Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Tell Your Research Story with Litmaps thumbnail

Tell Your Research Story with Litmaps

Litmaps·
5 min read

Based on Litmaps's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Import a complete set of relevant articles into Litmaps (via file import or manual DOI/ID import) to create a single map for the literature review.

Briefing

Litmaps helps researchers turn a pile of papers into a visual “research story” by importing relevant articles, mapping their relationships, and then reshaping the layout to highlight what matters most. The workflow starts with building a single Litmap from a complete set of sources—either by importing an existing literature review file or by manually bringing in articles using identifiers like DOIs or IDs. Once the papers are loaded, Litmaps can run an “explore related articles” search that expands the research library automatically, giving researchers a structured way to grow beyond the initial set.

After the map exists, the key move is changing the axes to tell a clearer narrative about the literature. By default, Litmaps sorts articles with publication date on the X-axis and citation count on the Y-axis, making it easy to spot older, highly cited “high impact” work in one corner and newer studies in another. But the axes aren’t fixed: researchers can switch to alternative measures that change what the map emphasizes. Sorting by “map connectivity” orders papers by how interconnected they are, which helps identify the most central work in a literature review. Other sorting options include reference count and a Litmaps-specific metric called “momentum.” Momentum adjusts citation counts for the natural advantage older papers have in accumulating citations, so newer papers that have unexpectedly high influence rise into view. A slider lets users tune how strongly that recency bias is corrected, balancing “surprising impact” against raw citation totals.

Litmaps also supports thematic storytelling through visual customization. Articles can be tagged into subtopics, and labels can be added to describe themes or concepts across the map. Titles can appear over the visualization, while per-article labels can be customized using a paintbrush tool. Researchers can further differentiate groups by assigning special icons and colors—using a “halo” ring to make certain papers stand out—so the map communicates structure at a glance rather than requiring readers to decode it from text.

The platform goes beyond existing databases by allowing users to add custom articles, including proposed or not-yet-included work, so the map can reflect the full arc of a research plan. Finally, Litmaps makes sharing straightforward: maps can be shared via URL or email, and images can be exported as screenshots with adjustable export parameters for use in papers, presentations, or other published work.

In short, Litmaps turns literature review work into an interactive, adjustable visual narrative—one that highlights impact, centrality, and recency-adjusted influence, while also making themes and future directions easy to communicate to others.

Cornell Notes

Litmaps turns a literature review into a visual “research story” by importing relevant papers into a single map, then expanding and reorganizing that map to reveal patterns. After import, users can run “explore related articles” to grow their research library and then adjust the axes to change what the layout emphasizes. Default sorting places publication date on the X-axis and citation count on the Y-axis, helping users spot older high-impact work versus newer studies. Alternative views like map connectivity and the momentum metric (which corrects citations for recency) help identify central papers and unusually influential recent work. Tags, labels, icons, and halos add thematic structure, and custom articles plus easy sharing (URL/email or exported images) support communication in publications and presentations.

What are the main ways to get papers into a Litmaps library before building the map?

Users can import an existing set of articles directly (for example, from a file such as a BibTeX RIS or PubMed file) or do a manual import using identifiers like DOIs or IDs from sources such as arXiv or OpenAlex. Litmaps also supports importing in APA Citation style. Once imported, the map can be explored and expanded.

How does changing the axes help communicate different parts of a literature review?

With default axes, publication date sits on the X-axis and citation count on the Y-axis, so older, highly cited papers cluster toward the top-left while newer work appears toward the bottom-right. Switching the X/Y measures changes the story: sorting by map connectivity highlights which papers are most central through interconnections, while sorting by reference count or momentum shifts attention to different signals of influence.

What is “momentum” in Litmaps, and why does it matter for identifying newer influential work?

Momentum adjusts citation counts based on how recent a paper is, accounting for the natural bias that older papers have had more time to accumulate citations. With momentum, newer papers that have an unexpectedly high citation level can stand out. A left-right cursor lets users tune the intensity of the recency adjustment to control how strongly the bias is corrected.

How can researchers make themes visible on the map rather than leaving everything as generic nodes?

Litmaps supports tagging and labeling. Users can click an article, hit “tag,” and assign it to a category for subtopics. They can also add labels: titles can be placed over the map, and per-article label text can be customized via the paintbrush tool. Icons and color halos can further distinguish specific papers or groups.

How does Litmaps support research plans that include papers not yet in its database?

Users can add custom articles. From the top of the map, they can click “add,” choose “custom,” and create a new custom article. They can input either an existing article not currently in the database or a proposed new work, then add it to the map so the visualization reflects future directions.

What sharing options make it practical to use a Litmaps visualization in published work?

Sharing can be done via URL or email using the share button. For publications, users can export images by taking a screenshot through the screenshot icon and adjusting export parameters, then place the resulting image wherever they discuss the literature review.

Review Questions

  1. How would you decide between using citation count versus map connectivity when reorganizing a Litmaps visualization?
  2. What problem does momentum address, and how does the cursor control the strength of that correction?
  3. Describe two different ways Litmaps customization (tags/labels/icons/halos) can change how readers interpret a literature review map.

Key Points

  1. 1

    Import a complete set of relevant articles into Litmaps (via file import or manual DOI/ID import) to create a single map for the literature review.

  2. 2

    Use “explore related articles” to expand the research library automatically from the imported set.

  3. 3

    Change the X/Y axes to shift the narrative—default date vs citations for impact and recency, or connectivity for centrality.

  4. 4

    Use momentum to surface newer papers with unusually high influence, and tune the recency bias correction with the cursor.

  5. 5

    Add structure with tags and labels, and differentiate groups with icons and halo colors for faster reader comprehension.

  6. 6

    Include future directions by adding custom articles, including proposed work not yet in the database.

  7. 7

    Share results through URL/email or export map images for use in papers and presentations.

Highlights

Default sorting places publication date on the X-axis and citation count on the Y-axis, making older high-impact work and newer studies visually distinct.
Map connectivity sorting helps identify the most central papers by emphasizing how interconnected the literature is.
Momentum corrects citation counts for recency, letting newer papers with unexpectedly high citations stand out.
Tags, labels, icons, and halo colors turn a generic citation map into a theme-driven research narrative.
Litmaps supports adding custom articles and sharing via URL/email or exported images for publication use.

Topics

  • Litmaps Import
  • Axis Sorting
  • Momentum Metric
  • Research Story Visualization
  • Sharing and Export

Mentioned