Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
The 8 best PhD side hustles | Earn money during your PhD thumbnail

The 8 best PhD side hustles | Earn money during your PhD

Andy Stapleton·
5 min read

Based on Andy Stapleton's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Choose side hustles that won’t distract from PhD research and that fit around the academic schedule rather than adding a competing fixed job.

Briefing

PhD life gets harder when finances stay constantly in the background—so the practical fix is building side income streams that don’t steal focus from research. The central idea here is to choose work that stays close to the PhD environment, minimizes distraction, and pays enough to matter, while avoiding time-heavy “sell your time” jobs that come with bosses, schedules, and mental load.

The approach starts with a clear filter: side hustles should not derail study progress, should be located near where the PhD work happens (often inside the university), and should fit the reality that “passive income” usually isn’t reachable early on. Content creation and long-term income products may be the ideal endgame, but they typically take years to build multiple streams—so during a PhD, the focus shifts to higher-value exchanges of time for money. The underlying logic is also skills-based: PhD students already have advanced knowledge and communication ability, which can be converted into paid help for others.

One-on-one tutoring is presented as the most lucrative option. The tutoring model relies on credibility—advertising qualifications and past results—and on charging rates that avoid racing to the bottom (roughly AUD 40–55). Exam-focused tutoring is framed as especially valuable because students pay for clarity and confidence when deadlines hit. Closely related are “exam cramming sessions,” run about two weeks before exams. These sessions use past exam papers from the prior five to six years, delivered as one-on-one or small group formats in university rooms, with pricing around AUD 30–50 per person depending on group size. The demand is explained through urgency: students who leave revision to the last moment create a market for structured, high-yield preparation.

Other income ideas lean into monetizing existing skills and university access. Etsy sales are suggested through examples like digital products (such as academic writing toolkits or planners) and handmade items made from hobbies—like turning stripped circuit boards into jewelry. Exam marking is another route: approaching lecturers with “ideal answers” and mark allocations, then grading large cohorts (the speaker describes learning where marks land after repeated marking). Teaching and lecturing also appear as a natural extension—offering lectures, tutorials, and workshops, including marking afterward, and sometimes even delivering masters-level lecture series tied to the student’s own research experience.

For universities, student services are highlighted as a hub for paid tutoring and workshop facilitation—covering essay help, English support for second-language students, math skills, and academic problem-solving. In lab-based disciplines, becoming a lab demonstrator is offered as a way to earn while guiding undergraduates through practical experiments like titration, distillation, crystallization, and separation techniques.

Finally, the transcript draws a line against the gig economy’s typical lack of security and worker protections, but makes an exception for user testing. Using platforms such as usertesting.com, the work involves about 20 minutes of completing tasks and speaking through thoughts, paying around $10 per session, with the benefit of professional structure and a relatively good pay-per-hour when opportunities accumulate through positive reviews.

Cornell Notes

The core message is that PhD finances can distract research, so side income should be chosen to protect study time. The most effective options prioritize minimal disruption, proximity to the university, and higher-value exchanges of time for money rather than long-term “passive” income building. One-on-one tutoring and short, exam-focused cramming sessions are described as especially lucrative because students pay for urgency and structured preparation using past exams. Additional routes include exam marking, paid lecturing and tutorials, student-services tutoring, and lab demonstrator roles for science PhDs. User testing is treated as a limited exception to concerns about gig-economy exploitation, with small but steady earnings (about $10 per ~20-minute session).

Why does the transcript emphasize “near the PhD” and “not distracting” when choosing side hustles?

The reasoning is practical: a part-time job can pull attention through fixed hours, a boss, and ongoing reminders to earn. Side hustles located near the PhD—often inside the university—reduce travel friction and make it easier to keep research as the priority. The goal is to earn extra money without turning the PhD into a second job.

What makes one-on-one tutoring and exam cramming sessions high-value during a PhD?

Tutoring converts advanced knowledge and communication skills into direct help. Exam cramming sessions add urgency: they run roughly two weeks before exams, use past exam papers from about five to six years, and focus on breaking down likely questions and answers. Pricing is described as AUD 30–50 per person for cramming (depending on group size) and about AUD 40–55 for tutoring, with demand driven by students who delay revision.

How does exam marking generate income without derailing research?

The method involves approaching lecturers with an offer to mark exams. Lecturers provide ideal answers and mark allocations; the marker then grades large sets (e.g., 100/200/300-level exams) using subject expertise to assign full, half, or incorrect marks. After repeated marking, patterns emerge—where marks are awarded becomes more automatic—so the work can be concentrated around exam periods.

What university-based teaching roles are suggested beyond tutoring?

Paid lecturing and tutorials are framed as feasible if interest is communicated to supervisors and departments. Examples include delivering chemistry 101 lectures, running workshops, and even teaching a masters-level lecture series tied to the student’s own research experience. Tutorials are described as question-driven sessions with exam practice from early in the year, plus preparation and marking time.

How do student services and lab demonstrator roles fit the “skills-to-income” theme?

Student services can employ PhD students as tutors or workshop facilitators for essay help, English support, math skills, and academic problem-solving. For science PhDs, lab demonstrator work involves guiding small groups through practical lab tasks (titration, distillation, crystallization, separation) and ensuring safe, correct technique—turning hands-on expertise into paid teaching.

Why is user testing treated differently from other gig-style work?

The transcript expresses skepticism toward gig economy practices that lack insurance, security, and guaranteed hours. User testing is presented as an exception because it is structured through platforms like usertesting.com, involves short sessions (about 20 minutes), and pays around $10 per test, with opportunities that can increase as more positive reviews accumulate.

Review Questions

  1. Which criteria should a PhD side hustle meet to avoid harming research progress, and how do tutoring and cramming satisfy them?
  2. What operational details make exam cramming sessions effective (timing, materials used, and pricing structure)?
  3. How do exam marking and lecturing differ in skills required and in how they fit into the academic calendar?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Choose side hustles that won’t distract from PhD research and that fit around the academic schedule rather than adding a competing fixed job.

  2. 2

    Prioritize university-adjacent opportunities to reduce friction and maximize focus, especially during the early years when passive income isn’t realistic.

  3. 3

    Use advanced PhD skills—teaching, communication, and subject mastery—to create paid value, particularly for exam preparation.

  4. 4

    One-on-one tutoring can command strong rates (about AUD 40–55) when qualifications and results are clearly communicated.

  5. 5

    Exam cramming sessions work well when they’re time-bound (around two weeks before exams), structured around past papers, and delivered in university spaces.

  6. 6

    Exam marking can be a concentrated income source by leveraging provided ideal answers and mark allocations, with grading becoming more efficient after repetition.

  7. 7

    User testing can be a limited option if it offers structured work and reasonable pay (about $10 for ~20 minutes), even while avoiding more exploitative gig-economy arrangements.

Highlights

The most lucrative path described is one-on-one tutoring, priced around AUD 40–55, built on credibility and strong communication.
Exam cramming sessions are positioned as a high-demand service: run about two weeks before exams using past papers from the last five to six years, charging roughly AUD 30–50 per person.
Exam marking is offered as a low-distraction side income by approaching lecturers for ideal answers and mark schemes, then grading large cohorts during exam periods.
Paid teaching—lectures, tutorials, and workshops—can generate income while leveraging research expertise, including masters-level lecture series.
User testing via usertesting.com is treated as a practical exception to gig-economy concerns, paying about $10 per ~20-minute session.

Topics

Mentioned