Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Taking notes on people in Obsidian thumbnail

Taking notes on people in Obsidian

5 min read

Based on Nicole van der Hoeven's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Use a “listen first” rule: stay present during in-person conversations, then capture structured notes afterward.

Briefing

Taking notes on people in Obsidian is framed as a practical way to keep relationships intentional when life involves frequent travel and mostly online contact. The core idea is simple: instead of relying on memory, a person-focused note system helps prioritize who matters most, refresh context before reconnecting, and turn scattered conversations into reusable information—so meetings and follow-ups feel more personal and less like they’re starting from scratch.

The workflow starts with a “listen first” principle. Notes aren’t taken while someone is speaking face-to-face; attention stays on the person. On calls, there’s more room to type while maintaining eye contact, but the goal remains presence. When a meeting ends, a structured meeting template captures what was discussed and the next action. The template uses Templater strings to auto-fill fields like the date and meeting title, and it organizes content into Agenda, Log, and Next Action—so follow-through doesn’t get lost.

When the person is someone worth investing in, the system shifts from meeting notes to a dedicated “person note.” That note stores practical details (company, location, title), relationship timing (a “date last spoken” field), and a “follow up” flag used later to trigger catch-ups. The notes also include prompts for deeper context: how the conversation went, what topics came up, and background elements such as employment history, where someone has lived, family, and other personal anchors.

To make the notes more memorable—and to help guide future conversations—person notes borrow frameworks from tabletop role-playing games. The OGAS framework (Goal, Attitude, Stake) helps translate a person’s motivations and constraints into something actionable. Additional prompts draw from common RPG character tools like Ideals, Bonds, and Flaws, plus alignment-style axes (e.g., chaotic/neutral/lawful and good/neutral/evil). There’s even a playful “Magic the Gathering” color mapping to generate conversation hooks without turning people into rigid labels. The point isn’t categorization for its own sake; it’s using structured cues to remember what energizes someone and to suggest better ways to connect (for example, choosing hiking over a movie if nature is a strong interest).

The system also handles real-world constraints. At conferences, notes may be impossible in the moment, so thoughts get dumped later into a daily note as bullet points, then converted into person notes once there’s time. For name recall, social media becomes a tool: taking a photo during an event helps remember faces, and LinkedIn QR codes can speed up connection. For people encountered through content rather than in-person interaction, Readwise is used to capture and process articles, tweets, or posts.

Follow-up is automated with Dataview queries that surface people whose “follow up” flag is true and whose “date last spoken” is older than a set threshold (defaulting to a month in the example). A daily note then prompts the user to reach out, with an optional dice-roll string to introduce randomness.

Because these notes can include sensitive personal details, privacy is treated as non-negotiable. Person notes live in a dedicated folder excluded from Obsidian Publish filters, and a `publish:false` flag is set in the person template. For added protection, the vault can be encrypted via Obsidian Sync, and the Meld Encrypt plugin can create password-protected encrypted notes for particularly sensitive entries. The overall message is that this system isn’t weird—it’s a deliberate way to show care, reduce mental load, and maintain genuine connections over time.

Cornell Notes

The notes-on-people system in Obsidian is designed to make relationships easier to sustain when travel and online-only contact dominate. It combines structured meeting templates (Agenda, Log, Next Action) with richer person notes that track practical details, conversation context, and a “follow up” trigger based on when the last interaction happened. To keep notes useful rather than sterile, the method borrows RPG-style frameworks like OGAS (Goal, Attitude, Stake) and Ideals/Bonds/Flaws to generate conversation hooks and memory cues. Follow-ups are surfaced automatically in daily notes using Dataview queries, and privacy is protected by excluding the People folder from publishing and encrypting sensitive notes with Meld Encrypt.

How does the system balance note-taking with being fully present during conversations?

It follows a “listen in the first place” rule: notes aren’t taken while someone is speaking face-to-face, so attention stays on the person. On calls, there’s more leeway to type while maintaining eye contact, and notes are entered alongside the conversation. The meeting template is then used to capture Agenda, Log, and Next Action after the interaction, rather than interrupting the moment.

What fields make the meeting template useful for follow-through?

The meeting template is organized into Agenda, Log, and Next Action. Agenda holds prepared discussion points; Log captures what comes up during the meeting; Next Action records concrete follow-ups. Templater strings auto-fill the date and meeting title, and attendees are added so later queries can pull related meetings.

What makes the person note more than a contact list?

The person note stores both practical metadata (company, location, title) and relationship-specific context. It includes a “date last spoken” field and a “follow up” flag used to prompt catch-ups later. It also uses prompts for deeper content—like employment history, where someone has lived, family details, and personality observations—so future conversations start from remembered context rather than guesswork.

How do RPG-inspired frameworks improve memory and conversation planning?

The method uses OGAS (Goal, Attitude, Stake) to translate motivations and constraints into structured cues—e.g., a person may want to live in Africa (goal), be cheerful (attitude), but dislike spontaneity (stake). It also uses Ideals, Bonds, and Flaws to capture what someone values, who or what they’re attached to, and what trips them up. “Magic the Gathering” color mapping is used as a playful shortcut to generate conversation hooks, not to pigeonhole someone.

How does the system handle meeting people in conferences when note-taking isn’t feasible?

It relies on later capture: during the event, it remembers as much as possible, then dumps thoughts at breaks or at the end of the day into a daily note as bullet points (e.g., interests, location, goals). Afterward, those bullets get linked into proper person notes. It also uses photos and LinkedIn QR codes to reduce the friction of remembering names and connecting quickly.

What privacy controls are used when notes about people could be sensitive?

Person notes are kept in a dedicated folder (e.g., People) that is excluded from Obsidian Publish via publish filters, and the person template includes `publish:false`. If using Obsidian Sync, the person folder can be encrypted. For particularly sensitive entries, the Meld Encrypt plugin can create password-protected encrypted notes (with settings to avoid auto-remembering the password).

Review Questions

  1. Which specific person-note fields drive the follow-up reminders, and how does the daily note decide who to surface?
  2. How do OGAS and Ideals/Bonds/Flaws differ in what they capture about a person, and how does that affect future conversation choices?
  3. What steps prevent person notes from being accidentally published, and what’s the role of Meld Encrypt in that setup?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Use a “listen first” rule: stay present during in-person conversations, then capture structured notes afterward.

  2. 2

    Create meeting notes with Agenda, Log, and Next Action so follow-ups don’t get lost.

  3. 3

    Maintain separate person notes for people worth investing in, including practical details plus “date last spoken” and a “follow up” flag.

  4. 4

    Use RPG-inspired frameworks (OGAS, Ideals/Bonds/Flaws) to turn personality and motivations into actionable conversation cues.

  5. 5

    Automate catch-ups with Dataview queries that surface people whose follow-up flag is true and whose last interaction is older than a chosen threshold.

  6. 6

    Handle conferences by dumping rough bullets into daily notes later, then converting them into person notes when there’s time.

  7. 7

    Protect privacy by excluding the People folder from Obsidian Publish and encrypting sensitive notes with Meld Encrypt (and optionally encrypting via Obsidian Sync).

Highlights

The system treats follow-up as a scheduled behavior: a “follow up” flag plus “date last spoken” feeds a Dataview query that prompts outreach in daily notes.
RPG frameworks like OGAS and Ideals/Bonds/Flaws are repurposed as memory and conversation tools—turning motivations and constraints into practical hooks.
Privacy is built in from the start: person notes live in a non-published folder and can be encrypted with Meld Encrypt for sensitive details.

Topics

Mentioned

  • TTRPGs
  • OGAS
  • D&D
  • NPC
  • Dataview