Recent Reads #39 | A book I love and a book I hate
Based on ShaelinWrites's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.
“Cold Enough for Snow” earns praise for delicate, low-stakes intimacy, but repeated backstory dips are said to weaken present-day relationship development.
Briefing
A quietly devastating mother–daughter travel story and a fiercely polarizing horror classic bookend a reading streak that swings from lyrical wonder to outright disgust. In “Cold Enough for Snow,” Jessica Au’s novel lingers over a few days in Tokyo as a mother and daughter travel together, building its impact through fragility, low stakes, and a narrative that feels almost whispered. The relationship is the emotional core, but frequent backstory dips blunt the present-tense intimacy the premise promises—leaving the bond with less depth than it could have had, even as the prose remains delicate and thought-dense.
The most talked-about “love” lands in “When I’m Gone Look for Me in the East” by Qwan Berry, a Mongolian road narrative driven by reincarnation lore and the bond between twin brothers. Chulan, still a monk, and his brother Mun—once identified as the reincarnation of a significant llama—set out across Mongolia to find another child who might carry the same spiritual return. The plot is simple: meet children, test claims, travel onward. What makes it unforgettable is the voice and the way the story turns that journey into layered reflection—rich, wise, vibrant, and poetic—so that even a straightforward quest feels expansive.
For craft-minded reasons, the reading list also includes “Jane a Murder” by Maggie Nelson, a true-crime memoir built from shifting vignette forms, found footage, and journal fragments arranged into poetry. Nelson’s approach avoids sensationalism, treating the aunt’s death as a wound that must be understood rather than a spectacle to consume. Yet the book’s verse-and-fragment structure starts to feel repetitive as it progresses, with the form sometimes used less as a scene-specific tool and more as a consistent template.
The sharpest backlash targets “Ring” by Koji Suzuki, translated by Robert B. Ramer and Glenn W. Waly. The cursed-tape premise remains gripping and the lore delivers real mystery and some strong early reveals. But the later conclusions feel like unearned leaps, and the characters—especially Ryuji and Asakawa—are described as flat and morally repellent. The critique becomes especially intense around how sexual assault is depicted: scenes are framed from the perpetrator’s perspective, treated with “quirk”-like casualness, and reinforced with misogyny and victim-blaming. Transphobia is also called out. The verdict is blunt: the movie adaptation is praised for removing the worst elements and making Asakawa a woman, while the book is recommended only for die-hard “Ring” franchise fans who want the origin material.
Other titles land in the middle. “Vagabonds” by El Ghosa Sunday offers a fragmented, surreal Lagos portrait that excites at the language-and-form level but struggles with forward momentum, almost like a string of beginnings rather than a sustained narrative. “The Empress of Salt and Fortune” by Nghi Vo earns praise for its short, mythic, lyrical world-building—though the reviewer wants deeper characterization and more event depth. “13 Shells” by Nadia Bozak disappoints for lack of character evolution and weak standalone story impact. Poetry is mixed: “Time Is a Mother” by Ocean Vuong starts underwhelmingly but improves, while “Self-Help” by Laurie Moore is celebrated as a near-masterclass in second-person short fiction. “Portrait of an Unknown Lady” by María Gainza, translated by Thomas Bunsted, is praised for elegant prose and a Buenos Aires art-forgery premise, but the second half is said to lose momentum by shifting focus away from the protagonist’s perspective toward procedural investigation.
Cornell Notes
The reading list pairs delicate, relationship-driven fiction with craft-driven experiments and a highly controversial horror classic. “Cold Enough for Snow” is praised for its gentle, fragile tone but criticized for relying too heavily on backstory dips that weaken the present-day mother–daughter bond. “When I’m Gone Look for Me in the East” is the standout favorite: a simple reincarnation quest across Mongolia becomes expansive through Chulan’s distinctive voice and the brothers’ relationship. “Jane a Murder” earns credit for humanizing a real death through poetic, non-sensational form shifts, though the structure can feel repetitive. “Ring” is described as compulsively readable for its lore and early reveals, but rejected for flat, despicable characters and problematic depictions of sexual violence and other prejudices.
What makes “Cold Enough for Snow” feel distinctive even though it has little plot?
Why does “When I’m Gone Look for Me in the East” land as a favorite despite a simple premise?
How does “Jane a Murder” handle true crime differently from typical true-crime storytelling?
What are the main reasons “Ring” is both compelling and deeply disliked?
Which books are praised for form and language even when momentum or character development falters?
Review Questions
- Which structural choice in “Cold Enough for Snow” most undermines the relationship the reviewer expected to feel central?
- What specific combination of strengths and flaws makes “Ring” a “read it but don’t recommend it” case?
- How do the reviewer’s reactions to “Jane a Murder” and “Vagabonds” differ when form becomes repetitive or when narrative momentum stalls?
Key Points
- 1
“Cold Enough for Snow” earns praise for delicate, low-stakes intimacy, but repeated backstory dips are said to weaken present-day relationship development.
- 2
“When I’m Gone Look for Me in the East” stands out because a simple reincarnation quest becomes emotionally expansive through Chulan’s distinctive voice and the brothers’ bond.
- 3
“Jane a Murder” is credited with humanizing a real death through non-sensational true-crime memoir techniques, including poetry built from journal fragments.
- 4
“Ring” is described as gripping for its lore and early mystery, yet rejected for flat, despicable characters and problematic depictions of sexual assault, misogyny, and transphobia.
- 5
“Vagabonds” is praised for language-and-form experimentation and a surreal Lagos lens, but criticized for fragmented beginnings and weak forward narrative momentum.
- 6
“The Empress of Salt and Fortune” is valued for short, mythic, lyrical world-building, while the reviewer wants deeper characterization and more event depth.
- 7
“Self-Help” by Laurie Moore is highlighted as a standout collection for punchy, clever second-person stories that balance heart, pain, comedy, and playfulness.