tau-neutrino-like events of that type, the estimated chance of seeing two such events during ANITA’s observation period is about 1 in 3 trillion, making the standard-model accounting difficult.

How does the stau explanation work, and what would it imply?

The proposed SUSY explanation uses the stau, the supersymmetric partner of the tau lepton. In the scenario, an ultra-high-energy neutrino interacts on the far side of Earth to produce a stau. The stau is theorized to travel through Earth before decaying into a tau lepton near the detector. Because the tau is short-lived, it can generate a Cherenkov radio burst when created and another burst when it decays into secondary particles—matching ANITA’s observed “double-burst” signature. If correct, it would be evidence for SUSY via a specific particle beyond the Standard Model.

What competing explanations remain, and how do they affect confidence?

Competing ideas include sterile neutrinos (not part of SUSY), unusually large bursts of ordinary neutrinos from astrophysical events, and possible mis-modeling of neutrino propagation through Earth. One ANITA event may coincide with a distant supernova observed around the same time and location, but the chance association probability is only about 3%, and the supernova’s brightness seems too low to generate the needed ultra-high-energy neutrinos. The other event had no associated supernova or gamma-ray burst. IceCube’s archive contains ambiguous candidate events, but they are not definitive. These alternatives mean the stau interpretation is intriguing rather than conclusive.

Review Questions

  1. What hierarchy problem does supersymmetry aim to solve, and why does that motivate searching for SUSY partners near the electroweak scale?
  2. Describe how ANITA detects neutrinos and why “events from directly below” are especially challenging for standard-model neutrino propagation.
  3. Explain the stau-based mechanism for producing ANITA’s tau-like radio signatures and list at least two non-SUSY alternatives that could mimic the observations.

Key Points

  1. 1

    Supersymmetry was proposed to address the hierarchy problem by linking fermions and bosons through a new symmetry, potentially stabilizing mass scales.

  2. 2

    The LHC’s lack of supersymmetric particle detections doesn’t kill SUSY; it may indicate SUSY partners are heavier than expected.

  3. 3

    ANITA searches for ultra-high-energy neutrinos using radio-frequency Cherenkov signals from a balloon-based antenna array scanning millions of square kilometers of Antarctic ice.

  4. 4

    Two ANITA events consistent with particles traversing Earth are extraordinarily unlikely under standard-model tau-neutrino expectations (about 1 in 3 trillion for two events).

  5. 5

    A SUSY stau scenario offers a fit: an ultra-high-energy neutrino produces a stau on the far side, which then decays into a tau near the detector to generate the observed radio bursts.

  6. 6

    Other explanations—sterile neutrinos, rare astrophysical neutrino bursts, or improved modeling of neutrino propagation—remain viable until more data confirms the pattern across observatories.

Highlights

ANITA’s “from below” radio bursts imply particles that crossed thousands of kilometers through Earth, a geometry that standard-model neutrino physics struggles to accommodate at these energies.
The stau hypothesis turns the tau-neutrino puzzle into a SUSY mechanism: a stau could traverse Earth and decay into a tau that produces the characteristic double radio burst.
The hierarchy problem motivates SUSY searches, but the LHC’s null results shift attention toward higher-energy probes like cosmic-ray-produced neutrinos.
Even if one ANITA event lines up with a supernova, the association probability (~3%) and the supernova’s brightness make it an unlikely sole driver of the required ultra-high-energy neutrinos.

Topics

Mentioned

  • Derek Fox
  • Steinn Sigurdsson
  • LHC
  • SUSY
  • CMB
  • ANITA
  • IceCube