Get AI summaries of any video or article — Sign up free
Self-Editing School: How to Self-Edit Your Novel to Improve Readability with JoEllen Nordstrom thumbnail

Self-Editing School: How to Self-Edit Your Novel to Improve Readability with JoEllen Nordstrom

ProWritingAid·
5 min read

Based on ProWritingAid's video on YouTube. If you like this content, support the original creators by watching, liking and subscribing to their content.

TL;DR

Start self-editing fiction by evaluating plot, characters, and settings using a defined story-structure framework before focusing on grammar or punctuation.

Briefing

Self-editing for fiction gets a practical makeover: writers are urged to evaluate their manuscripts at the story-structure level first—plot, characters, and settings—using a defined checklist of 38 story elements, then move on to line and copy editing. The payoff is readability that feels effortless to readers, because the work focuses on whether scenes deliver clear purpose, consistent point of view, and satisfying tension-and-resolution rather than on grammar fixes too early.

The session frames self-editing as a process of tightening the “story arc” before polishing sentences. Writers are told to start by naming every scene (often chapter-sized units) whenever the situation changes, because scene names make it easier to cross-reference later and to detect when a scene doesn’t support the overall plot. Once scenes are laid out, the manuscript is assessed for connectivity: do the events drive the story forward, or do “favorite” scenes weaken momentum? This is paired with a method for checking scene openings and closings—whether they begin with dialogue, thought, description, or action—and whether the pattern becomes repetitive enough to make the reading experience dull or exhausting.

Readability also hinges on “anchoring” the reader quickly. Each scene should establish point of view, setting, time, and location within the first page (ideally the first sentence), so readers don’t have to flip back to figure out who is speaking or where the action is happening. The same attention is applied to entry and exit hooks: openings should grab attention immediately, and endings should create desire to continue—using cliffhangers or other forms of forward pull—so readers feel guided rather than confused.

Characters are treated as structural components, not just personalities. Writers are encouraged to review who appears in each scene, why they’re there, and whether their screen time (including dialogue, action, and interactions) matches their value to the plot. The protagonist should occupy the most space and drive the most interactions, while minor characters may need to be reduced, moved, or reassigned if their contribution doesn’t justify their presence. Point of view must also stay consistent and effective, with each character’s goals, fears, and desires clearly shaping what happens next.

Settings are evaluated for more than atmosphere: location and time should matter to the scene’s meaning, objects should be used with purpose (including foreshadowing), and all five senses—sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch—should be deployed to deepen immersion and tension. Weather and emotional impact are highlighted as levers that can intensify conflict and help readers empathize with characters’ anxieties and expectations.

Finally, the session draws a sharp line between editing levels. Story/developmental editing comes first, focusing on whether the structure makes sense and whether ideas and propositions hold together. Line editing follows, targeting flow, transitions, voice, and sentence-level readability. Copy editing is the rigid grammar, spelling, and punctuation pass, and proofreading happens after formatting. Professional editors are recommended as the “fresh, neutral feedback” step, but the central message is that self-editing improves the quality of that collaboration—especially when writers can point to specific story-structure problems using the same shared framework.

Cornell Notes

The core method for improving fiction readability starts with story-level self-editing, not sentence polishing. Writers should evaluate plot, characters, and settings using a structured checklist of 38 story elements, then check how scenes connect to a strong story arc. Scene naming, varied scene openings/closings, and early anchoring of point of view and setting are presented as key tactics for reducing reader confusion and fatigue. Characters are assessed for proportional presence and consistent point of view, while settings are judged for purposeful sensory detail and emotional impact. The process then moves to line editing and copy editing, with proofreading saved for after formatting.

Why does scene naming matter for self-editing, and what does it help a writer detect?

Scene naming (often chapter-sized units) is recommended whenever the situation changes, because it clarifies each scene’s purpose and makes cross-referencing easier later. With scenes laid out, writers can check whether they’re connected and driving the plot forward. It also helps identify “great” scenes that may not support the overall story arc, making it easier to revise or remove material that weakens momentum.

What does “anchoring the scene” mean in practice, and where should it happen?

Anchoring means establishing point of view and the setting—time and location—very early so readers don’t have to hunt for context. The guidance is to deliver this within the first sentence ideally, and definitely within the first paragraph (and certainly within the first page) to prevent confusion about who is speaking and where events occur.

How should writers vary scene openings and closings to avoid boredom or exhaustion?

Writers are encouraged to tag each scene opening by type—dialogue, thought, description, or action—and then check whether the same pattern repeats too often. If every scene begins and ends with the same kind of high-impact action, the reading experience can become exhausting. Variety helps keep engagement steady and prevents the structure from feeling mechanical.

How are characters evaluated during story-level editing?

Character evaluation focuses on who appears in each scene and why they’re there, plus whether their time and contribution are proportional to their role in the plot. Writers should examine dialogue, action, and interactions per scene, ensuring the protagonist shows up most and drives the most interactions. If a character’s presence doesn’t justify their contribution, the guidance is to revise, reduce, or redistribute importance to better serve the story.

What setting details are most useful for readability and tension?

Settings should be assessed for location/time significance, purposeful objects, and sensory immersion using sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch. Weather is highlighted as a tension amplifier (for example, storms increasing fear or stakes). Emotional impact is also treated as a setting-adjacent tool: writers should show how characters experience fear, anxiety, desire, and anticipation rather than merely describing it.

How do the editing levels differ, and why does the order matter?

The recommended sequence is story/developmental editing first (structure, logic, story arc, and whether ideas hold together), then line editing (flow, transitions, voice, and sentence-level readability), then copy editing (grammar, spelling, punctuation), and finally proofreading after formatting. The order matters because sentence-level fixes can distract from deeper structural problems that require major revision.

Review Questions

  1. When you list your scenes, what specific checks would you run to determine whether a scene supports the story arc?
  2. How would you diagnose whether your openings and closings are becoming repetitive, and what changes would you test first?
  3. Which editing level would you use to address a confusing point of view or unclear setting—and what would you do differently at that stage?

Key Points

  1. 1

    Start self-editing fiction by evaluating plot, characters, and settings using a defined story-structure framework before focusing on grammar or punctuation.

  2. 2

    Name every scene (whenever the situation changes) to make purpose, connectivity, and later cross-referencing easier.

  3. 3

    Check scene openings and closings for variety (dialogue, thought, description, action) to prevent repetitive pacing that can bore or exhaust readers.

  4. 4

    Anchor each scene early with clear point of view plus time and location so readers don’t have to backtrack to understand who/where/when.

  5. 5

    Assess character presence proportionally by scene: dialogue, action, interactions, and whether each character’s goals and fears drive events.

  6. 6

    Use settings actively—objects, sensory detail, and weather—to increase immersion, tension, and emotional resonance.

  7. 7

    Follow the editing ladder in order: story/developmental first, then line editing, then copy editing, and save proofreading for after formatting.

Highlights

Readability improves most when writers fix story structure first—plot, characters, and settings—rather than jumping straight to sentence-level corrections.
Scene naming turns self-editing into a methodical audit: it reveals disconnected scenes and helps writers revise or remove material that doesn’t support the story arc.
Early anchoring (point of view, time, location) prevents reader confusion and reduces the need to flip back through pages.
Characters should be evaluated for proportional presence and consistent point of view, not just for personality traits.
Editing levels are distinct: story/developmental editing comes before line and copy editing, and proofreading happens only after formatting.

Topics