Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Recent Reads #37 | Internet novels & plotless beauty thumbnail

Recent Reads #37 | Internet novels & plotless beauty

ShaelinWrites·
6 min read

Based on ShaelinWrites's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Ratings are treated as personal measures of enjoyment and subjective craft, not as judgments of a book’s universal artistic value.

Briefing

Book ratings in this “Recent Reads” episode come with a clear philosophy: enjoyment and craft assessments are treated as personal, not as a verdict on a book’s inherent worth. That framing sets up a run of sharply opinionated reactions—ranging from lyrical refugee fiction to internet-satire form experiments—where the value of each novel is measured less by universal “goodness” and more by how it landed emotionally and artistically.

The first major standout is “What Strange Paradise” by Amar El Akkad, structured across two timelines and two young lives: Vonna, a teen on a tourist island, and Ammar, a Syrian refugee boy whose ship survives a storm and who washes ashore. The praise centers on prose that feels both evocative and hyper-real about war, plus characters that operate like embodiments of ideas without turning into cardboard. The novel’s blend of lyrical impressionism with stark realism is explicitly compared to Mohsin Hamid’s “Exit West,” not because the themes match, but because the stylistic balance does.

Shelley Parker-Chan’s “She Who Became the Sun” shifts the focus to 14th-century China and a peasant girl, You, who inherits her dead brother’s identity and fate by joining a monastery. The strongest moments are internal: You’s interiority and emotional conflict. The book weakens, in this reader’s view, when the narrative leans harder into external action and war, pulling attention away from the character’s inner development. There’s also a wish for more romance development—especially given the novel’s disguised-identity, gendered tension setup.

Ali Smith’s “Summer,” the final installment of the “Seasons Quartet,” is described as airy and philosophically bright, with the series’ habit of rooting itself in current events—this time including references to the 2020 pandemic. Still, it lands as the weakest of the quartet for two reasons: the interpersonal situation is least compelling, and the writing is less experimental than earlier books. The ranking that follows—“Winter” first, then “Autumn,” then “Spring,” then “Summer”—signals where the series’ formal play felt most alive.

Science fiction and form become the next battleground. “This Is How You Lose the Time War” by Amal El-Motar and Max Gladstone delivers a romance built from time agents exchanging messages across a conflict between Red (a post-singularity technotopia) and Blue (a single vast consciousness embedded in organic matter). The concept is called “pure genius,” and the world is praised for tactile originality and detail. Yet the reader struggles with mechanics and stakes: why the war requires mutual destruction when timelines can coexist, and how time travel functions. The romance is also seen as slightly over-weighted compared with the world-building.

Other reactions broaden the range. “The Idiot” by Elif Batuman is praised for capturing mid-90s Harvard life as a year of questions rather than conclusions, with small moments feeling meaningful and people feeling hyper-specific. “No One Is Talking About This” by Patricia Lockwood is split: the internet-mirroring first part is brilliant at recreating the absurdity of being online but doesn’t progress emotionally, while the second part hits hard, including a content warning for abortion access-related tragedy.

The episode closes with quieter, character-centered works (“Ghost Forest” by Pik Shweng Fung, “The Most Precious Substance on Earth” by Shashi Bhat) and one disappointment (“Rest and Be Thankful” by Emma Glass), where intense pediatric-hospital labor sometimes feels like intensity without enough emotional payoff. Across the list, the throughline is how form, interiority, and emotional pacing determine whether a book feels alive on the page—regardless of any universal ranking of “best.”

Cornell Notes

This episode treats book ratings as personal—measuring enjoyment and subjective craft impressions rather than declaring universal artistic value. “What Strange Paradise” is praised for lyrical, war-aware prose and characters that feel like real people while reflecting ideas. “She Who Became the Sun” is strongest in You’s interiority, but the war-driven middle is seen as weakening internal character development and romance momentum. “Summer” is airy and philosophically rich yet judged the least experimental and least compelling of the “Seasons Quartet.” Several other novels are evaluated through form and emotional pacing: “This Is How You Lose the Time War” earns high praise for concept and world detail but leaves mechanics/stakes too fuzzy; “The Idiot” succeeds by making small, contemplative moments feel purposeful.

Why does the episode’s rating philosophy matter for interpreting the scores given to each book?

The host explicitly separates personal enjoyment and subjective craft impressions from any claim about a book’s inherent value. A “five out of five” means the reader enjoyed it and found craft elements resonant; a “two out of five” means it didn’t land personally. The ratings are framed as reflections of one reader’s experience—how much it resonated and how well it felt crafted—rather than a universal judgment about literature’s worth.

What makes “What Strange Paradise” stand out stylistically and structurally?

It runs on two timelines and two main characters—Vonna on an island and Ammar, a Syrian refugee boy whose ship survives a storm. The praise focuses on prose that’s evocative and beautiful while still hyper-realistic about war. Characters are described as appearing at a pivotal moment, almost like embodiments of ideas, yet still feeling real. The stylistic blend is compared to “Exit West” by Mohsin Hamid, emphasizing lyrical impressionism paired with war realism.

Where does “She Who Became the Sun” gain and lose momentum, according to the reader?

The book’s strongest element is You’s interiority—her inner conflict and inner strength—especially early on in the monastery. The reader says the novel weakens when it shifts into a war plot line that becomes more external, reducing the depth of internal character development. There’s also a desire for more romance development, given the disguised-identity and gendered tension setup.

How does “This Is How You Lose the Time War” balance romance, world-building, and clarity?

The concept is praised as exceptionally original: time agents Red and Blue exchange messages across a time war that turns into romance. The world is described as tactile and inventive, with world-building delivered through detailed, small elements. But the reader struggles with the mechanics and stakes—why the war requires mutual destruction if timelines can coexist, and how time travel and the war’s origin work. The romance is also seen as slightly taking over from the world-building.

What is the core tension in the reaction to “No One Is Talking About This”?

The first part is called a brilliant recreation of being online—capturing absurdity, constant narrative churn, and the jarring distance from people you don’t truly know. But it’s criticized for not saying much or progressing meaningfully beyond reflecting what’s already felt on social media. The second part is described as emotionally stunning and includes a content warning related to abortion access and a high-risk pregnancy tragedy.

Why does “Ghost Forest” resonate despite its sparse, airy structure?

It’s described as sparse and tender, with short chapters that drift like moments rather than conventional plot. Even with limited snippets, the reader feels a cohesive sense of character and emotion. The book’s use of negative space is likened to poetry and ink painting—where what’s left unsaid carries meaning. Themes of separation from a parent, cultural disconnect, and grief are presented as humane rather than melodramatic.

Review Questions

  1. Which books in the episode are praised primarily for interiority, and which are praised primarily for plot/world mechanics?
  2. How does the reader’s preference for character-driven narratives shape the criticisms of “She Who Became the Sun” and the praise for “The Idiot”?
  3. What kinds of clarity problems (mechanics, stakes, emotional progression) repeatedly affect the reader’s enjoyment across different genres?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Ratings are treated as personal measures of enjoyment and subjective craft, not as judgments of a book’s universal artistic value.

  2. 2

    “What Strange Paradise” is praised for combining lyrical, impressionistic prose with hyper-realistic depictions of war across two timelines.

  3. 3

    “She Who Became the Sun” is strongest when it digs into You’s interiority; the war-focused middle is criticized for reducing inner character development and romance momentum.

  4. 4

    “Summer” is described as airy and philosophically rich but judged the weakest “Seasons Quartet” entry due to less compelling interpersonal stakes and reduced experimental form.

  5. 5

    “This Is How You Lose the Time War” earns major praise for originality and tactile world detail, while losing points for unclear time-war mechanics and stakes.

  6. 6

    “No One Is Talking About This” is split: the online-form first part is brilliant but emotionally non-progressive, while the second part delivers strong impact with a sensitive content warning.

  7. 7

    “Ghost Forest” succeeds through sparse, poem-like negative space that still builds a full emotional picture of characters and grief.

Highlights

The episode’s ratings come with a disclaimer: enjoyment and craft impressions are personal, not a verdict on a book’s inherent worth.
“What Strange Paradise” is credited with a rare balance—lyrical style and impressionistic feel paired with brutally realistic war consequences.
“This Is How You Lose the Time War” is called conceptually “pure genius,” yet the reader wants more concrete answers about how the time war works.
“No One Is Talking About This” is praised for capturing the absurdity of being online, then sharply contrasted by a second half that becomes emotionally devastating.
“Ghost Forest” uses negative space—like ink painting or poetry—to make separation and grief feel humane rather than sensational.

Topics

  • Book Reviews
  • Refugee Fiction
  • Historical Fiction
  • Time Travel Romance
  • Internet Novels
  • Character Interiority
  • Literary Style

Mentioned

  • Amar El Akkad
  • Mohsin Hamid
  • Shelley Parker-Chan
  • Ali Smith
  • Amal El-Motar
  • Max Gladstone
  • Elif Batuman
  • Patricia Lockwood
  • Pik Shweng Fung
  • Emma Glass
  • Shashi Bhat