Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
FINISHING MY BOOKđź“– | writing vlog thumbnail

FINISHING MY BOOKđź“– | writing vlog

ShaelinWrites·
5 min read

Based on ShaelinWrites's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

The completed six-part novel draft is just under 75,000 words, with only revision left.

Briefing

A six-part novel draft is finished—clocking in just under 75,000 words—and the writer is now shifting from drafting momentum to a careful, layered revision plan. The core takeaway isn’t just “the book is done,” but how the process changed: after an early struggle with crucial story “nuances” that hadn’t clicked, the draft moved into a sustained, unusually effortless flow. That shift made finishing feel both achievable and, in hindsight, faster than expected.

At the end of Part Five, the writer had only Part Six left, structured as four chapters with a clear sense of what must happen. The remaining work centered on writing pivotal scenes and sequences without padding—everything had already been simmering, so the job was to “sit down and write it.” Confidence was tempered by stress from unrelated personal issues and by the common late-draft tendency to procrastinate when the finish line feels near. Still, the plan stayed focused: keep writing daily when possible, but don’t force it when mental fatigue hits.

As the draft approached its final chapters, the writing quality dipped. Scenes began to feel “depthless,” with insight landing as superficial and the narrator’s voice losing some of its usual electric richness. The writer linked the problem to fatigue—working nearly nonstop for 18 days—and to the emotional pressure of ending a first draft. Instead of pushing through, a few days off were taken to recover creative energy. That break helped: when writing resumed, the second-to-last chapter’s quality improved noticeably, and the final chapter came together quickly enough to finish the whole book in one stretch.

The draft’s strengths are concentrated in character and relationship work, described as the best the writer has done—messy in places, as first drafts are, but compelling in how relationships developed and revealed themselves during drafting. The writer also frames “mess” as a feature of first drafts: technical murkiness and overwritten or convoluted sections are acceptable because revision can clean them up, while the real goal is to discover complexity through the act of writing.

Revision, however, will be intricate rather than structural. The writer expects changes that don’t drastically move plot pieces, but require fine-tuning emotional and narrative “weaving” across scenes—especially where the groundwork exists yet the intricacies don’t fully tie together. A specific pain point remains: the last line. Unlike past work where the final image often arrives during drafting, the ending words had to be chosen as a placeholder and later felt mediocre, even after stopping to think for minutes.

Overall, the finish is paired with a realistic post-draft workflow: let the draft rest, then read through to solidify edits. The writer plans to address early sections that may be overlong due to difficulty ending scenes when the purpose wasn’t clear, while preserving later scenes that already land well. The result is a completed first draft under 80k words—unrefined, but rich enough to justify the next phase of careful, detail-heavy revision.

Cornell Notes

The writer finishes a six-part novel draft at just under 75,000 words, leaving revision as the next major task. Early in the drafting process, crucial story nuances were hard to perceive, but once they “clicked,” writing became unusually effortless and immersive. Near the end, fatigue and the emotional weight of ending a first draft caused scenes to feel flat and under-insightful, prompting a short break that restored writing quality. The draft’s biggest win is character and relationship complexity, which developed strongly during drafting. Revision is expected to be intricate—fine-tuning emotional and narrative connections—while the main technical issues are considered manageable first-draft mess. The one notable dissatisfaction is the final line, which had to be chosen without a clear ending phrase during drafting.

What changed in the writer’s process that made drafting feel “effortless” later on?

The writer credits a breakthrough in understanding small but crucial story nuances. After experimenting with voice in the first two chapters (treated as pre-writing), the main drafting began around September. The early months were brutal, but after reaching a point where those microscopic story elements finally clicked, the rest of the draft flowed with sustained immersion—something the writer says is typical of first drafts, not revision.

Why did writing quality drop near the end, and what was done about it?

As the draft neared completion, the writer experienced fatigue and a late-draft resistance: scenes felt depthless, insight came off superficial, and the narrator’s voice lost some of its usual “electric” richness. Instead of forcing through, the writer took a few days off to recover creative energy. After the break, the second-to-last chapter’s execution improved, and the final chapter could be written without the same resistance.

How does the writer decide when to write through stress versus stepping back?

Consistency matters, but forcing daily output during a mental low can lead to underwhelming work—especially when the scenes are pivotal and the writer wants to stay immersed. The writer relaxed the “write every day” challenge when stress made writing miserable, then returned when energy returned. The break near the end was framed as necessary because the writer was close enough to finish that recovery could prevent wasted effort and preserve quality.

What strengths does the writer identify in the completed draft?

The writer is most proud of character and relationship work, calling it the best relationship complexity and character work they’ve done. They also value the draft’s ability to reveal compelling developments that weren’t fully planned. The writer accepts first-draft mess—overwritten or convoluted sections, technical murkiness—because it’s easier to fix than the deeper complexity that emerges during drafting.

What kind of revision does the writer expect to do next?

Revision is expected to be intricate rather than about major structural changes. The writer anticipates nuanced emotional and narrative “weaving” problems: the ground may be there, but the intricacies don’t fully tie together in every place. They also plan to read through to solidify edits, with particular attention to early sections that may have run long when scenes couldn’t be made to “end” effectively.

What specific ending problem remains after finishing the draft?

The writer didn’t know the final line while drafting. The last scene was known, but the final words weren’t, so a placeholder was used. That last line ended up feeling mediocre and slightly unsatisfying compared with earlier insightful lines, even after spending time trying to find a better capstone.

Review Questions

  1. What does the writer say is the difference between “effortlessness” in first drafts versus revision, and why does that matter for how they approach drafting?
  2. Which factors contributed to the late-draft decline in scene execution, and how did the writer test whether a break would help?
  3. Why does the writer treat first-draft mess as acceptable or even desirable, and what does that imply about their revision priorities?

Key Points

  1. 1

    The completed six-part novel draft is just under 75,000 words, with only revision left.

  2. 2

    A breakthrough in understanding crucial story nuances transformed drafting from struggle into sustained flow.

  3. 3

    Late-draft fatigue and resistance made scenes feel flat and less insightful, leading to a short recovery break.

  4. 4

    The writer’s strongest draft achievement is relationship and character complexity that emerged during writing, not just from planning.

  5. 5

    Revision is expected to be detail-heavy and emotionally nuanced rather than a major structural overhaul.

  6. 6

    The final line remains a weak spot because it was chosen without a clear ending phrase during drafting, leaving the ending slightly underwhelming.

  7. 7

    The writer plans to rest the draft briefly, then read through to identify what needs intricate fixing—especially early scenes that ran long when endings wouldn’t land.

Highlights

After early months of brutal drafting, the writer says the story “clicked” at the level of crucial, hard-to-perceive nuances—then the draft became unusually effortless.
Near the end, scenes started feeling depthless and the narrator’s voice lost its usual richness; a few days off restored quality enough to finish.
The draft’s biggest win is relationship work: characters’ dynamics developed compellingly on the page, even when it wasn’t fully planned.
The ending is known in terms of the final scene, but the last line wasn’t—forcing a placeholder that now needs revision.

Topics

  • Finishing a Novel
  • Drafting Flow
  • Late-Draft Fatigue
  • Revision Planning
  • Character Relationships