Why Obsidian is Still the Best Notes App in 2026
Based on Linking Your Thinking with Nick Milo's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
Obsidian is positioned as a notes system built around user control: notes remain plain-text Markdown files rather than being trapped in a proprietary format.
Briefing
Obsidian’s staying power in 2026 comes down to a simple promise: notes should be private, portable, and owned by the person writing them—without forcing that person into a proprietary workflow. The pitch centers on a “love letter” to Obsidian that frames it as software designed to avoid dark patterns and lock-in, using plain files and encryption so users keep control of their thinking over years, not months.
A first pillar is customization that turns a note app into a personal digital home. Instead of asking users to adapt to a rigid structure, Obsidian treats notes as basic text files that can be written, organized, and connected in whatever way fits the user’s life—lists, language learning, essays, and long-form projects that link ideas across a larger effort like a book. The emphasis is on contrast, feel, and flexibility: the workspace should look and behave like the user’s own environment, not a one-size-fits-all template.
Second, Obsidian is presented as an ownership-first alternative to apps that can become hostile when business models change. The transcript contrasts Obsidian with Evernote, describing years of accumulated notes that became hard to use after leaving Evernote in 2015—an experience tied to proprietary formatting and the pain of regaining usability. In Obsidian’s model, notes are plain-text Markdown files stored locally on a computer, not trapped inside an app’s proprietary system. The “file over app” philosophy is attributed to Obsidian’s CEO, Capano, and is summarized as a manifesto: durable digital artifacts require controllable files in easy-to-retrieve formats, plus tools that preserve user freedom.
Third, the workflow is positioned as a thinking engine rather than a filing cabinet. Obsidian’s linking feature—connecting one note to another—turns relationships between ideas into a mental map. Each link is described as a cognitive connection, helping users play with concepts that resonate and gradually build a “personal universe” of insights. The transcript claims this approach supports sustained creative output, citing personal productivity metrics such as writing hundreds of thousands of words, leading live sessions, and working on a book.
Fourth, the notes are framed as lasting a lifetime. Because the underlying format is universal and readable by many other apps, the content is portrayed as future-proof compared with apps that rely on proprietary storage. For syncing across devices, the transcript highlights end-to-end encryption, arguing that even if servers were compromised, the notes would remain protected. The overall conclusion is that Obsidian feels safe enough to grow with—because the user’s data remains theirs, the system is extensible, and the ideas can outlive any single app or platform shift.
Cornell Notes
Obsidian’s appeal in 2026 is built on four linked promises: customization, ownership, better thinking, and long-term durability. Notes are treated as plain-text Markdown files stored locally, so users keep control rather than relying on an app that could change terms, formats, or access. Linking notes is presented as more than organization—it’s a method for building connections between ideas over time, supporting creativity and insight. Finally, universal file formats and end-to-end encrypted syncing are offered as safeguards against lock-in and future platform risk. Together, these features aim to make notes a lasting extension of a person’s mind, not a temporary dependency on a single service.
Why does customization matter more than “features” in the Obsidian pitch?
What does “no one else owns your stuff” mean in practical terms?
How does linking notes change the way people think, according to the transcript?
Why are universal file formats treated as a long-term advantage?
What role does encryption play in the “notes last a lifetime” argument?
Review Questions
- How does treating notes as plain-text Markdown files change the user’s leverage compared with proprietary note formats?
- In what ways does note linking function as a thinking tool rather than a storage system?
- What combination of portability and encryption does the transcript use to justify long-term trust in Obsidian?
Key Points
- 1
Obsidian is positioned as a notes system built around user control: notes remain plain-text Markdown files rather than being trapped in a proprietary format.
- 2
Customization is presented as essential—Obsidian lets users shape a personal “digital home” instead of adapting to a fixed app workflow.
- 3
The “file over app” philosophy emphasizes durable, easy-to-retrieve files so users can access their own content without app-side permission.
- 4
Linking notes is framed as a cognitive practice that helps users build connections between ideas over time, supporting creativity and insight.
- 5
Universal file formats are treated as future-proofing because other apps can read the notes even if Obsidian’s ecosystem changes.
- 6
End-to-end encrypted syncing is highlighted as protection against unauthorized access, including in worst-case server compromise scenarios.
- 7
The transcript adds that Obsidian’s community, modular plug-in system, and developer ecosystem extend the core workflow beyond basic note-taking.