Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
xTiles: building a second brain visually (Notion alternative) thumbnail

xTiles: building a second brain visually (Notion alternative)

Greg Wheeler·
5 min read

Based on Greg Wheeler's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

xTiles organizes work using Spaces → Projects → Pages/Collections, combining visual canvases with database-style filtering.

Briefing

xTiles positions itself as a visual “second brain” workspace that blends whiteboard-style note capture with Notion-like structure—without requiring weeks of setup. The core pitch is speed and clarity: users can start organizing on day one using a canvas of draggable tiles, while still getting projects, pages, collections, backlinks, tasks, and calendar views to keep ideas moving toward output.

At the foundation is a three-level organization model. “Spaces” sit at the top and contain “projects.” Inside each project are “pages” (documents/canvases) and “collections” (database-like groupings). Pages function like blank canvases where users can “splatter paint” thoughts, images, and content. The building blocks on those canvases are tiles—resizable note cards that can hold text, tasks, tables, images, and nested notes. Tiles support markdown headings and slash commands for quick inserts such as tasks, images, and quote snippets. Each tile can be styled individually with different layouts, colors, and icons, making the workspace feel more like a visual board than a rigid document editor.

A key differentiator is how xTiles handles relationships between notes. Backlinks let users see where a tile is referenced and jump directly to the linked tile, even on long pages. Content is also described as block-based, enabling rearrangement of lines and ideas without losing context—useful for reorganizing thinking as it evolves.

Productivity features sit alongside the note system. An inbox captures incoming material, including items saved via a browser Web Clipper. The clipper can save full pages (including YouTube videos) or snippets and highlighted text, which land in the inbox as tiles that can be dragged onto canvases. From there, tasks can be created inside notes and then tracked in a unified task sidebar. Tasks can be assigned, given due dates, scheduled onto a calendar, and surfaced through notifications. Search spans across projects, returning results with the specific project and page where matching content lives.

Collections add the database layer. Tiles can be added to collections either by copying (keeping the tile on the page) or by moving (removing it from the page). Collections support multiple views—table, gallery, board, calendar, and timeline—and allow rich properties such as relational data, multi-select fields, dates, checkboxes, numbers, and files. Filters can produce saved views, letting users slice the same stored ideas in different ways.

The “second brain” setup example ties everything together using Thiago Forte’s PARA-style concepts (projects, areas, resources, archive). One project acts as a Wall of ideas (a visual intake and staging area). A “Museum” collection then organizes those tiles into a table with tags and saved filters—such as separating photo-only views from everything else, and creating views by life area (e.g., “life of learning,” “life of creating”). A Canvas page holds active work, like a YouTube script project or a sunflower picture-study project, where selected wall ideas are pulled in, tasks are scheduled, and research notes are clipped and assembled.

The main limitation noted is that tags don’t sync globally across collections, which pushes the workflow toward using a single collection with tags to recreate PARA-style filtering. Even with that constraint, xTiles is framed as strongest for creation: visual capture plus built-in task and calendar tooling aimed at turning stored ideas into finished projects.

Cornell Notes

xTiles is presented as a visual second-brain system that combines a draggable tile canvas with structured organization like projects, pages, and database-style collections. Notes live on resizable tiles that support markdown, slash commands, nested notes, and backlinks for navigating idea networks. A Web Clipper feeds an inbox with saved pages, videos, and highlighted snippets, which can then be dragged onto canvases. Tasks and scheduling run alongside notes through a unified task list, calendar view, and notifications, while search spans projects and pages. In the PARA-inspired setup example, a “Wall” captures ideas, a “Museum” organizes them using filters and tags, and a “Canvas” holds active projects—though tags don’t sync across collections, encouraging a single-collection approach.

How does xTiles structure information so a “second brain” doesn’t become a pile of notes?

Organization runs top-down: Spaces contain Projects; Projects contain Pages and Collections. Pages are blank canvases where users place resizable tiles. Collections act like database groupings (similar to Notion databases) where tiles can be viewed and filtered in multiple formats (table, gallery, board, calendar, timeline). This separation lets users capture visually on pages while later sorting and querying content in collections.

What makes tiles more than simple sticky notes?

Tiles are resizable cards that can be styled individually (icons, layout, color) and can contain structured content: bulleted text, tasks, tables, sub-notes, images, and nested notes. They also support markdown headings and slash commands for quick inserts like tasks, images, and quote snippets. Backlinks further connect tiles by showing where a note is referenced and enabling jumps to the exact tile.

How does the Web Clipper feed the system, and what happens after clipping?

The Web Clipper can save full articles/websites (including YouTube videos) and also save snippets or highlighted text. Saved items land in the inbox as tiles with metadata like thumbnail and title. From the inbox, users drag tiles onto canvases/pages (e.g., the Wall) and can then organize them into projects or collections later.

How do tasks and scheduling integrate with note-taking in xTiles?

Tasks can be created inside notes and then appear in a centralized task sidebar. Each task can include assignment and due dates, and tasks can be scheduled onto a calendar. Notifications surface tasks due today, and clicking them takes users back to the task list. This keeps execution tied to the same workspace where ideas are stored.

What role do collections and filters play in the PARA-style “Museum” workflow?

Collections store tiles so they can be filtered and sorted. The example uses a single “Museum” table collection with tags to create multiple saved views—such as an “all” view excluding photos, a “daily photos” gallery view, and views by life area like “life of learning” and “life of creating.” Filters are saved as new views so the same underlying ideas can be reviewed from different angles.

What limitation affects how PARA-style tagging is implemented?

Tags don’t sync across collections. Because of that, the example avoids separate collections for each life area (e.g., one collection per area) and instead uses one collection (“Museum”) with tags for both note type and life area/value. That workaround enables seeing everything at once while still using filters to recreate PARA-style segmentation.

Review Questions

  1. If a tile needs to appear both on a canvas page and inside a filtered database view, which collection action would you use: add to collection (copy) or move to a collection? Why?
  2. Describe the flow from inbox capture to organized retrieval in the Wall → Museum → Canvas setup.
  3. How do backlinks change navigation compared with searching alone when working with long pages of tiles?

Key Points

  1. 1

    xTiles organizes work using Spaces → Projects → Pages/Collections, combining visual canvases with database-style filtering.

  2. 2

    Tiles are resizable, stylable note cards that support markdown headings, slash commands, nested notes, and embedded content like images and tables.

  3. 3

    Backlinks create a navigable network of notes by showing where a tile is referenced and jumping directly to the linked tile.

  4. 4

    A Web Clipper sends saved pages, videos, and highlighted snippets into an inbox as tiles that can be dragged into projects.

  5. 5

    Tasks are integrated into the same system via a unified task list, calendar scheduling, and notifications tied to due dates.

  6. 6

    Collections support multiple views (table, gallery, board, calendar, timeline) and rich properties such as relational fields and multi-select values.

  7. 7

    Because tags don’t sync across collections, a PARA-style setup may require using one collection with tags plus saved filters to replicate segmentation.

Highlights

Tiles can be resized by dragging onto the canvas, then individually styled with icons, layouts, and colors—turning note-taking into a visual arrangement.
Backlinks don’t just list references; they let users jump and scroll to the exact tile where a link points, even on long pages.
The inbox + Web Clipper workflow turns web research into draggable tiles, which then become inputs for projects and scheduled tasks.
Collections provide database-like power with multiple views and saved filters, enabling “Museum” style retrieval from a single organized store.
The biggest workflow constraint is that tags don’t sync across collections, pushing users toward a single-collection tagging strategy for PARA-style organization.

Topics

Mentioned