Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Recent Reads #60 | experimental fiction, horror, & hidden gems thumbnail

Recent Reads #60 | experimental fiction, horror, & hidden gems

ShaelinWrites·
6 min read

Based on ShaelinWrites's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Penance stands out for using a collage of in-world documents (testimonials and Tumblr excerpts) to create morally layered unreliability where no single truth can be confirmed.

Briefing

A run of experimental and genre-bending fiction left the reader most impressed by books that make form do the emotional work—especially works that mimic how trauma, memory, and online life actually feel. The strongest standout was Eliza Clark’s Penance, a “fictional true crime” built from testimonials, Tumblr excerpts, and found-footage-style fragments about a seaside murder involving three teenage girls. The result lands as gripping and morally layered: the non-fiction packaging creates a new kind of unreliable narration where no single version of events can be trusted, and the mid-2010s online culture details feel uncomfortably accurate.

Several other titles also earned praise for immersive craft, even when they didn’t fully land. Brandy George’s Fawn blends play, verse, myth, and fiction into a woodsy Greek-tragedy atmosphere after a woman experiences sexual assault and encounters mythic forest figures. The prose is described as visceral and electric—so immersive it feels like a fairy tale that turns insidious—though a 40-page alphabetical “poem” is criticized for pulling the reader out of the story’s momentum. Rebecca Watson’s Little Scratch goes even further into experimental form: a one-day stream of consciousness rendered through overlapping, shifting columns, designed to feel simultaneous rather than sequential. It’s described as claustrophobic, loud, and maddening in a productive way, especially because the chaotic layout is treated as a closer match to how internal experience works.

Not every experiment succeeded. Lear Hunt’s In the House in the dark of the woods is called confusing without the “intentional” kind of confusion that would make it feel purposeful; the reader never feels grounded in place, character, or plot cohesion. Sabrina Ora’s Wild Milk is praised as clever and playful in individual pieces, but the consistent tonal stasis and brevity make the collection blur when read back-to-back. Lucy Rose’s The Lamb delivers the feral literary folk horror vibes the reader wanted, with a tender, complex protagonist and impeccable atmosphere, but the themes are judged too on-the-nose and the middle drags through repeated plot points.

Other books land as strong executions of familiar blends rather than breakthroughs. Gil Vanderbuden’s The Safekeep is praised for sleek, punchy, fragment-heavy prose and a tense Dutch-countryside setup that cracks into unexpected territory; the ending is criticized for tipping into melodrama too quickly. Cayman Cheng’s Cecilia is celebrated as perverse, tender, and visceral, with maximalist style that works in novella form—though timeline collisions can disorient beyond the intended effect. Alyssa Alluring’s Southern Moss is richest in the sister relationship and queer identity undercurrents, while the murder mystery engine sputters later.

Two works are singled out for different kinds of dissatisfaction. Meline Doctrree’s Gender Theory uses second person across a long life arc but becomes monotonous and emotionally underdeveloped, with endometriosis depiction standing out as the most impactful element. New Abby Nool’s Supplication offers stunning, jarring sentences yet remains so disorienting that even close reading can’t restore clarity, leading to an unrated verdict. Annette Sanuk Clap Saddle’s Even as We Breathe starts with a promising World War II resort/P-camp premise and a compelling voice, but the story drifts into new directions without committing, leaving the ending half-cohesive.

Across the slate, the through-line is clear: the reader rewards writing that uses structure—whether mythic verse, overlapping columns, or true-crime collage—to make lived experience feel immediate. When that craft fractures into confusion, monotony, or melodrama, the spell breaks quickly, even if the prose remains impressive.

Cornell Notes

The strongest reactions cluster around experimental forms that simulate real experience—especially trauma and uncertainty. Eliza Clark’s Penance uses a fictional true-crime structure (testimonials, Tumblr excerpts, found-footage-like fragments) to create a layered, morally tense unreliability where no one “truth” can be known. Rebecca Watson’s Little Scratch similarly turns form into meaning through overlapping, shifting columns that make thought feel simultaneous rather than sequential. Several other books impress on atmosphere and language (Fawn, The Safekeep, Cecilia, Southern Moss), but many lose momentum through disorientation, tonal repetition, or endings that tip into melodrama. Overall, the reader values execution that matches subject matter—while rejecting experiments that confuse without purpose or characters that stay too thin to sustain the plot.

What makes Penance’s “fictional true crime” approach feel uniquely gripping rather than just stylized?

Penance is structured like an in-world non-fiction account of a real-feeling crime: three teenage girls set a classmate on fire in a small English seaside town. The book unfolds through sections for the victim (Joan), each perpetrator, and a girl who was arrested but later proven innocent. Instead of a single narrative voice, it uses testimonials and Tumblr/blog excerpts, creating gritty realism and a found-footage effect. That presentation also changes unreliability: because the events are packaged as multiple in-world texts, trust can’t settle on one storyteller—everyone has a version, and the reader can’t reliably determine what happened.

Why does Little Scratch’s layout matter as much as its subject matter?

Little Scratch follows one day as a woman tries to go to work while processing sexual assault, but the form is the point. It’s described as stream of consciousness that isn’t linear; overlapping columns shift constantly, so multiple internal processes appear at once. The reader connects this to a medium mismatch: writing is sequential, but life is simultaneous. The shifting columns are treated as a way to “download” internal narrative so the reading experience becomes claustrophobic, loud, and chaotic—mirroring the mental state tied to trauma. It’s maddening to read, but the difficulty is framed as necessary for realism.

Where does Fawn succeed, and what specifically breaks immersion?

Fawn combines play, verse, myth, and fiction: after a sexual assault, a woman enters the woods and encounters mythic forest characters in a woodsy Greek-tragedy mode. The reader praises the visceral sounds and images and the way the book feels like a fairy tale that turns insidious. The main disruption is a 40-page poem consisting of an alphabetical list of words. Since the whole book is only about 160 pages, that section is criticized as too long for its purpose, pulling the reader out of the story’s brisk momentum.

Which books are criticized for confusion, and how is that confusion characterized?

Two different “confusion” failures are highlighted. In In the House in the dark of the woods, confusion is described as ungrounding: the reader can’t track where they are, and characters feel thin, so the confusion isn’t “cool” or intentionally crafted. In Supplication, the confusion is more structural and persistent: even with close reading, people and situations pop up without stable orientation. The reader notes that the disorientation creates terror and pressure, but the lack of clarity prevents the story from landing, leading to an unrated outcome.

What pattern emerges in the critiques of character development across multiple titles?

Several critiques point to characters staying too thin or emotionally under-specified to sustain the premise. In In the House in the dark of the woods, characters are “thin” and the plot doesn’t grab. In Gender Theory, the reader wants more development, complexity, and “heat,” arguing that the main character and relationships don’t deepen enough and the book skims time without meaningful exploration. Even when the prose is praised (as in Cecilia’s distinct maximalist style), timeline collisions can disorient; and in Even as We Breathe, the Essie relationship promise fades and returns only for a quick resolution.

How do the reader’s preferences shape what counts as a “successful” folk horror or gothic blend?

The reader likes genre blends when execution sharpens the mood without over-explaining. The Lamb is praised for unhinged, feral literary folk horror vibes, strong girlhood-and-fairy-tale atmosphere, and a complex protagonist, but criticized for themes that feel too on-the-nose and a middle that circles the same plot points. Southern Moss is valued more for the sister relationship and queer identity undercurrents than for the murder mystery, which loses fuel later. The Safekeep is praised for looming tension and polished prose, but the ending’s melodrama is seen as breaking the delicacy built earlier.

Review Questions

  1. Which experimental techniques in Little Scratch and Penance are described as making the reading experience feel more realistic, and what realism are they trying to capture?
  2. Pick one book praised for atmosphere (Fawn, The Lamb, The Safekeep, Cecilia, or Southern Moss). What specific element is credited with immersion, and what element is blamed for breaking momentum?
  3. Compare the critiques of confusion in In the House in the dark of the woods versus Supplication. How does each book’s confusion differ in purpose and effect?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Penance stands out for using a collage of in-world documents (testimonials and Tumblr excerpts) to create morally layered unreliability where no single truth can be confirmed.

  2. 2

    Little Scratch’s overlapping, shifting-column format is treated as a formal solution to the mismatch between sequential writing and simultaneous lived experience.

  3. 3

    Fawn’s mythic, verse-driven immersion is praised, but a 40-page alphabetical poem is criticized for being too long relative to the book’s 160-page length and for interrupting momentum.

  4. 4

    Several titles are faulted for confusion that doesn’t feel purposeful—either by failing to ground readers in place/character (In the House in the dark of the woods) or by preventing clarity even under close reading (Supplication).

  5. 5

    The Lamb delivers strong literary folk horror atmosphere and a complex protagonist, but it’s criticized for over-explicit themes and a middle that repeats plot points.

  6. 6

    Gender Theory is judged emotionally underdeveloped and stylistically monotonous after the novelty of second person fades, with endometriosis depiction singled out as the most impactful part.

  7. 7

    Even as We Breathe starts with a compelling World War II resort/P-camp premise and voice, but the story drifts and the Essie relationship promise doesn’t sustain through the ending.

Highlights

Penance turns a fictional true-crime premise into a new kind of unreliable narration by forcing the reader to live with competing “versions” of events across documents.
Little Scratch makes trauma feel simultaneous by abandoning linear stream-of-consciousness in favor of overlapping, shifting columns—claustrophobic and chaotic by design.
Fawn’s forest-myth immersion is electrifying, but a 40-page alphabetical poem is singled out as an immersion-killer in a short 160-page book.
The Lamb is praised as feral and unhinged literary folk horror with impeccable vibes, yet criticized for themes that feel too on-the-nose and a middle that drags.

Topics

  • Experimental Fiction
  • Fictional True Crime
  • Literary Folk Horror
  • Stream of Consciousness
  • Queer Girlhood
  • Unreliable Narration