Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Why Most Founders Talk to the Wrong People First | Founder Fridays thumbnail

Why Most Founders Talk to the Wrong People First | Founder Fridays

Notion·
5 min read

Based on Notion's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Founders should prioritize talking to customers in the first six months, because paying buyers reveal urgency and fit faster than advice from founders or VCs.

Briefing

Brand measurement startup Tracksuit built its early traction by treating marketers’ boardroom needs—not founders’ opinions or VC narratives—as the primary source of truth. The core lesson is blunt: in the first six months, founders should prioritize direct customer conversations over advice from other founders or venture capitalists, because paying customers reveal whether a problem is urgent enough to fund a solution.

Tracksuit’s origin story starts with a specific gap: marketers lacked a common language for how to quantify brand value and connect brand spend to ROI. The company formed around the hypothesis that brand effectiveness had become harder to prove after the “cookie apocalypse,” when clicks and direct attribution stopped being a reliable measure. At the same time, marketers were shifting back toward full-funnel strategies and brand building—billboards, TV, and awareness campaigns—but board-level skepticism remained. Tracksuit positioned itself as a way to translate brand activity into measurable outcomes such as awareness, consideration, preference, and brand sentiment, then connect those shifts to downstream metrics like cost of acquisition and lifetime value.

Convincing early buyers didn’t hinge on a polished product. Tracksuit began as a white-labeled data visualization app and validated demand through conversations. Connor Ashbold describes a practical rule: without a product, the only real offer is the chance to discuss problems and test whether the proposed solution fits. In their case, a list of 100 marketers produced commitments surprisingly quickly—by the 68th conversation, 11 marketers had signed 12-month contracts. That cash flow mattered because the company was bootstrapped and used customer payments to hire, build, and iterate.

The go-to-market motion leaned heavily on inbound and referrals, with roughly 75–80% of revenue coming that way. That pattern became evidence of product-market fit: customers who “brand believers” were already motivated to differentiate through brand, and they were the ones most likely to push for budget internally. Tracksuit also stayed close to users, running quarterly cohorts and meeting weekly to understand what was useful, what wasn’t, and how marketers presented results to their boards.

Leadership and culture were treated as operational systems, not slogans. Ashbold rejects the idea that teams must choose between “caring” and “high performance,” arguing instead that care drives performance. As the company expanded to new offices, it seeded locations with founders and early culture carriers from existing teams to preserve the same standards during hypergrowth.

Fundraising philosophy followed a similar integrity-first approach. Ashbold emphasizes a high “say-do ratio” in relationships and prefers accountability over promises. Tracksuit bootstrapped for two years to avoid selling “snake oil,” and the company frames VC capital as optional—used only to accelerate specific opportunities—because customers and growth already provide proof.

Finally, the operational backbone includes heavy use of Notion for strategy and decision-making. As the team grows past Dunbar’s number (around 150), communication and distilling priorities become harder, so Tracksuit revises cadences and uses structured decision frameworks to keep momentum while balancing founder-led decisions with delegation and coaching.

Cornell Notes

Tracksuit’s early growth hinged on validating brand-measurement demand through direct marketer conversations, not through advice from founders or VCs. The company formed around a timing problem: the cookie apocalypse weakened click-based attribution, while marketers still needed proof that brand spend drives business outcomes. Ashbold says early buyers committed to 12-month contracts quickly even before a fully built product, using weekly cohort feedback to shape what the tool measured and how results were presented to boards. Bootstrapping for two years provided credibility—customers paid, grew, and referred—so fundraising became optional rather than necessary. As the team scaled, culture and decision-making were systematized using Notion and a framework that routes decisions to the right level (leaf/branch/trunk/root).

Why did Tracksuit focus on brand measurement at the exact moment it did?

The company’s thesis tied together two shifts: (1) the cookie apocalypse made clicks and direct attribution an unreliable “source of truth” for marketing success, and (2) a wave back toward full-funnel marketing increased brand spending (awareness, consideration, preference). The missing piece was boardroom-level proof—marketers needed a way to connect brand metrics and sentiment to bottom-line outcomes like cost of acquisition and lifetime value.

How did Tracksuit validate demand before having a mature product?

With no product to sell, the early pitch became problem discovery: ask marketers about their pain and test whether the hypothesized solution fits. Tracksuit then converted conversations into commitments—after 68 conversations, 11 marketers signed 12-month contracts. Those payments funded building in 30 days, since the company was bootstrapped and relied on customer revenue for hiring and operations.

What role did customer feedback play after contracts were signed?

Tracksuit ran quarterly cohorts and met customers weekly to learn how they used the tool, what was useful, and what wasn’t. The company also joined board meetings to present data, learning how marketers translated brand measurement into internal budget decisions. That feedback loop shaped the product’s ability to track awareness and brand sentiment and show how changes could “trickle into” improved acquisition and lifetime value.

Why did inbound and referrals matter for product-market fit?

Ashbold reports that about 75–80% of revenue came from inbound and referrals. That concentration suggested the tool resonated with a specific buyer type—brand-focused marketers in categories where brand is a moat. Because inbound/referrals reduce control over who arrives, the company treated the pattern as evidence that the problem it solved was urgent for the right customers.

What leadership principle guided culture during hypergrowth?

Tracksuit treated “caring” and “high performance” as complementary rather than a tradeoff. The logic: caring for people increases their care for the product and for each other, which then sustains performance. During office expansions, leadership seeded new locations with founders and early culture carriers from existing teams to keep standards consistent.

How does Tracksuit structure decisions as the company grows?

Notion is used to manage strategy and decision flow. Ashbold describes a decision framework with four levels: leaf decisions can be executed without founder input; branch decisions are made by the team but reported back once decided; trunk decisions are recommended by the founder for approval; root decisions are the founder’s call with team feedback allowed. This helps balance founder mode with delegation, especially after reaching Dunbar’s number (~150), when communication and coordination require tighter cadences.

Review Questions

  1. What specific marketing measurement problem did Tracksuit target, and how did the cookie apocalypse change what “proof” looked like?
  2. How did Tracksuit turn early conversations into revenue, and why did bootstrapping strengthen credibility with both customers and potential investors?
  3. What does the leaf/branch/trunk/root decision framework accomplish, and how does it relate to scaling founder involvement?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Founders should prioritize talking to customers in the first six months, because paying buyers reveal urgency and fit faster than advice from founders or VCs.

  2. 2

    Tracksuit’s brand-measurement thesis connected two forces: weakened click attribution after the cookie apocalypse and renewed full-funnel emphasis on brand building.

  3. 3

    Early validation can come from problem-fit conversations that convert into contracts, even when the product is still minimal or white-labeled.

  4. 4

    Bootstrapping for a period can reduce the need to “convince” investors, since revenue growth and customer referrals act as proof.

  5. 5

    Weekly cohort feedback and participation in board presentations helped shape how brand metrics were translated into business outcomes.

  6. 6

    Culture at Tracksuit was treated as a system: care and performance were linked, and new offices were seeded with founders and culture carriers.

  7. 7

    As teams pass Dunbar’s number, structured communication and decision routing (using Notion and a decision framework) become essential to maintain speed and clarity.

Highlights

Tracksuit validated demand by turning 68 marketer conversations into 11 signed 12-month contracts—before building a full product.
Brand measurement became urgent because the cookie apocalypse undermined click-based attribution while marketers still needed boardroom proof of brand ROI.
Bootstrapping wasn’t just a funding choice; it was a credibility strategy that let customer love and referrals do the convincing.
Notion-backed decision routing (leaf/branch/trunk/root) was used to keep momentum while balancing founder-led decisions with delegation.
Culture was scaled by seeding new offices with founders and early culture carriers, reinforcing care as a driver of performance.

Mentioned