Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Useful browser extensions for PhD students and researchers | ALL FREE thumbnail

Useful browser extensions for PhD students and researchers | ALL FREE

Andy Stapleton·
5 min read

Based on Andy Stapleton's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Science Research Assistant speeds up literature reviews by searching across multiple configured publishers and opening results in many tabs from one query.

Briefing

A set of free Chrome (and Chromium-based) browser extensions is positioned as a practical toolkit for speeding up literature searches, organizing notes, and reducing friction when accessing academic papers—especially during the early, messy stages of a PhD or research project. The through-line is simple: fewer tab-hopping chores, faster discovery, and better capture of ideas so researchers spend more time reading and synthesizing instead of hunting.

At the top of the list is Science Research Assistant, aimed squarely at literature review workflows. It lets users choose which publishers and subject areas to search across (including options spanning general science publishers and categories like medicine, biology, chemistry, and social sciences). After selecting targets, a user can run a query such as “flexible organic photovoltaics,” which triggers multiple searches at once and opens results in many tabs—covering sources like Wikipedia, Google Scholar, and PLOS Medicine (along with other configured outlets). The payoff is time savings: the extension automates the “grunt work” of running the same search across multiple engines and destinations.

For capturing and structuring reading notes, Diigo is presented as a browser-based research organizer. It supports bookmarking, annotating PDFs, highlighting screenshots, and saving video screenshots. Its standout feature is an Outliner that turns selected text into draggable bullet points while preserving hyperlinks back to the original source. Users can also attach highlights and comments to web pages, so an idea captured during reading can later be revisited in an organized, reference-linked format. The emphasis is on early-stage synthesis—useful for introductions and literature review scaffolding—rather than long-term project management.

Google Scholar’s browser extension is framed as the obvious companion for discovery. It adds quick access to Scholar search from the current page, surfaces whether a PDF or related materials are available, and provides settings to optimize how results are analyzed.

Lazy Scholar shifts attention to paper triage. When browsing a paper page, it provides a compact toolbar with a citation snapshot, citation counts, Altmetric score, journal-related information, and navigation aids like an abstract/methods outline. It’s designed to help readers jump directly to relevant sections (e.g., conclusions or specific tests) without endless scrolling.

Snippet is recommended for capturing “bits of information” across the web. Users select text on any page, drag to save it into a Snippet dashboard, and retain the source link plus summaries/snips—useful for collecting inspiration during broad, exploratory research.

On access, Unpayable is offered as a legal route to full-text PDFs: a green indicator signals an open-access version is available; otherwise it reports that no legal open-access copy could be found. For situations where access remains blocked, Sci-Hub X is mentioned as a controversial workaround that attempts to open paywalled papers by redirecting to Sci-Hub.

Finally, Forest is included for focus management. It encourages deep work by growing a “forest” while users stay focused for set intervals, with options like block lists (e.g., blocking Reddit) to reduce distractions. The overall message: combine discovery, note capture, access, and focus tools to make research workflows faster and more sustainable.

Cornell Notes

The transcript recommends a bundle of free browser extensions to make research faster and more organized. Science Research Assistant automates multi-source literature searches by letting users select publishers and run a query across many destinations at once. Diigo helps researchers bookmark and annotate PDFs/screenshots and then organize selected text into an Outliner with draggable bullet points linked back to the original sources. Lazy Scholar and Google Scholar extensions speed up paper discovery and scanning by surfacing citations, metrics, and navigation shortcuts. For access and productivity, Unpayable finds legal open-access PDFs, Sci-Hub X is offered as a controversial alternative, and Forest supports deep-focus sessions by visualizing sustained attention.

How does Science Research Assistant reduce the time cost of a literature review search?

It lets users pre-select where to search (by publisher type and subject area such as medicine, biology, chemistry, and social sciences). After setup, a single query (e.g., “flexible organic photovoltaics”) triggers searches across the configured sources and opens results in multiple tabs at once. The workflow avoids repeating the same search across separate engines and destinations, including sources like Google Scholar and PLOS Medicine (plus other outlets the user configures).

What makes Diigo useful specifically for organizing early literature review ideas?

Diigo supports bookmarking and annotation (including PDF and screenshot highlighting) and includes an Outliner for turning selected text into draggable bullet points. When users drag selected text into the Outliner, the notes become structured and remain linked to the original page, preserving provenance. It also allows highlights and comments to be saved on web pages so the captured context returns when revisiting the page.

What does Lazy Scholar add when reading a paper online?

Lazy Scholar overlays a compact toolbar on paper pages that provides a citation snapshot and related metrics such as citation counts and Altmetric score. It also offers navigation shortcuts—like an abstract/methods outline—so readers can jump to relevant sections (e.g., conclusions or specific tests) without scrolling through long HTML documents.

How do Unpayable and Sci-Hub X differ in their approach to getting full-text papers?

Unpayable checks for legal open-access versions. A green tab indicates a full paper is available; if not, it reports that no legal open-access version could be found. Sci-Hub X is described as a redirect to Sci-Hub to open paywalled papers, presented as a controversial option used when institutional access fails or when researchers need to quickly verify usefulness.

How does Forest support research productivity beyond note-taking?

Forest is designed to encourage sustained focus by growing a “forest” during timed deep-work sessions. Users can set focus duration and use tools like block lists (the transcript mentions blocking Reddit) to reduce distraction, tracking the periods when attention stays on the task.

Review Questions

  1. Which extension would you use to run one query across multiple publishers at once, and what setup step makes that possible?
  2. How does Diigo’s Outliner preserve the connection between notes and their sources?
  3. What indicators or navigation features does Lazy Scholar provide to help scan a paper efficiently?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Science Research Assistant speeds up literature reviews by searching across multiple configured publishers and opening results in many tabs from one query.

  2. 2

    Diigo combines annotation (PDFs, screenshots, video screenshots) with an Outliner that turns selected text into draggable, hyperlink-backed bullet points.

  3. 3

    Google Scholar’s extension adds quick Scholar access and surfaces whether PDFs or related materials are available from the current page.

  4. 4

    Lazy Scholar provides a compact on-page toolbar with citation details, metrics like Altmetric score, and navigation shortcuts such as an abstract/methods outline.

  5. 5

    Unpayable helps find legal open-access full-text PDFs by showing a green indicator when an open version exists.

  6. 6

    Sci-Hub X is presented as a controversial alternative for accessing paywalled papers when other routes fail.

  7. 7

    Forest supports deep work by visualizing focus time and using block lists to limit distractions.

Highlights

Science Research Assistant turns one search into many by pre-selecting publishers and opening multi-source results in separate tabs instantly.
Diigo’s Outliner lets researchers drag selected text into structured bullet points while keeping hyperlinks back to the original pages.
Unpayable uses a green indicator to signal legal open-access availability; when it’s not green, it reports no legal open-access version was found.
Forest gamifies focus by growing a “forest” during timed sessions, with options like blocking Reddit to reduce distraction.

Topics