Best Research Apps | 5 Chrome Extension for Literature Review
Based on Dr Rizwana Mustafa's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
CopyLlot turns opened papers into clickable extraction targets like conclusions, limitations, abstracts, and related work.
Briefing
Five free Chrome extensions promise to streamline literature reviews by turning scattered papers, citations, and notes into searchable, customizable research collections.
The first pick is CopyLlot, positioned as a widely used tool for gathering literature. When a user opens a paper with CopyLlot, a new browser view appears that lets the extension analyze the document and surface targeted prompts—such as conclusions, limitations, abstract explanations, related work, introductions, and practical implementations. Instead of manually hunting through PDFs, users can click these suggested areas to pull out cumulative information. CopyLlot also supports full-text access, and it can work across different content types (web pages, documents, and research papers), aiming to convert reading into structured extraction.
Next comes Science Research Assistant, which focuses on making search faster and more controlled. After installing it, users can run searches directly from the Chrome toolbar. The extension supports term- and topic-based querying with configurable settings, including selecting specific platforms or journals by discipline—medicine, chemistry, agriculture, physics, math, technology, and computer science. Once journals are selected, a single command searches across those chosen outlets, opening results in separate browser views so users can quickly gather what has already been published on a topic.
A third tool, described as useful for building a personal research workflow, is a “library” style extension that supports saving searches and results. After enabling it from the toolbar, users can star searches, set preferences such as how many papers to display, where results should open, and how bibliography output should be formatted. Saved searches then populate automatically based on the user’s settings, with one-click access to related citations, site links, and “several versions” details.
For quick paper intelligence, the Lazy Scholar extension adds an at-a-glance layer of metadata. When a research paper opens, it surfaces the title, citation counts, full-text availability, related citations, journal ranking information, and comment volume. It also lets users adjust search terms by keyword, author, and year, and choose preferred full-text formats—PDF, Google forms, or Word—so users can tailor retrieval to their workflow.
Finally, Diigo Web Collector is framed as a flexible capture-and-annotate tool. Users can save an entire paper as a bookmark, download full text, or select a paragraph and apply actions such as changing highlight color, adding inputs, and writing sticky-note remarks (e.g., conclusions or personal observations). Notes can be copied, deleted, and shared with colleagues or supervisors, and the extension provides reference context for the captured information. Across all five tools, the common promise is consistency: smarter collection, faster retrieval, and easier collaboration for literature review and research organization—without paying for the extensions or limiting usage.
Cornell Notes
The core message is that literature reviews can be made faster and more structured by using Chrome extensions that capture papers, extract key sections, search across selected journals, and attach notes with shareable context. CopyLlot emphasizes guided reading and extraction of conclusions, limitations, abstracts, and related work from opened papers. Science Research Assistant streamlines topic searches by letting users choose disciplines and specific journals, then running a single command across those outlets. Lazy Scholar adds quick metadata like citation counts, journal ranking, and comment volume, while allowing format preferences for full text. Diigo Web Collector focuses on saving and annotating—highlighting text, adding sticky notes, and sharing references tied to the captured content.
How does CopyLlot reduce the effort of reading and summarizing research papers?
What makes Science Research Assistant different from a basic search workflow?
How does the “library/search saving” extension help maintain consistency across a literature review?
What kind of paper-level information does Lazy Scholar provide at a glance?
How does Diigo Web Collector support both capture and collaboration?
Review Questions
- Which extension is designed to turn an opened paper into clickable prompts for extracting conclusions, limitations, and related work?
- How does selecting specific journals in Science Research Assistant change the scope of search results compared with a general web search?
- What annotation and sharing capabilities does Diigo Web Collector provide for both entire papers and selected paragraphs?
Key Points
- 1
CopyLlot turns opened papers into clickable extraction targets like conclusions, limitations, abstracts, and related work.
- 2
Science Research Assistant speeds up literature discovery by letting users select disciplines and specific journals, then running one command across those outlets.
- 3
A library-style extension supports saving searches, starring them, and setting result and bibliography preferences for repeatable workflows.
- 4
Lazy Scholar adds quick paper intelligence—citation counts, journal ranking, related citations, and comment volume—plus format options for full text.
- 5
Diigo Web Collector enables capture at multiple levels (bookmark, full paper, paragraph selection) with highlights, sticky notes, and shareable annotations.
- 6
Using these tools together can make literature review more consistent: capture → search → extract → annotate → share.