Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
I'm obsessed with this book about a queer mountain lion + small press books | recent reads 64 thumbnail

I'm obsessed with this book about a queer mountain lion + small press books | recent reads 64

ShaelinWrites·
6 min read

Based on ShaelinWrites's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

“Open Throat” uses a punctuation-free, fragmented style to make a mountain lion’s thoughts feel instinctive, while treating queerness as non-human and “in nature.”

Briefing

A queer mountain lion narrates “Open Throat” in blunt, punctuation-free fragments—an animal voice that feels uncannily accurate even as it flirts with the question of whether hunger justifies killing. Henry Hul’s Los Angeles predator lives behind the Hollywood sign, mulling early on whether to eat a person, and the book’s fragmented form (no capitalization, no punctuation except “I”) turns thought into something like instinct. The narrator’s “English” is whimsical but not random: he overhears hikers and sometimes misunderstands, creating a lovable, unsettling intelligence. The review also highlights how the novel treats queerness as something primal and non-human—less about projecting human identity onto an animal and more about asking what queerness might mean “in nature.” In the second half, the plot shifts in a way that demands more suspension of disbelief, but the ending lands with clarity and illumination, making it a standout read of the year.

The rest of the recent-read list leans toward genre-bending small-press work, with mixed results on execution. “The Hounding” by Zenob Pervvis borrows the gothic, rumor-driven machinery of “The Virgin Suicides,” set in an 18th-century English countryside where five Mansfield sisters are rumored to be turning into dogs. The atmosphere is moody and grotesque, but the conflict often cycles through the same sightings and gossip without meaningful escalation. The rotating, mostly male perspectives are interesting on paper, yet the reviewer finds the individual narrators less distinct—and therefore less haunting—than the collective witness structure that made “The Virgin Suicides” so famous.

Alisa Levy’s “All I Know,” translated by Christina Mcweeny, is folk horror in a fableistic forest town where people who enter don’t return, while dogs do. The protagonist’s gut-burning unease and a town-wide “end of the world festival” build toward an apocalyptic question—whether she will leave—but the sustained monologue format keeps the festival and dread feeling more like background than driving urgency. The voice is charming and the meandering storytelling has its own closeness, yet the reviewer feels the structure blunts sharpness and incisiveness, leaving uncertainty about the ending.

Olivia Tapiro’s “Photoaxis,” translated by Kit Schlutoter, is described as bizarro and politically alert: a city overflowing with meat, a museum bombing, a piano player obsessed with snuff films, and a missing political organizer. The book’s mosaic structure and surreal, image-heavy sections read like flash fiction fragments, and the reviewer praises its experimental, philosophical approach to dystopia as a political reality rather than a speculative genre exercise. “Antiquity” by Hannah Johansson, translated by Kira Joff, is called a sapphic “Lolita,” following a journalist’s obsession with artist Helena and her teenage daughter Olga on a Greek island. The reviewer is especially struck by the novel’s memory-centered, vignette structure and by how it makes grooming feel “truthful” through the narrator’s self-serving obscuring—disturbing not because the book preaches, but because it shows how moral choices get romanticized in recollection.

Other picks broaden the range: “Bard Skull” by Martin Shaw is an intentionally confusing, myth-cacophony quest that can be read deeply or simply allowed to crash over the reader; “Her first Palestinian” by Saïd TV is grounded realist short fiction shaped by compression and careful word choice; Jacqueline Zong Lee Ross’s “The Longest Way to Eat a Melon” uses playful list formats to interrogate art-making under late-stage capitalism; and Maggie Nelson’s “Luettes” is a compact, mosaic lyric essay on the color blue that braids philosophy, architecture, research, and personal love.

The list ends with a more skeptical note on Nikki Gonzalez’s horror novel “Dualer,” where mood and atmosphere sometimes land but pacing, character depth, and payoff feel underwhelming. Overall, the strongest through-line is a preference for experimental form—fragmentation, mosaics, vignettes, and lyric essays—especially when it sharpens voice and theme rather than merely decorating the page.

Cornell Notes

Henry Hul’s “Open Throat” is the standout: a queer mountain lion narrates in fragmented, punctuation-free language that feels instinctive and endearing, while the story treats queerness as something non-human and “in nature.” The reviewer then tests similar genre experiments across small-press work—praising atmosphere and style in “The Hounding,” “All I Know,” and “Photoaxis,” but criticizing where plot escalation or narrative urgency doesn’t match the concept. “Antiquity” earns high marks for its vignette structure, fluid recollection, and a disturbing honesty about grooming through self-obscuring memory rather than moralizing. Across the list, mosaic and lyric forms (from Saïd TV’s realism to Maggie Nelson’s “Luettes”) are repeatedly valued for how they concentrate theme, voice, and emotional pressure.

Why does “Open Throat” feel unusually convincing as an animal narrative?

The mountain lion’s inner life is rendered in chopped, direct fragments with no punctuation and minimal capitalization, creating a rhythm the reviewer reads as “how a mountain lion thinks.” The narrator’s “English” comes from overhearing hikers, which keeps the whimsical premise tethered to plausible inputs. The result is a voice that’s blunt and predatory—yet also endearing—because it treats hunger and predation as nature rather than as a human moral problem.

What’s the core complaint about “The Hounding” despite its strong gothic atmosphere?

The atmosphere is praised as moody and grotesque, but the plot conflict doesn’t develop much beyond repeated rumor cycles: characters keep saying they’ve heard or seen the Mansfield girls possibly turning into dogs. The reviewer argues that the rotating witness perspectives lack the distinctiveness and haunting power that “The Virgin Suicides” achieved through its collective witness structure.

How does the monologue form affect “All I Know”?

The book’s sustained monologue makes the protagonist’s life and relationships feel charming and close, but it also pushes the end-of-world festival and the protagonist’s burning unease into the background. The reviewer describes the result as meandering and less urgent, with a “bloatedness” and loss of sharp mood—so the form becomes potentially detrimental to the story’s most compelling premises.

What makes “Photoaxis” feel politically different from many dystopian novels?

Instead of treating dystopia as speculative genre play, it’s framed as politically cognizant and suspiciously aligned with rising fascism. The reviewer highlights its surreal, mosaic structure—sections that feel like flash-fiction fragments—and its refusal to sensationalize, aiming for experimental, philosophical dismantling of the world and reconstruction toward (or beyond) collapse. Beautiful photographs at the end add a final aesthetic layer.

Why does “Antiquity” stand out as a “sapphic Lolita” without relying on overt moral instruction?

The reviewer praises the narrator’s memory-centered, vignette-based voice and its “willful obscuring” of actions. Rather than having the book spell out that grooming is wrong, the interest comes from how the character romanticizes and softens her own recollections for motivated purposes. That self-serving distortion is presented as the disturbing mechanism, making the character study feel honest and searing.

How do form and compression drive the appreciation of “Her first Palestinian” and “Luettes”?

In Saïd TV’s short-story collection, the reviewer credits compression and precision—down to word choice—while noting that the author’s talk clarified how the final published story can be shaped from a summarized submission. In Maggie Nelson’s “Luettes,” the reviewer emphasizes a mosaic/lyric-essay structure of 240 tiny numbered sections (“crops”), which makes the research and personal threads feel compact, methodical, and punchy, rewarding slow reading.

Review Questions

  1. Which narrative techniques in “Open Throat” (fragmentation, punctuation rules, overheard language) most directly create the sense of an animal mind—and where does the reviewer think disbelief becomes harder later?
  2. Compare the role of witness structure in “The Hounding” versus “The Virgin Suicides” as described here. What does the reviewer think is missing?
  3. What does the reviewer suggest about how form (monologue in “All I Know,” mosaic in “Luettes,” vignettes in “Antiquity”) can either sharpen or blunt thematic urgency?

Key Points

  1. 1

    “Open Throat” uses a punctuation-free, fragmented style to make a mountain lion’s thoughts feel instinctive, while treating queerness as non-human and “in nature.”

  2. 2

    “The Hounding” delivers strong gothic atmosphere but underdelivers on plot escalation, with conflict largely repeating rumor rather than producing new complications.

  3. 3

    “All I Know” builds folk-horror dread through gut-burning unease and an end-of-world festival, yet the sustained monologue format keeps the apocalypse feeling more like background than pressure.

  4. 4

    “Photoaxis” is praised for its surreal mosaic structure and for treating dystopia as politically grounded rather than genre-speculative, with fascism and its “counterparts” in view.

  5. 5

    “Antiquity” is valued for its memory-driven vignette structure and for portraying grooming through self-obscuring recollection rather than explicit moral lecturing.

  6. 6

    “Bard Skull” can be approached either through deep myth research or as an intentionally confusing crash of folklore and voice, depending on how much time the reader invests.

  7. 7

    “Dualer” is criticized for pacing and payoff: too much time before the main setting arrives, characters that don’t feel compelling, and a conclusion that doesn’t deliver strong suspense.

Highlights

Henry Hul’s “Open Throat” turns predatory hunger into a lovable, shocking voice by stripping punctuation and capitalization, making thought read like instinct.
“The Hounding” nails gothic tension but stalls on plot development, largely replaying sightings and gossip without meaningful escalation.
“Photoaxis” uses a mosaic of surreal, image-heavy fragments to treat dystopia as a political condition—especially around the rise of fascism.
“Antiquity” makes its most disturbing point through memory: the narrator’s self-serving recollection softens wrongdoing, and that distortion is the horror.
Maggie Nelson’s “Luettes” is built from 240 tiny numbered “crops,” creating a compact, methodical mosaic that braids research with personal love and philosophy.

Topics

  • Queer Mountain Lion
  • Gothic Rumor
  • Folk Horror
  • Small Press Fiction
  • Mosaic Narrative
  • Lyric Essay
  • Dystopian Politics

Mentioned

  • Henry Hul
  • Zenob Pervvis
  • Alisa Levy
  • Christina Mcweeny
  • Olivia Tapiro
  • Kit Schlutoter
  • Hannah Johansson
  • Kira Joff
  • Martin Shaw
  • Saïd TV
  • Jacqueline Zong Lee Ross
  • Maggie Nelson
  • Nikki Gonzalez
  • Billy Ray Bellcourt
  • Emily Jungman Jun
  • Chimwe Uni
  • Denz Smith
  • Hannah Green
  • Olivia Japro
  • ShaelinWrites
  • Nikki Gonzalez