Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Syneos Health adopts Oracle APEX to better manage clinical trials thumbnail

Syneos Health adopts Oracle APEX to better manage clinical trials

6 min read

Based on Oracle Database Product Management's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Syneos Health selected Oracle APEX to meet an aggressive clinical trials delivery deadline while preserving pixel-perfect UI fidelity and supporting complex integrations.

Briefing

Syneos Health adopted Oracle APEX to accelerate the build and long-term management of a database-centric clinical trials application, aiming for pixel-perfect UI fidelity, smoother integrations, and faster delivery under an aggressive deadline. The project team weighed traditional high-code stacks such as Java, Node.js, and React against low-code options, concluding that APEX could cut development time by roughly an order of magnitude—about 10 times faster—while requiring a smaller team (around a quarter of the developers). That speed mattered because the requirements and UI markups were already well defined, and the timeline left little room for a slower, more code-heavy approach.

The decision also hinged on how much business logic lived in the Oracle database. With a substantial portion of logic documented and implemented at the database layer, the team expected APEX to translate that structure more cleanly than platforms that force more logic into the application tier. That database-centric design reduced friction in standing up the application and made it easier to replicate the existing UI markup faithfully—possibly even improving it. Integration needs were another deciding factor: the application had to connect with many other systems, and the organization already had Oracle’s suite in place, making APEX a practical fit for an environment where data and services are already anchored in Oracle.

Beyond initial delivery, the team emphasized maintainability over a multi-year horizon. Low-code was framed not just as a way to ship the first version, but as a way to keep evolving the system for five to ten years as new team members join. The concern wasn’t only changing features; it was onboarding people without forcing them through massive documentation or deep rewrites. APEX’s learning curve was described as unusually low for interns: Syneos Health hires roughly 20–25 interns each year, and they typically become productive within three months. While mistakes can still happen and experienced guidance is needed to navigate specialized features, the core approach was said to be easy for newcomers to pick up.

The broader strategy ties APEX to Syneos Health’s “intelligent enterprise” push, where AI is treated as an operational layer across the organization. The company’s AI roadmap includes two streams: traditional AI/ML for predictions such as which sites enroll faster, how quickly patients can be enrolled, and which sites need a “nudge”; and generative AI aimed at accelerating customer-facing work. Examples include an APEX application that can draft a new clinical trial protocol from scratch, plus a tool that lets users ask questions against a lengthy protocol document and get answers about what’s happening inside it.

A further planned capability—an “PDC” application—targets monitoring and oversight. With thousands of projects running simultaneously and project teams managing many sites, AI is used to distill and summarize site-level activity, surface risks and issues, and bubble up what project managers should focus on each morning. The transcript also outlines how AI becomes usable in practice: it requires data, knowledge/model training (not necessarily in APEX), and an algorithmic model, but the AI must be delivered through a UI/UX that feels non-intrusive. APEX’s REST handlers are positioned as the bridge, enabling AI algorithms to be exposed via APIs across cloud environments and inserted into the right screens to change business outcomes—without making users think about the underlying platform.

Cornell Notes

Syneos Health chose Oracle APEX to build a clinical trials management application faster and easier to maintain, especially because much of its business logic already sits in the Oracle database. The team expected APEX to deliver pixel-perfect UI fidelity while cutting development time to about one-tenth and reducing staffing needs to roughly a quarter compared with high-code approaches. Maintainability drove the decision too: low-code helps teams keep the system evolving over 5–10 years as new hires ramp up quickly (interns reportedly become productive within about three months). The company also links APEX to an “intelligent enterprise” strategy, using AI/ML for predictions and generative AI for tasks like drafting protocols and answering questions from long documents. APEX’s REST integration approach is presented as the way to embed AI into user workflows without disrupting day-to-day operations.

Why did Syneos Health view APEX as the right fit for a clinical trials management application?

The choice centered on speed, UI fidelity, and integration. With requirements and UI markups already prepared, APEX was expected to be about 10 times faster to develop than typical high-code stacks (Java/Node.js/React) and to require about a quarter of the development team. The team also prioritized “pixel perfect” replication of UI markup (and possibly improvements) and heavy integrations with other systems. Because the application was database-centric and a large share of business logic already lived in the Oracle database, translating that logic into APEX was expected to be easier than moving logic into an application layer.

How does putting business logic in the database affect the transition to APEX?

The transcript highlights a key practical factor: the more business logic resides in the database layer versus the application layer, the easier it is to translate into APEX. When logic is already documented and implemented in the database, APEX can stand up the application more smoothly. If logic must be re-created or translated outside the database, the transition becomes more complex and less straightforward.

What does “low-code” change beyond the initial build?

The emphasis shifts from first delivery to long-term evolution. The organization runs systems for years, and changes must continue as new team members join. Low-code is framed as a way to reduce the maintenance burden of onboarding and documentation-heavy workflows, helping teams make updates without massive rewrites or extensive documentation just to understand how to proceed.

What evidence is given about APEX’s learning curve and team productivity?

Syneos Health hires roughly 20–25 interns each year, and interns typically become very productive within three months. The transcript notes that mistakes still happen and experienced people are needed to guide specialized features, but the learning curve is described as low because APEX’s approach differs from what many students learn in college. Once people grasp the approach, productivity rises quickly.

How does Syneos Health connect APEX to its AI strategy?

AI is treated as part of an “intelligent enterprise” program with two streams. Traditional AI/ML supports predictions like which sites enroll faster, how quickly enrollment will happen, and which sites need a “nudge.” Generative AI targets acceleration of customer-facing work, including drafting brand-new clinical trial protocols from scratch and enabling chat-style Q&A against a 100-page protocol document. A planned “PDC” application adds monitoring and oversight by summarizing risks and issues across thousands of projects and bubbling up key concerns for project managers.

What technical principle is used to make AI usable inside customer workflows?

The transcript outlines a three-part requirement: data, knowledge/model training (not necessarily in APEX), and an algorithm/model. To make AI feel natural to users, it must appear in the UI/UX in a non-intrusive way—“AI you don’t even notice.” APEX’s REST handlers are positioned as the mechanism to connect UI screens to AI algorithms via APIs across cloud environments, with careful placement of AI into the right screen to change business outcomes.

Review Questions

  1. What conditions make a database-centric application easier to implement with APEX, according to the transcript?
  2. How do the transcript’s examples of generative AI (protocol drafting and protocol Q&A) differ from the AI/ML prediction use cases?
  3. Why is REST/API-based integration described as important for embedding AI into APEX-driven user experiences?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Syneos Health selected Oracle APEX to meet an aggressive clinical trials delivery deadline while preserving pixel-perfect UI fidelity and supporting complex integrations.

  2. 2

    A database-centric architecture—where business logic already lives in the Oracle database—makes APEX translation and application setup easier.

  3. 3

    The team expected APEX to reduce development time to roughly one-tenth and staffing needs to about one-quarter compared with high-code approaches like Java/Node.js/React.

  4. 4

    Low-code was valued for long-term maintenance, including faster onboarding of new team members over 5–10 years without heavy documentation burdens.

  5. 5

    Intern onboarding was cited as a strength: 20–25 interns per year typically reach high productivity within about three months.

  6. 6

    Syneos Health’s intelligent enterprise strategy uses both AI/ML predictions (site enrollment speed, nudges) and generative AI (protocol drafting and protocol Q&A).

  7. 7

    APEX’s REST handlers and API-first AI design are positioned as the bridge that embeds AI into non-intrusive UI/UX workflows across cloud environments.

Highlights

APEX was chosen partly because much of the business logic already sat in the Oracle database, making the transition smoother than moving logic into the application layer.
The maintainability argument centered on multi-year change management and onboarding—low-code helps teams keep systems current as new people join.
Generative AI use cases include drafting a brand-new clinical trial protocol from scratch and answering questions against a 100-page protocol document.
A planned PDC monitoring/oversight capability aims to summarize and surface risks across thousands of concurrent projects for busy project managers.
AI is framed as most effective when it’s delivered through REST-connected APIs inside the right UI screens, so users experience it as part of their job rather than an extra step.

Topics

  • Oracle APEX
  • Clinical Trials Management
  • Low-Code Development
  • AI/ML Predictions
  • Generative AI Protocols

Mentioned

  • Oracle APEX
  • Oracle Database
  • Oracle
  • Oracle’s suite
  • AI
  • ML
  • UI
  • UX
  • REST