Obsidian Dataview, building a second brain, and more about me // Q&A Livestream
Based on Nicole van der Hoeven's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
She processes captured notes daily (often around 9:00 p.m.) to avoid a weekly backlog, and she treats capturing highlights as the first step even if inboxes aren’t fully cleared.
Briefing
A steady note-taking routine and a “second brain” built for active learning—not just storage—anchors Nicole van der Hoeven’s Obsidian workflow, with Dataview powering practical retrieval for meetings, people, and tabletop RPG worlds. Hitting over 1,000 subscribers prompted a Q&A livestream that quickly turned into a tour of how she turns scattered inputs into searchable knowledge, while keeping the system realistic enough to maintain.
Her approach starts with cadence. She processes notes daily rather than waiting for a weekly catch-up, choosing a time when she’s alert—around 9:00 p.m.—and less likely to be interrupted. The goal isn’t perfection; even if an inbox of captured items grows (she mentioned having 100+ unprocessed tags), the key is continuing to capture highlights and maintaining the habit of regular processing. For her, note-taking spans work and personal life without a hard boundary: meetings, calls, and even conversations with people she cares about become raw material for later review.
When asked how much time she spends, she estimates roughly one to two hours per day across the whole pipeline—highlighting, capturing, and processing. That time is distributed across contexts: notes from reading, notes from meetings, and notes created while talking to others. The system is designed to prevent backlog from becoming unmanageable.
For organization, she relies heavily on Obsidian “maps of content” (MOCs): parent pages that act as hubs for a topic, linking to related notes beneath them. She’s intentionally not strict about rigid methodologies—she creates pages when they feel useful and lets the network grow. In her D&D-oriented vault, this structure supports both rule research and worldbuilding, with metadata and templates feeding the rest of the system.
Dataview is the engine that makes those notes dynamic. She tags meeting notes with company and includes attendees, then links people to the meetings they attended so a person’s page can automatically list relevant past interactions. For tabletop RPGs, she uses Dataview to pull NPCs and factions by location, producing tables that update automatically as new notes are added—so she doesn’t have to manually maintain lists when players meet someone new.
She also addresses how she handles “fleeting notes” (single-line ideas) by logging them in Obsidian’s Daily Note plugin, treating it like a lightweight journal and later searching by tags or names. Tagging itself is selective: she mainly uses tags for checklists and feedback (including nested tags), while avoiding the mess that can come from overusing hashtags.
Beyond Obsidian, the Q&A widens into her broader productivity philosophy: she uses OKRs for goal-setting with daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, and yearly review intervals, and she treats tasks like meetings by calendar-blocking through Reclaim. She also compares Obsidian to Notion, arguing that Obsidian’s flexibility (themes and CSS) and her ability to migrate away from Notion’s content calendar—using Fantasy Calendar—made the switch stick.
The livestream ends with personal context and travel stories, but the through-line remains consistent: tools matter, yet the real leverage comes from routines that keep information moving from capture to processing to retrieval, with learning as the purpose of the “second brain.”
Cornell Notes
Nicole van der Hoeven’s Obsidian setup emphasizes a daily routine that keeps note capture from turning into an unmanageable backlog. She processes notes every day (often around 9:00 p.m.) and treats capturing highlights as the first step even when inboxes aren’t fully cleared. Organization relies on “maps of content” (MOCs) as topic hubs, while Dataview turns notes into living indexes—especially for meetings (attendees → meeting lists) and tabletop RPG content (NPCs/factions pulled by location). Fleeting one-line ideas go into Daily Notes, and tagging is used selectively for checklists and feedback rather than as a universal taxonomy. The payoff is a system that supports active learning and retrieval, not just storage.
How does she prevent note-taking from becoming a weekly backlog problem?
What’s her rule of thumb for how much time note-taking takes?
What is a “map of content” (MOC) in her workflow, and how strict is she about it?
How does Dataview help her retrieve information automatically—especially for people and meetings?
How does she use Dataview for tabletop RPG notes without constant manual maintenance?
Where do “fleeting notes” go when they’re only one line?
Review Questions
- What daily routine does she use to keep note processing from piling up, and why does she choose that timing?
- Explain how Dataview queries connect meeting notes to attendee pages in her system.
- In her workflow, when would a one-line idea become a Daily Note entry versus a new standalone note?
Key Points
- 1
She processes captured notes daily (often around 9:00 p.m.) to avoid a weekly backlog, and she treats capturing highlights as the first step even if inboxes aren’t fully cleared.
- 2
Her note-taking time averages about one to two hours per day across capture and processing, including notes taken during calls and conversations.
- 3
“Maps of content” (MOCs) act as topic hubs that link to related notes; she stays flexible rather than following strict MOC sizing rules.
- 4
Dataview is used to create automatic indexes—attendees pull up their meeting history, and RPG NPC/faction tables update based on metadata and folder paths.
- 5
Single-line “fleeting notes” go into Daily Notes using Obsidian’s Daily Note core plugin, often with tags for later search.
- 6
Tagging is selective: she mainly uses it for checklists and feedback (including nested tags) rather than building a universal taxonomy.
- 7
For goals and consistency, she uses OKRs with scheduled review intervals and calendar-blocking via Reclaim to treat tasks like meetings.