Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Combine papers from search & uploads in Elicit Notebooks thumbnail

Combine papers from search & uploads in Elicit Notebooks

Elicit·
4 min read

Based on Elicit's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Start with a question that searches Elicit’s database, then expand the returned paper set as needed.

Briefing

Elicit Notebooks adds a workflow for merging papers found inside Elicit with papers already in a researcher’s library or uploaded from other sources—so analysis can span multiple databases without losing context. The core move is to start with a question that searches Elicit’s large paper database, then selectively add additional papers (via PDF upload or imports like Zotero) into the same notebook workflow for side-by-side analysis.

A typical flow begins by asking a targeted question over Elicit’s database—here, a lung-cancer question about biopsy frequency among lung-cancer patients in the US. The search returns an initial set of papers (eight to start), and the researcher can keep loading more results as needed. From there, the notebook workflow supports expanding the dataset with papers outside Elicit: an “extract data from uploaded papers” step lets users select papers they’ve collected externally and bring them into the notebook’s working set. Uploads can be done via PDF, and imports can come from Zotero; selection can be broad (including selecting all papers in a folder) or narrow (choosing a few specific papers).

Once the combined set is assembled, the interface distinguishes between public Elicit papers and private uploaded papers. Users can then choose which papers matter most—whether that means focusing on a subset from the public search results, the private uploads, or a mix of both. With that curated selection, the notebook can generate a new table that becomes the basis for deeper analysis.

From the new table, Elicit Notebooks supports multiple “go deeper” actions: summarizing abstracts for the selected papers, creating structured views that help compare methods and findings, and enabling chat-style interaction with the papers themselves. The workflow also supports iterative refinement: after drilling into the most relevant papers, users can return to broader search with slightly different query framings, load additional papers, and repeat the narrowing process.

The practical payoff is a two-stage research loop—go broad by aggregating papers from Elicit’s database (described as about 125 million papers across open access and paywalled sources) plus user-collected materials from other systems, then go deep by narrowing to a high-quality subset and running analysis on that set. The notebook also allows adding columns to extract data across the selected papers, including columns based on user-defined criteria or columns that help filter papers related to a specific query. In short, the feature is designed to keep multi-source literature organized and analyzable in one place, enabling theme-finding and method comparison across both discovered and user-supplied papers.

Cornell Notes

Elicit Notebooks enables researchers to combine papers found through Elicit search with papers they upload or import from other sources, then analyze them together. A workflow starts with a question that searches Elicit’s database (about 125 million papers), returns an initial set, and can be expanded. Users can then add uploaded papers (PDFs or imports like Zotero) into the same working set, with separate visibility for public versus private papers. After selecting the most relevant papers, the notebook can create a new table, summarize abstracts, and support chat-based comparison and deeper inspection. This supports an iterative loop: broaden the corpus across sources, then narrow to a high-quality subset for focused analysis.

How does a researcher start combining Elicit search results with uploaded papers?

They begin by asking a question that runs a search over Elicit’s database, which returns an initial list of relevant papers (in the example, eight). After expanding the results if needed, they use an “extract data from uploaded papers” step to add papers collected outside Elicit—selected from uploads or imports such as Zotero—into the notebook’s working set.

What does “public vs private” mean in the notebook workflow?

After papers are combined, the notebook distinguishes between papers coming from Elicit’s public search results and papers the user has added as private uploads. The user can then select whichever papers they want to analyze—only public, only private, or a mixture—before generating downstream outputs like tables and summaries.

What is the purpose of creating a new table from selected papers?

A new table acts as a structured workspace for the chosen subset. In the example, the table is created from a mix of uploaded and public papers, and it becomes the foundation for deeper steps such as summarizing abstracts, extracting data into columns, and running comparisons across the selected set.

What “go deeper” actions are available once a subset is selected?

The notebook supports summarizing abstracts for the selected papers and enabling chat-style interaction with those papers. Users can also prompt comparisons—such as “compare and contrast these papers”—to examine differences in methodology or findings across the combined set.

How does the workflow support iterative research rather than a one-shot search?

After drilling into a curated subset, users can broaden again by running additional searches with slightly different query framings, loading more papers, and then re-selecting the most relevant ones. This creates a loop: expand the corpus across sources, then narrow and analyze repeatedly.

How can users extract structured information and filter papers?

The notebook allows adding columns to extract data across the selected papers. Users can add columns based on their own criteria and also add columns tied to a specific query to help rule out less relevant papers, then focus analysis on the remaining set.

Review Questions

  1. Describe the step-by-step process for combining Elicit search results with uploaded papers in a notebook.
  2. What are the main “go deeper” outputs available after selecting a subset of papers, and how do they help with comparison?
  3. How does the workflow balance broad literature gathering with focused analysis?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Start with a question that searches Elicit’s database, then expand the returned paper set as needed.

  2. 2

    Use “extract data from uploaded papers” to add PDFs and imports (such as Zotero) into the same notebook workflow.

  3. 3

    Treat public (Elicit search) and private (user-uploaded) papers separately so selection can be flexible.

  4. 4

    Create a new table from the selected papers to generate a structured workspace for analysis.

  5. 5

    Summarize abstracts and use chat-style prompts to compare and contrast papers in the selected set.

  6. 6

    Iterate by running additional searches with new query framings, then re-narrowing to the most relevant papers.

  7. 7

    Use added columns to extract structured data and filter papers based on query-specific criteria.

Highlights

Elicit Notebooks merges Elicit-discovered papers with user-uploaded or imported papers so analysis can span multiple sources in one place.
A single curated selection can drive multiple downstream actions: new tables, abstract summaries, and chat-based comparison.
The workflow is designed as a loop—go broad by aggregating papers, then go deep by narrowing to a focused subset for analysis.
Elicit’s database is described as about 125 million papers, enabling wide initial discovery before refinement.

Topics

Mentioned