Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Why Obsidian is Still the Best Notes App in 2026 thumbnail

Why Obsidian is Still the Best Notes App in 2026

5 min read

Based on Linking Your Thinking with Nick Milo's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Obsidian is positioned as a notes system built around user control: notes remain plain-text Markdown files rather than being trapped in a proprietary format.

Briefing

Obsidian’s staying power in 2026 comes down to a simple promise: notes should be private, portable, and owned by the person writing them—without forcing that person into a proprietary workflow. The pitch centers on a “love letter” to Obsidian that frames it as software designed to avoid dark patterns and lock-in, using plain files and encryption so users keep control of their thinking over years, not months.

A first pillar is customization that turns a note app into a personal digital home. Instead of asking users to adapt to a rigid structure, Obsidian treats notes as basic text files that can be written, organized, and connected in whatever way fits the user’s life—lists, language learning, essays, and long-form projects that link ideas across a larger effort like a book. The emphasis is on contrast, feel, and flexibility: the workspace should look and behave like the user’s own environment, not a one-size-fits-all template.

Second, Obsidian is presented as an ownership-first alternative to apps that can become hostile when business models change. The transcript contrasts Obsidian with Evernote, describing years of accumulated notes that became hard to use after leaving Evernote in 2015—an experience tied to proprietary formatting and the pain of regaining usability. In Obsidian’s model, notes are plain-text Markdown files stored locally on a computer, not trapped inside an app’s proprietary system. The “file over app” philosophy is attributed to Obsidian’s CEO, Capano, and is summarized as a manifesto: durable digital artifacts require controllable files in easy-to-retrieve formats, plus tools that preserve user freedom.

Third, the workflow is positioned as a thinking engine rather than a filing cabinet. Obsidian’s linking feature—connecting one note to another—turns relationships between ideas into a mental map. Each link is described as a cognitive connection, helping users play with concepts that resonate and gradually build a “personal universe” of insights. The transcript claims this approach supports sustained creative output, citing personal productivity metrics such as writing hundreds of thousands of words, leading live sessions, and working on a book.

Fourth, the notes are framed as lasting a lifetime. Because the underlying format is universal and readable by many other apps, the content is portrayed as future-proof compared with apps that rely on proprietary storage. For syncing across devices, the transcript highlights end-to-end encryption, arguing that even if servers were compromised, the notes would remain protected. The overall conclusion is that Obsidian feels safe enough to grow with—because the user’s data remains theirs, the system is extensible, and the ideas can outlive any single app or platform shift.

Cornell Notes

Obsidian’s appeal in 2026 is built on four linked promises: customization, ownership, better thinking, and long-term durability. Notes are treated as plain-text Markdown files stored locally, so users keep control rather than relying on an app that could change terms, formats, or access. Linking notes is presented as more than organization—it’s a method for building connections between ideas over time, supporting creativity and insight. Finally, universal file formats and end-to-end encrypted syncing are offered as safeguards against lock-in and future platform risk. Together, these features aim to make notes a lasting extension of a person’s mind, not a temporary dependency on a single service.

Why does customization matter more than “features” in the Obsidian pitch?

Customization is framed as the difference between forcing users into an app’s workflow and letting the app match the user’s thinking. Obsidian is described as taking plain text files users already own and turning them into a flexible workspace—where lists, language practice, essays, and book-scale projects can all connect without compromising privacy or holding notes hostage. The core idea is that a lifelong digital home should feel personal and adaptable, not standardized.

What does “no one else owns your stuff” mean in practical terms?

Ownership is tied to file control. Notes are plain-text Markdown files stored locally on the user’s computer, not trapped in a proprietary system. The transcript contrasts this with Evernote, where leaving in 2015 led to years of broken formatting and painful recovery of usable notes. Obsidian’s model is presented as “file over app,” with the claim that users can access their notes without paying for access or being blocked by app-side changes.

How does linking notes change the way people think, according to the transcript?

Linking is portrayed as a cognitive tool, not just organization. Each time a note is linked to another, the user is said to create a connection in their mind—turning notes into a “bicycle for the mind.” Over time, linking one note to another is described as building a personalized universe of ideas that grows in value, helping coax out insights and support sustained creative work.

Why are universal file formats treated as a long-term advantage?

Universal formats are presented as future-proofing. Because Obsidian notes are plain text files, they can be viewed by many other apps, not only Obsidian. That reduces the risk of being stranded by a single vendor’s proprietary format. The transcript argues that most note apps don’t offer the same level of portability, making Obsidian more resilient across years and changing tools.

What role does encryption play in the “notes last a lifetime” argument?

Encryption is used to address risk during syncing. When notes sync across devices, the transcript claims the data is end-to-end encrypted, meaning others—including employees at a service provider—can’t read the contents. The argument also acknowledges “black swan” scenarios like server hacks: even if servers were compromised, the notes should remain protected because the encryption prevents exposure.

Review Questions

  1. How does treating notes as plain-text Markdown files change the user’s leverage compared with proprietary note formats?
  2. In what ways does note linking function as a thinking tool rather than a storage system?
  3. What combination of portability and encryption does the transcript use to justify long-term trust in Obsidian?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Obsidian is positioned as a notes system built around user control: notes remain plain-text Markdown files rather than being trapped in a proprietary format.

  2. 2

    Customization is presented as essential—Obsidian lets users shape a personal “digital home” instead of adapting to a fixed app workflow.

  3. 3

    The “file over app” philosophy emphasizes durable, easy-to-retrieve files so users can access their own content without app-side permission.

  4. 4

    Linking notes is framed as a cognitive practice that helps users build connections between ideas over time, supporting creativity and insight.

  5. 5

    Universal file formats are treated as future-proofing because other apps can read the notes even if Obsidian’s ecosystem changes.

  6. 6

    End-to-end encrypted syncing is highlighted as protection against unauthorized access, including in worst-case server compromise scenarios.

  7. 7

    The transcript adds that Obsidian’s community, modular plug-in system, and developer ecosystem extend the core workflow beyond basic note-taking.

Highlights

Obsidian’s core pitch is ownership: notes are plain-text Markdown files stored locally, designed to avoid lock-in and app-side hostage scenarios.
Linking notes is described as a “bicycle for the mind,” turning relationships between ideas into a growing personal map of insight.
Universal file formats plus end-to-end encrypted syncing are presented as the combination that makes notes durable across time and device changes.

Mentioned