Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Gemini Pro + LangChain - Chains, Mini RAG, PAL + Multimodal thumbnail

Gemini Pro + LangChain - Chains, Mini RAG, PAL + Multimodal

Sam Witteveen·
5 min read

Based on Sam Witteveen's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Use ChatGoogleGenerativeAI with a Gemini Pro model configuration to build LangChain chains without changing the overall prompt→model→parse composition pattern.

Briefing

Gemini Pro becomes a practical building block inside LangChain, enabling everything from simple prompt-to-response chains to mini RAG, PAL (program-aided language model) math, and multimodal image Q&A. The core takeaway is that the same LangChain workflow—define a Gemini-backed LLM, wire prompts and output parsing, then compose with retrievers or tool-like steps—scales across multiple task types without changing the overall architecture.

After setting up access through Google AI Studio (API key stored in Colab secrets), the walkthrough contrasts direct Gemini Pro API calls with the LangChain equivalent. In LangChain, the key move is swapping in the Gemini chat model wrapper (ChatGoogleGenerativeAI) and then invoking it with a prompt. Responses come back in structured markdown-like formatting and can stream in multiple chunks, but the developer-facing pattern stays straightforward: prompt in, model output out.

From there, a basic “joke chain” demonstrates LangChain’s composability. A chat prompt template (“tell me a joke about {topic}”) feeds into the Gemini Pro model with a temperature setting (0.7). An output parser converts the model’s response into a plain string, and the chain is assembled using LangChain Expression Language piping—prompt → model → parser. The example confirms the chain reliably produces jokes for different topics, even if the humor quality varies.

The next step is a mini RAG system built entirely in memory. Instead of persisting a vector store, the setup embeds a small set of “mini documents” using Google’s embeddings model (embedding-001). A retriever performs similarity search over these embedded snippets, returning the most relevant context for a query. A prompt instructs the model to answer only using the retrieved context, then the pipeline passes context and question through the prompt, into Gemini Pro, and finally through an output parser. The examples show retrieval working as intended: asking “What is Gemini pro?” surfaces the snippet mentioning Gemini Pro, and asking “Who made Gemini pro?” yields “Google DeepMind.” The prompt is also tweaked to force different output formats—full sentences, JSON dictionaries, or answers wrapped in custom formatting like triple backticks.

PAL chain performance is used to highlight Gemini Pro’s ability to follow instruction patterns that turn natural language into executable logic. Using a classic word problem (“The cafeteria had 23 apples…”) the PAL chain converts the question into a Python function representing the arithmetic, runs it, and returns the correct result (9). A second timing problem (“wake up at 7:00 AM…”) produces an answer expressed as 8.5, interpreted as 8:30—presented as a “better than many” outcome compared with models that might return nonsensical values or fail outright.

Finally, multimodal support is demonstrated by switching to Gemini Pro Vision and passing an image via URL. The example uses an Earth-from-space image and asks what’s in the image and who lives there; the model responds with visible details (clouds, land, water) and a population estimate. The transcript notes multiple ways to supply images—public URLs, local paths, Google Cloud Storage bucket URLs, or base64-encoded images—setting up the path toward multimodal RAG where images can be retrieved and queried.

Overall, the workflow shows how Gemini Pro + LangChain can be assembled into reusable chains that handle text generation, retrieval-augmented answering, tool-like computation via PAL, and image-based question answering—using consistent composition patterns across tasks.

Cornell Notes

Gemini Pro can be integrated into LangChain by using ChatGoogleGenerativeAI with a Google AI Studio API key, then composing prompts, model calls, and output parsing into reusable chains. A mini RAG example embeds a small set of documents with Google’s embeddings model (embedding-001), retrieves the most relevant context in memory, and asks Gemini Pro to answer strictly from that context. The same chain pattern is adapted to control output format, including full sentences and JSON. PAL chain tests show Gemini Pro can convert word problems into Python-like logic and compute results (e.g., 23 apples → 9). Multimodal capability is added by switching to Gemini Pro Vision and sending an image URL for Q&A about what’s shown and who lives there.

How does LangChain replace a direct Gemini Pro API call in this workflow?

The setup defines an LLM using LangChain’s ChatGoogleGenerativeAI wrapper configured to use Gemini Pro. Instead of manually calling the raw API with a prompt, the chain passes a prompt template into the Gemini chat model, then routes the model output through an output parser (often converting it to a string). The transcript emphasizes that this is essentially a “key replacement” pattern: prompt → ChatGoogleGenerativeAI (Gemini Pro) → parser.

What makes the mini RAG example “mini,” and how does retrieval work without a vector database?

It stays small and in-memory: the documents are embedded and stored in a lightweight array-backed vector store rather than persisted to disk. The retriever uses similarity search over embeddings produced by Google’s embeddings model (embedding-001). When a question arrives, the retriever selects the most relevant embedded snippet(s), which are then injected into a prompt that instructs Gemini Pro to answer only based on the provided context.

How do prompt changes affect the output format in the RAG chain?

The transcript demonstrates prompt-level control. The base prompt asks for an answer based only on retrieved context. Then it’s modified to request a full sentence, or to “return your answer as JSON,” producing a JSON-like dictionary with an answer field. It also shows formatting control by asking for the answer inside triple backticks, yielding output wrapped with ``` delimiters.

What does the PAL chain do, and why do the cafeteria and wake-up examples matter?

PAL (program-aided language model) turns the natural-language question into a Python function representing the computation, runs it, and returns the result. The cafeteria problem (“23 apples… minus 20 plus six”) becomes arithmetic and returns 9. The wake-up timing problem (“7:00 AM… 1 hour 30 minutes…”) yields 8.5, interpreted as 8:30—presented as a sign PAL-style reasoning can outperform models that might return an incorrect or random value.

How is multimodal Q&A enabled, and what image input methods are mentioned?

Multimodal Q&A requires using Gemini Pro Vision rather than the text-only model. The example passes an image via a URL, and the model answers questions about the image content (Earth from space, clouds/land/water) and who lives there. The transcript lists multiple input options: public URL, local URL/path, Google Cloud Storage bucket URL, or base64-encoded image data.

Review Questions

  1. In the mini RAG setup, what role do embeddings (embedding-001) and the retriever play before Gemini Pro generates an answer?
  2. How does changing the prompt in the RAG chain alter the response format (e.g., full sentence vs JSON vs triple backticks)?
  3. What transformation does a PAL chain perform on a word problem, and how did the cafeteria example demonstrate it?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Use ChatGoogleGenerativeAI with a Gemini Pro model configuration to build LangChain chains without changing the overall prompt→model→parse composition pattern.

  2. 2

    Store the Google AI Studio API key in environment/secrets (e.g., Colab secrets) and pass it into the LangChain Google generative AI package for authentication.

  3. 3

    Build simple chains by piping a prompt template into Gemini Pro and then converting output with an output parser.

  4. 4

    Implement mini RAG by embedding small document snippets with embedding-001, retrieving the most relevant context in memory, and instructing the model to answer only from that context.

  5. 5

    Control response structure by adjusting the prompt (full sentence, JSON dictionary, or custom formatting like triple backticks).

  6. 6

    Use PAL chains to convert word problems into executable Python-like logic and return computed results (demonstrated with the 23-apples arithmetic).

  7. 7

    Enable multimodal Q&A by switching to Gemini Pro Vision and supplying images via URL, local path, Google Cloud Storage, or base64-encoded data.

Highlights

LangChain composition stays consistent across tasks: prompt templates feed Gemini models, and output parsers normalize responses.
The mini RAG example avoids persistence by using an in-memory vector store, yet still retrieves the most relevant snippet before answering.
PAL chain math works by translating word problems into Python functions and executing them—yielding correct arithmetic in the cafeteria example.
Multimodal Q&A hinges on using Gemini Pro Vision and providing an image (commonly via URL) for content-based questions.

Topics

Mentioned