Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
ChatGPT Prompt Engineering: The «Let`s think about this” Prompt thumbnail

ChatGPT Prompt Engineering: The «Let`s think about this” Prompt

All About AI·
4 min read

Based on All About AI's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Use a seed-word setup to anchor a habit-building passage around specific themes like productivity, small changes, and time.

Briefing

A single “Let’s think about this” prompt reliably generates multiple high-quality perspectives on habit building—turning one basic passage into examples, counterpoints, frameworks, analogies, and even economic or historical angles. The practical payoff is that the same core topic (“build better habits”) can be expanded into richer, more usable content for productivity and personal development.

The walkthrough starts by showing a baseline prompt that instructs ChatGPT to write an informational passage about building better habits, while incorporating specified “seed words” drawn from research. With the seed words set to phrases like “better habits,” “increase productivity,” “small changes reach your goals,” and “time,” the model produces a coherent guide. The example then demonstrates how a follow-up “Let’s think about this” request can generate a concrete instance: starting a daily exercise routine, reinforcing it with reminders at the same time each day, and embedding the habit into a daily routine.

From there, the prompt is used to force structured reframing. A reverse-perspective version shifts attention from building good habits to breaking bad ones—using procrastination as an example and recommending tactics like breaking large tasks into smaller chunks and assigning specific deadlines. Another variation expands the scope beyond goals and productivity, framing habit formation as lifestyle improvement and as a driver of self-efficacy and self-esteem.

The method then leans into creative and analytical transformations. Using analogies, the model compares habits to planting seeds that need the right conditions to grow, and to building a tower where daily “bricks” accumulate into something stable over time. Another prompt requests multiple angles, producing a segmented breakdown: a practical angle focused on measurable goals and planning; a psychological angle centered on mindset and limiting beliefs; a behavioral angle emphasizing identifying and replacing obstructive habits; and a holistic angle stressing supportive physical and social environments.

Further variations add evaluative dimensions. An “impact” framing yields three perspectives—productivity, health, and fulfillment—arguing that consistent effort can improve all three, even if it requires discipline. A historical standpoint positions habit formation as a long-studied idea, citing Aristotle’s discussion of ethos and character formation through consistent practice, and referencing modern habit books such as Charles Duhigg’s The Power of Habit and James Clear’s Atomic Habits. Finally, an economics lens connects personal habit choices (budgeting, saving, investing) to financial stability and connects organizational behavior to productivity and cost savings.

Overall, the core insight is that “Let’s think about this” functions as a flexible instruction for systematic reframing. Instead of rewriting from scratch, it repeatedly extracts new value from the same passage—by changing viewpoint, time horizon, metaphor, or domain—so the output becomes more actionable and more broadly applicable.

Cornell Notes

The walkthrough demonstrates a reusable “Let’s think about this” prompting technique that turns one habit-building passage into many distinct outputs. Starting from a seed-word-based informational draft, follow-up prompts generate examples, reverse strategies (breaking bad habits), and broader life framing (self-efficacy and lifestyle). Other versions add analogies, multiple angles (practical, psychological, behavioral, holistic), and impact categories (productivity, health, fulfillment). The approach scales further into historical and economic perspectives, linking habit formation to philosophy, modern habit books, and financial outcomes for individuals and organizations.

How does the prompt use “seed words” to steer the output?

The baseline setup instructs the model to write an informational passage about building better habits while explicitly including seed words in brackets. Those seed words—such as “better habits,” “increase productivity,” “small changes reach your goals,” and “time”—anchor the content so the resulting passage stays aligned with the intended themes.

What changes when the prompt is reframed from “building” to “reverse” (breaking bad habits)?

The reverse framing shifts the focus from adding good behaviors to identifying and dismantling habits that block progress. Procrastination becomes the example, and the guidance emphasizes breaking large tasks into smaller manageable chunks and setting specific deadlines for each chunk—then replacing the obstructive pattern with better habits to improve productivity and goal attainment.

Why do analogies matter in the habit-building outputs?

Analogies make the abstract process concrete. Habits are compared to planting seeds that need the right conditions to grow, and to building a tower where daily “bricks” accumulate into a stable structure over time. The contrast also highlights durability: good habits can withstand time, while weak habits crumble easily.

What does “multiple angles” produce, and how is it organized?

The “multiple angles” version segments the advice into distinct lenses: a practical angle (clear measurable goals and a plan), a psychological angle (mindset and overcoming limiting beliefs), a behavioral angle (identifying bad habits and replacing them), and a holistic angle (the right physical and social environment). This structure helps turn one topic into a checklist of different intervention points.

How do the “impact,” “historical,” and “economics” framings expand the usefulness of the same topic?

Impact framing adds outcome categories—productivity, health, and fulfillment—arguing that consistent effort yields broad life benefits. Historical framing situates habit formation as a long-running subject, referencing Aristotle’s ideas about character formation through consistent practice and modern works like Charles Duhigg’s The Power of Habit and James Clear’s Atomic Habits. Economics framing links habits to financial stability (budgeting, saving, investing) and to organizational effects like productivity gains and cost savings.

Review Questions

  1. If you had to rewrite the habit advice for someone who struggles with procrastination, which “Let’s think about this” reframing would you use and what concrete tactics should it include?
  2. Pick one angle (practical, psychological, behavioral, or holistic). What specific inputs would you provide to the prompt to make the output more tailored?
  3. How would you justify the value of analogies (seed/tower) compared with straightforward instructions when motivating habit change?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Use a seed-word setup to anchor a habit-building passage around specific themes like productivity, small changes, and time.

  2. 2

    Apply “Let’s think about this” to generate concrete examples (e.g., daily exercise) from an otherwise general guide.

  3. 3

    Reframe from “building” to “breaking” to target blockers like procrastination with chunking and deadlines.

  4. 4

    Generate richer guidance by forcing multiple lenses—practical, psychological, behavioral, and holistic—rather than one-dimensional advice.

  5. 5

    Use analogies to translate habit formation into memorable mental models (seeds needing conditions; towers built from daily bricks).

  6. 6

    Add outcome framing (productivity, health, fulfillment) to connect effort to measurable life domains.

  7. 7

    Extend the same habit topic into historical and economic contexts to broaden relevance for research and real-world decision-making.

Highlights

A single “Let’s think about this” instruction can repeatedly transform one habit passage into examples, counter-strategies, and frameworks without starting over.
Reverse-perspective prompting turns “build habits” into “break bad habits,” using procrastination as a concrete case with chunking and deadlines.
The prompt’s “multiple angles” mode outputs a structured plan across practical, psychological, behavioral, and holistic dimensions.
Historical and economics reframes connect habit formation to Aristotle and modern habit books, and to personal/organizational financial outcomes.