Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
The Worlds Largest DDos Attack 3.8 Tbps thumbnail

The Worlds Largest DDos Attack 3.8 Tbps

The PrimeTime·
5 min read

Based on The PrimeTime's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Cloudflare reports mitigating a month-long campaign of hyper-volumetric Layer 3/4 DDoS attacks, including a peak of 3.8 Tbps.

Briefing

Cloudflare’s DDoS defenses mitigated a record-setting Layer 3/4 attack peaking at 3.8 terabits per second and doing so with fully autonomous, server-level detection and mitigation. The campaign spanned roughly a month starting in early September, during which Cloudflare’s systems absorbed more than 100 hyper-volumetric Layer 3/4 DDoS events—many topping 2 billion packets per second—while targeting the same customer across multiple attack waves. The scale mattered because these attacks aim at bandwidth saturation and CPU/resource exhaustion, which can knock out both unprotected internet properties and services protected by providers lacking sufficient network capacity.

The attack traffic was predominantly UDP sent to fixed ports, with sources distributed globally. Cloudflare observed traffic coming from multiple compromised device types, including Microtik devices, DVRs, and web-facing systems, and also flagged large volumes originating from compromised ASUS home routers tied to a recently discovered CVE-9.8 vulnerability. The write-up describes how Layer 3/4 DDoS works in practice: high packet rates force victims to spend CPU cycles parsing and routing packets before they even reach applications, while volumetric floods overwhelm the “pipe” of available ingress bandwidth. In both cases, attackers rely on botnets—often built from IoT and other internet-connected devices—to generate enough traffic to exceed what the target can handle.

Cloudflare’s mitigation approach centers on anycast and a software-defined, distributed defense stack. Anycast lets a single IP address be served by multiple geographically dispersed network nodes, so botnet traffic lands across the network rather than concentrating at one choke point. From there, Cloudflare uses an in-line packet processing pipeline: an XDP-based sampling layer feeds suspicious traffic attributes into a denial-of-service daemon (labeled “DSY” in the transcript). DSY generates “dynamic fingerprints” from observed packet patterns, selects the most effective mitigation rules using streaming algorithms, and then pushes those rules into kernel-level packet filtering.

The actual dropping happens at the network interface card level using an extended Berkeley Packet Filter (eBPF) program, designed to discard bad packets with minimal CPU overhead. The system runs across servers and data centers without out-of-path scrubbing centers, and it shares mitigation instructions via gossip/multicast both locally and globally so that localized or widespread attacks can be handled quickly. Cloudflare also pairs the dynamic fingerprinting engine with additional protections for TCP and DNS-based DDoS, plus traffic profiling and machine learning classification for anomaly detection.

Beyond the technical claims, the transcript includes a broader critique of IoT—arguing that cheap, internet-connected devices (from routers to webcams and appliances) expand the pool of compromised endpoints that power botnets. The practical takeaway is that the largest DDoS campaigns increasingly combine massive packet rates, UDP floods, and widely distributed compromised devices, while mitigation increasingly depends on distributed network capacity and automated, in-line filtering rather than manual or centralized response.

Cornell Notes

Cloudflare reports mitigating a month-long campaign of hyper-volumetric Layer 3/4 DDoS attacks, including a public record peak at 3.8 Tbps. The traffic was largely UDP to fixed ports and came from globally distributed compromised devices, including Microtik devices, DVRs, and compromised ASUS home routers tied to a CVE-9.8 vulnerability. The defense relies on anycast to spread traffic across the network, then uses XDP sampling plus a denial-of-service daemon (DSY) to generate dynamic fingerprints and select mitigation rules. Those rules are deployed in-line at the NIC level using eBPF to drop suspicious packets with low CPU cost. The system is software-defined and autonomous across servers and data centers, with gossip/multicast to synchronize mitigations quickly.

Why do Layer 3/4 DDoS attacks become so disruptive even before traffic reaches an application?

Because high packet rates force victims to spend CPU cycles parsing and routing packets in the kernel and network stack. The transcript frames this as “pre-packet work”: Layer 3 headers (IP) and Layer 4 headers (TCP/UDP) must be parsed and routed to the correct socket, and additional processing can occur before application code runs. When attackers send enough packets, the CPU becomes saturated, denying service to legitimate users even if the application itself could otherwise handle the payload volume.

What role does bandwidth saturation play in these attacks?

Bandwidth saturation targets the maximum ingress data rate a service can accept. The transcript uses the “pipe” analogy: if attackers push more garbage data into the pipe than the service can deliver, both malicious and legitimate traffic get discarded upstream. This is why volumetric floods can knock out services that lack sufficient network capacity or global distribution to absorb traffic without harming performance.

How does anycast change where DDoS traffic lands?

Anycast allows the same IP address to be advertised by multiple machines worldwide. Packets sent to that IP are handled by the closest node, so a distributed botnet’s traffic arrives across many network locations rather than concentrating at a single point. The transcript also notes that this helps allocate compute and bandwidth resources near the region generating the most legitimate and attack traffic.

What is “dynamic fingerprinting,” and how does it connect to mitigation?

Dynamic fingerprinting refers to DSY creating multiple “permutations of fingerprints” from sampled suspicious traffic patterns. DSY then uses streaming algorithms to identify the most optimal fingerprints to mitigate the observed attack. Once an attack is qualified, DSY pushes mitigation rules into the data path so that matching packets can be dropped quickly and precisely.

Why does Cloudflare emphasize in-line packet dropping with XDP and eBPF?

The goal is to discard bad packets efficiently without consuming excessive CPU on the server. The transcript describes XDP sampling at the network interface level, followed by eBPF programs that run in kernel space to drop/forward/modify packets directly at the NIC level. This reduces overhead compared with heavier, out-of-path scrubbing approaches.

What kinds of compromised devices are implicated as sources of the attacks?

The transcript names multiple categories: Microtik devices, DVRs, and web-facing systems. It also claims that high-bandwidth attacks appear to originate from many compromised ASUS home routers, allegedly exploited via a recently discovered CVE-9.8. The broader point is that botnets built from internet-connected devices can generate both high packet rates and large volumetric floods.

Review Questions

  1. What two resource bottlenecks—CPU cycles and network bandwidth—are targeted by Layer 3/4 DDoS, and how does each bottleneck affect legitimate traffic?
  2. How do anycast and in-line eBPF-based dropping work together to reduce the impact of a distributed attack?
  3. What does DSY do after receiving XDP samples, and why is “dynamic fingerprinting” important for mitigation accuracy?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Cloudflare reports mitigating a month-long campaign of hyper-volumetric Layer 3/4 DDoS attacks, including a peak of 3.8 Tbps.

  2. 2

    The attacks were predominantly UDP floods to fixed ports, with globally distributed sources and very high packet rates (often exceeding 2 billion packets per second).

  3. 3

    Cloudflare attributes traffic to compromised devices such as Microtik devices, DVRs, and compromised ASUS home routers tied to CVE-9.8.

  4. 4

    The defense uses anycast to distribute incoming attack traffic across geographically close network nodes, reducing concentration at any single choke point.

  5. 5

    XDP sampling feeds suspicious packet attributes into a denial-of-service daemon (DSY), which generates dynamic fingerprints and selects mitigation rules using streaming algorithms.

  6. 6

    Mitigation is deployed in-line at the NIC level using eBPF to drop bad packets with minimal CPU overhead, avoiding reliance on out-of-path scrubbing centers.

  7. 7

    Cloudflare describes the system as autonomous and software-defined across servers and data centers, with gossip/multicast to synchronize mitigation instructions globally.

Highlights

A peak Layer 3/4 DDoS attack reached 3.8 terabits per second, with mitigation described as fully autonomous.
The campaign involved UDP floods to fixed ports and many events exceeding 2 billion packets per second.
Cloudflare’s approach combines anycast distribution with XDP sampling and eBPF in-line dropping at the NIC level.
Dynamic fingerprinting (DSY) selects mitigation rules based on sampled traffic patterns and pushes them into the data path quickly.

Topics

  • DDoS Mitigation
  • Layer 3/4 Attacks
  • Anycast Defense
  • eBPF
  • IoT Botnets

Mentioned

  • Cloudflare
  • Cloudflare CDN
  • Cloudflare WAF
  • Cloudflare Spectrum
  • Cloudflare Magic Transit
  • Microtik
  • ASUS
  • Berkeley Packet Filter
  • eBPF
  • XDP
  • Berkeley packet filter
  • DDoS
  • UDP
  • L3
  • L4
  • HTTP
  • CDN
  • WAF
  • eBPF
  • XDP
  • CPU
  • DNS
  • TCP
  • IP
  • DSY
  • IoT
  • CVE