Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
These New ChatGPT Features Will Change How You Do Research Forever! thumbnail

These New ChatGPT Features Will Change How You Do Research Forever!

Andy Stapleton·
5 min read

Based on Andy Stapleton's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Customized chat GPT lets users set persistent research-focused traits (like “academic” and “straight shooting”) and personal context for more consistent outputs.

Briefing

ChatGPT’s biggest research upgrade is “Customized chat GPT,” which lets users set a persistent persona and preferences—then apply those settings across future conversations. Instead of starting from scratch each time, researchers can define how the assistant should behave (for example, “academic,” “straight shooting,” and “tell it like it is”) and what it should know about them (such as being a PhD student working on specific device areas). The practical payoff is more consistent outputs: the assistant can tailor tone and formatting to an academic environment and respond in a way that better matches a user’s goals.

The customization flow also includes an “advanced” layer that controls capabilities. Users can toggle features like web search and image creation, and can enable “canvas” for collaborative writing—useful when drafting sections of papers with iterative edits. There’s also an “enable for new chats” option, letting people decide whether the personalization should carry forward automatically. The overall message is that researchers can make ChatGPT behave like a reliable writing partner with stable expectations, rather than a generic chatbot that needs constant re-instruction.

A second major feature, “Projects,” shifts ChatGPT from one-off Q&A into organized research workspaces. Each project can be given a name (like “new paper”), and the assistant can be configured for writing collaboration (including canvas) while relying on user-provided files as its knowledge base. Projects can’t search the web directly, so the information comes from uploaded documents—such as reference papers, thesis samples, or datasets. The key capability is “instructions” inside each project: users can specify what the assistant should do with the attached materials, such as generating an introduction and abstract from references, or structuring a thesis using examples.

Projects also support segmented workflows. Instead of mixing unrelated drafts and notes, users can create separate project folders for different papers or research questions, keeping instructions and files aligned with each specific task.

The third update is “Tasks” (in beta), aimed at scheduling recurring actions like daily summaries. Users can create scheduled prompts such as “send AI news summarize AI news” or reminders at a specific time. The scheduling logic depends on providing clear timing details (including AM/PM and frequency). In practice, reliability is uneven—runs may appear inconsistently, and the interface can be “hit or miss” while the feature is still under development. Still, when it works, Tasks can deliver notifications on desktop or phone and can send email reminders, turning research monitoring and routine prompts into an automated cadence.

Taken together, these features move ChatGPT toward a more research-native workflow: persistent personalization, file-grounded project drafting, and scheduled follow-ups for ongoing information gathering—while leaving some rough edges in the beta scheduling layer.

Cornell Notes

Customized chat GPT lets researchers set a persistent persona (e.g., academic, straight-shooting) and personal context (like being a PhD student working on specific topics). Users can also toggle capabilities such as web search and enable canvas for collaborative writing, with an option to apply settings to new chats.

Projects create dedicated workspaces for a paper or thesis, where uploaded files become the knowledge base and “specific instructions” constrain what the assistant produces (like drafting an introduction or abstract from references). Separate projects help keep different papers and workflows organized.

Tasks (beta) schedules recurring prompts—daily news summaries or reminders—delivering notifications and sometimes email. Scheduling requires precise timing (AM/PM), and results can be inconsistent while the feature matures.

How does “Customized chat GPT” improve research workflows compared with starting new chats from scratch?

It lets users define a stable persona and preferences once, then reuse them across future conversations. The customization includes (1) an “introduce yourself” style prompt (e.g., calling the assistant “Dr Andy” and setting an academic identity), (2) selectable traits such as “academic,” “straight shooting,” and “tell it like it is,” and (3) personal context like being a PhD student and working on a topic. With “enable for new chats,” those settings can apply automatically, reducing the need to repeatedly restate tone and constraints.

What controls can researchers adjust under the customization “advanced” options?

The advanced settings include toggles for capabilities such as web search and image creation (the transcript shows turning off image creation). It also includes “canvas,” which supports collaborative writing workflows. There’s an “enable for new chats” switch so users can decide whether these capability changes persist for future sessions; if the assistant’s behavior becomes undesirable, the user can turn the setting off and save.

Why are Projects useful for writing a paper or thesis, and how do they handle information?

Projects act like organized workspaces tied to a specific document goal (e.g., “new paper”). They can’t search the web, so they rely on user-uploaded files—reference papers, thesis samples, or data—as a knowledge base. The assistant then uses project-specific “instructions” to generate outputs grounded in those files, such as drafting an introduction or abstract from attached references.

How do “specific instructions” inside a Project change the assistant’s output?

Instead of guessing what the user wants, the assistant is constrained by explicit directives. For example, a user can instruct it to generate an introduction and abstract from attached references, or to structure a thesis abstract using a sample thesis provided in the project files. The transcript’s example output for an abstract includes sections like research topic introduction, research objectives, methodology, and a conclusion summarizing overall achievements.

What makes “Tasks” tricky to use right now, and what details matter most?

Tasks is in beta and can be inconsistent. The transcript emphasizes that scheduling requires clear frequency and time formatting, including AM/PM; missing or incorrect timing can cause the assistant to respond immediately rather than scheduling. Even when created, scheduled results may not appear where expected, and runs can be “hit or miss” while the feature is still being polished.

Review Questions

  1. When setting up Customized chat GPT, which two categories of inputs (persona vs. personal context) most directly affect the assistant’s tone and relevance?
  2. In a Project, what are the two main ways to steer outputs: (1) how information is provided and (2) how behavior is constrained?
  3. What timing details must be included for Tasks to schedule correctly, and what reliability issues were observed during beta testing?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Customized chat GPT lets users set persistent research-focused traits (like “academic” and “straight shooting”) and personal context for more consistent outputs.

  2. 2

    Advanced customization toggles capabilities such as web search and image creation, while “canvas” supports collaborative drafting workflows.

  3. 3

    Projects provide file-grounded research workspaces where uploaded documents become the knowledge base, since web search isn’t available inside a project.

  4. 4

    Project-specific instructions help constrain outputs—for example, generating an introduction and abstract from references or structuring a thesis abstract using sample theses.

  5. 5

    Separate Projects can organize different papers or research ideas, keeping instructions and files from mixing.

  6. 6

    Tasks (beta) can automate recurring prompts and reminders, but scheduling requires precise frequency and AM/PM formatting.

  7. 7

    Task reliability is uneven in beta: scheduled results may appear inconsistently and may require troubleshooting (e.g., refreshing or re-checking task lists).

Highlights

Customized chat GPT turns tone and context into persistent settings—so academic writing doesn’t require re-instruction every session.
Projects let researchers upload references and then generate sections like introductions and abstracts using project instructions, without relying on web search.
Tasks aims to schedule recurring research prompts, but beta behavior can be inconsistent unless timing details are specified correctly.

Topics

  • Customized ChatGPT
  • Research Projects
  • Project Instructions
  • Canvas Writing
  • Scheduled Tasks