Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
100 Years of Relativity + Challenge Winners! thumbnail

100 Years of Relativity + Challenge Winners!

PBS Space Time·
5 min read

Based on PBS Space Time's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

A gravitational tractor can redirect Apophis by about 25,000 km using only gravitational attraction from a spacecraft hovering ~325 meters from the asteroid.

Briefing

A Newtonian “gravitational tractor” approach could plausibly shift the asteroid Apophis by 25,000 kilometers using a spacecraft that never physically collides with it—requiring only about 1,600 metric tons of spacecraft mass (including fuel) and roughly 16 metric tons of fuel over a seven-year lead time. The key insight is that the needed acceleration is tiny—about 10⁻⁹ m/s²—yet sustained long enough to produce the required positional change before Apophis reaches Earth in 2036.

The calculation starts by moving into Apophis’s 2029 orbital-velocity frame, eliminating the need to track its initial ~30 km/s motion. In that frame, the asteroid’s starting velocity is effectively zero, and the task reduces to adding enough velocity so Apophis ends up displaced by 25,000 km relative to where it would have been. The gravitational pull from the hovering spacecraft provides the acceleration. Using a basic kinematics relation (position change from average acceleration over time), the average acceleration needed over seven years comes out to roughly one ten-billionth of Earth’s surface gravity.

To translate that acceleration into required spacecraft mass, Newton’s law of universal gravitation is applied at a standoff distance of 325 meters from Apophis’s center of mass. In the force-to-acceleration step, Apophis’s mass cancels out, which is why the asteroid’s shape and internal composition don’t matter for this portion of the estimate. The resulting average spacecraft-plus-fuel mass is about 1,600 metric tons—comparable to roughly 80% of a space shuttle’s mass.

Fuel needs are then handled with the rocket equation, but with a crucial mass bookkeeping choice: because the spacecraft is effectively “pulling” the entire asteroid, Apophis’s mass dominates the system. The transcript treats the asteroid’s mass (~30 billion kg) as the “dry” mass and adds fuel to form the “wet” mass. The pulsed fusion drive’s exhaust velocity is taken as 500 km/s, but thruster geometry reduces the effective component that contributes to pulling forward. With thrusters angled about 30 degrees to avoid pushing the asteroid the wrong way (assuming a 325-meter-diameter sphere), the usable reverse component of exhaust velocity is about 427 km/s; sideways components require multi-direction pointing to cancel.

Combining these ingredients yields a fuel-to-asteroid mass ratio of about 5.3×10⁻⁷, corresponding to roughly 16 metric tons of fuel—about 1% of the spacecraft mass. That small fuel fraction is the practical payoff: with a sufficiently capable pulsed fusion drive, the gravitational tractor concept appears feasible given the seven-year warning window.

The segment closes by noting that a less advanced propulsion option could still work in principle, though it would demand far more propellant because conventional rocket exhaust velocities are under 1% of the fusion drive’s. It also announces challenge winners receiving PBS Digital Studios t-shirts and previews upcoming episodes focused on black holes and deeper relativity-era weirdness.

Cornell Notes

The gravitational tractor method could plausibly save Earth from an Apophis impact by pulling the asteroid about 25,000 km off its would-be path using only gravity. The estimate uses Newtonian mechanics in Apophis’s 2029 orbital-velocity frame, where the asteroid starts with zero velocity, and computes the tiny average acceleration needed over seven years (~10⁻⁹ m/s²). Producing that acceleration at a 325 m standoff requires about 1,600 metric tons of spacecraft mass (including fuel). Fuel demand is then computed with the rocket equation using a pulsed fusion drive exhaust velocity of 500 km/s, reduced to an effective 427 km/s due to thruster angling. The result is about 16 metric tons of fuel—around 1% of spacecraft mass—making the concept comparatively propellant-efficient.

Why does switching to Apophis’s 2029 orbital-velocity frame simplify the problem so much?

In the asteroid’s 2029 frame, Apophis’s initial velocity is treated as zero, so the calculation focuses only on the additional velocity needed to create a 25,000 km displacement relative to its original trajectory. That removes the need to carry through the asteroid’s ~30 km/s initial motion in the mechanics.

How is the required acceleration determined from the desired 25,000 km positional shift?

The method uses a one-dimensional kinematics relation linking change in position, average acceleration, and time, assuming starting velocity is zero in the Apophis frame. Over seven years, the average acceleration needed to achieve the 25,000 km relative displacement comes out to about 10⁻⁹ m/s²—roughly one ten-billionth of Earth’s surface gravity.

What mass does the spacecraft need to generate that acceleration, and why doesn’t the asteroid’s shape matter here?

At a hover distance of 325 meters from Apophis’s center of mass, Newton’s law of gravitation is used to convert the required acceleration into an average spacecraft-plus-fuel mass. In that step, Apophis’s mass cancels out, so the asteroid’s detailed shape and composition don’t affect the acceleration requirement for this estimate.

Why does the rocket equation treat Apophis’s mass as part of the spacecraft’s effective “dry mass”?

Because the system being accelerated includes the asteroid: the spacecraft’s thrust must create the change in velocity of the asteroid’s trajectory. Since Apophis’s mass (~30 billion kg) dwarfs the spacecraft mass (~1.6 million kg), the dry mass is effectively Apophis’s mass, and the wet mass is Apophis’s mass plus the fuel mass.

How do thruster angles change the effective exhaust velocity used in the fuel calculation?

The thrusters must be angled to avoid pushing the asteroid backward. Assuming Apophis is a 325-meter diameter sphere, the transcript estimates a thruster angle of about 30 degrees. Only the reverse component of the exhaust velocity contributes to the pulling effect; the sideways components are treated as unusable and require thrusters pointing in at least two directions on either side to cancel out. With a 500 km/s exhaust velocity, the effective reverse component is about 427 km/s.

What final fuel requirement emerges, and why is it considered favorable?

Using the rocket equation with the effective exhaust velocity (427 km/s) and the mass ratio setup, the fuel-to-asteroid mass ratio is about 5.3×10⁻⁷. That corresponds to roughly 16 metric tons of fuel, described as about 1% of the spacecraft mass—small enough to make the seven-year redirection look feasible if the pulsed fusion drive exists.

Review Questions

  1. What assumptions allow the calculation to ignore Apophis’s initial 30 km/s velocity and reduce the problem to a displacement in one dimension?
  2. In the Newtonian mass estimate, what cancels out, and what does that imply about sensitivity to asteroid shape and composition?
  3. How does thruster geometry (angle and cancellation of sideways components) alter the effective exhaust velocity and therefore the fuel mass via the rocket equation?

Key Points

  1. 1

    A gravitational tractor can redirect Apophis by about 25,000 km using only gravitational attraction from a spacecraft hovering ~325 meters from the asteroid.

  2. 2

    In Apophis’s 2029 orbital frame, the asteroid’s starting velocity is treated as zero, simplifying the mechanics to a one-dimensional displacement problem.

  3. 3

    Sustained over seven years, the required average acceleration is extremely small—about 10⁻⁹ m/s² (roughly one ten-billionth of Earth’s surface gravity).

  4. 4

    Producing that acceleration at 325 meters requires about 1,600 metric tons of spacecraft-plus-fuel mass, and the asteroid’s shape/composition doesn’t matter for this step because Apophis’s mass cancels in the acceleration calculation.

  5. 5

    Fuel needs are computed with the rocket equation, treating Apophis’s mass as the dominant “dry” mass because it far exceeds the spacecraft mass.

  6. 6

    Thruster angling reduces the effective exhaust velocity from 500 km/s to about 427 km/s, with sideways components requiring multi-direction thruster placement to cancel.

  7. 7

    The resulting fuel requirement is about 16 metric tons (≈1% of spacecraft mass), making the concept comparatively propellant-efficient if a pulsed fusion drive can be built.

Highlights

The required acceleration to shift Apophis by 25,000 km over seven years is only ~10⁻⁹ m/s²—tiny, but enough with time.
At a 325 m standoff, Newtonian gravity implies an average spacecraft-plus-fuel mass of ~1,600 metric tons, with asteroid shape irrelevant to the estimate.
Accounting for thruster geometry turns a 500 km/s fusion exhaust into an effective ~427 km/s reverse component, leading to ~16 metric tons of fuel.

Topics

  • General Relativity
  • Gravitational Tractor
  • Asteroid Deflection
  • Pulsed Fusion Drive
  • Rocket Equation

Mentioned