Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Lessons from Finishing a Book (from almost giving up to thriving) thumbnail

Lessons from Finishing a Book (from almost giving up to thriving)

ShaelinWrites·
5 min read

Based on ShaelinWrites's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

The hardest drafting phase centered on arc two of a six-arc structure, where relationships needed to energize each other to create plot momentum.

Briefing

A novel draft that stalled for months ultimately turned into a fast, “effortless” write once momentum finally clicked—after a brutal stretch where the problem wasn’t writer burnout so much as the book’s internal mechanics. The core lesson is practical: when scenes won’t move and relationships won’t “ping-pong,” keep writing long enough to force momentum into existence, then revise what’s broken later.

The project began with a strong creative pull in May 2021, while work on a previous novel (“Holding a Ghost”) was still underway. The author felt the new story—initially nicknamed “Sulfur is” and later likely to be retitled—captured her current style and interests in a way that earlier work had foreshadowed. After finishing “Holding a Ghost” in summer 2021, burnout hit hard, delaying full drafting. Editing dominated most of 2022, and the first real drafting push started in late August 2022, with two preliminary chapters already written (about 8,000 words total). The main character, Rowan, also evolved from earlier conceptions: at first closer to “Sybil” from “Honey Vinegar,” then shifting into a distinct voice that made the character fun to write.

Drafting quickly revealed a mismatch between excitement and execution. Although the author loved drafting in past projects—especially the early “magic” of discovering new story elements scene by scene—this time the work felt like “pulling teeth.” Scenes didn’t land on the line level, and the plot wouldn’t cohere. The struggle wasn’t easy to diagnose; it seemed to come from subtle character and relationship dynamics that refused to energize one another.

The book’s structure relied on a six-arc framework, and the author pinpointed the second arc as the main bottleneck: it’s where relationships start moving, particularly the central bond between Rowan and her sister-in-law, Susanna. Around that core relationship sat a web of other ties—Susanna’s dad, Susanna’s half-brother (mostly off-page), Rowan’s best friend Meredith, Rowan’s parents, and another character, Raymond—roughly seven to eight relationships that needed to interact to create forward motion.

By early November 2022, the author tried a “Nanowrimo” version: writing every day without word-count pressure, with a built-in test—if daily writing didn’t fix the draft by the end of November, the book would be set aside for later. The first week was miserable. Then, around the middle of the month, a small scene kick-started a causal chain where relationships began affecting each other. From that point, the draft became shockingly smooth, and the remainder of November produced strong momentum.

After a December break and a late-February restart following health issues, the author aimed to finish by the end of May. A trip to Europe (Portugal) accelerated the urgency, leading to writing every day for the remaining sections. The final push produced unusually high output—one day topping 5,000 words—and the author finished the draft quickly, with only part two still disliked. The takeaway is twofold: keep trying through the hard phase because tiny realizations can unlock the whole draft, and commit to making the book work—especially when the “problem” appears to be the draft itself rather than the writer’s capacity to write.

Cornell Notes

The draft stalled for months because relationships and scenes wouldn’t generate momentum, especially within the second arc of a six-arc structure. After a miserable start, a daily-writing “Nanowrimo” approach forced progress until a small scene created a causal chain—then writing became unexpectedly easy. The author credits the shift to subtle character/relationship mechanics finally clicking, not to improved inspiration or reduced effort. The process ended with a strong first draft and only one major section (part two) left to revise, reinforcing that early struggle can be temporary and fixable.

Why did the early drafting feel so hard even though the author loved the idea and the character voice?

The author could write preliminary chapters and felt enamored with Rowan’s voice, but once full drafting began the scenes didn’t work on the line level and the plot wouldn’t come together. The difficulty wasn’t clearly one big flaw; it was a cluster of microscopic issues that, in combination, prevented movement. The author also struggled to connect to the draft the way she had during earlier projects, where each new scene revealed fresh story elements.

What specific structural problem made momentum hardest to create?

The author uses a six-arc structure and identified arc two as the bottleneck—the section where relationships start moving. The central relationship Rowan has with her sister-in-law Susanna needed to energize the rest of the relationship web. But the surrounding ties—Susanna’s dad, Susanna’s half-brother (mostly off-page), Rowan’s best friend Meredith, Rowan’s parents, and Raymond—weren’t “ping-ponging” off each other, so forward motion never caught.

What was the “Nanowrimo” strategy, and how did it function as a decision tool?

Instead of word-count targets, the author wrote every day. The plan included a checkpoint: if daily writing didn’t make the book work by the end of November, that would signal something fundamentally wrong and the draft should be set aside for later. The author also believed that daily writing would eventually manufacture momentum, because avoiding the problem wasn’t an option.

What changed once the daily writing plan started working?

The first week was brutal and the writing still felt bad. Then, around roughly day 11, a small scene kick-started a chain of cause and effect. After that, the relationships began impacting one another, and the rest of the draft became “shockingly effortless,” with the author describing the remainder of November as exciting and productive.

How did the author handle interruptions after momentum arrived?

After finishing most of November, the author took December off due to deadlines and other obligations. In January, another short-notice writing project delayed returning. By late February, health issues had eased enough to restart, and the author spent early March rebuilding focus. Later, a Europe trip (Portugal) created urgency, leading to writing every day to finish the remaining parts quickly.

What does the author say the real takeaway was about the source of the problem?

The author argues the problem wasn’t personal burnout or lack of ability. The draft’s mechanics were the issue—so the solution was commitment: keep working on the book to force momentum. The author contrasts this with the temptation to take a break when immersion fails, saying that in this case the book needed sustained effort until it started working.

Review Questions

  1. Which relationship web elements had to interact for arc two to “move,” and why did that matter for Rowan and Susanna?
  2. What decision rule did the author use during daily-writing “Nanowrimo,” and what happened when the rule’s deadline approached?
  3. How did the author distinguish between a problem with the writer versus a problem with the book?

Key Points

  1. 1

    The hardest drafting phase centered on arc two of a six-arc structure, where relationships needed to energize each other to create plot momentum.

  2. 2

    A web of roughly seven to eight relationships (including Rowan–Susanna, Meredith, parents, and Raymond) had to “ping-pong” for scenes to start working.

  3. 3

    When momentum vanished, daily writing without word-count pressure served as both a momentum-forcing tactic and a diagnostic checkpoint.

  4. 4

    A small scene around the middle of November triggered a causal chain, after which the draft became dramatically easier to write.

  5. 5

    Breaks and interruptions (December off, January delays, late-February health issues) didn’t permanently derail progress once the momentum mechanism clicked.

  6. 6

    The author’s main takeaway is to keep trying through early struggle and to commit to making the book work when the draft—not the writer—is the bottleneck.

Highlights

The draft became “shockingly effortless” only after a small scene kick-started a chain reaction among relationships.
Arc two was the momentum choke point: without Rowan and Susanna’s relationship pulling the rest forward, scenes wouldn’t cohere.
Daily writing without word-count targets functioned as a practical test: if it didn’t fix the book by month’s end, the draft would be set aside.
The author finished the remaining sections quickly after a Portugal trip by writing every day and leaning into the renewed momentum.
Only part two remained disliked; the author treated it as an editing problem rather than proof the whole draft was failing.

Topics

  • Drafting Momentum
  • Six-Arc Structure
  • Relationship Webs
  • Nanowrimo Strategy
  • Revision Planning